[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 2026-03-03 12.21.54.jpg (60 KB, 1400x700)
60 KB
60 KB JPG
In gen V Game Freak were as lazy as always and bad pixel art using the cut out technique to animate the monsters was awful. Mew tail was almost not seen because of how pixels were a mess because of that lazy technique. Anyone has more examples?
>>
>>59003934
These games are more than 15 years old, at some point you need to get over stupid shit like this
>>
File: IMG_6311.jpg (10 KB, 305x221)
10 KB
10 KB JPG
>>59003934
Mew's tail looking like shit was always a thing. But there are tons of glitchy bad pixelated effects generated because of what you mentioned...
>>
>>59003959
Just asking for examples.
>>
>>59003934
It's using rot-sprite without correcting to simulate animations using sprite rotation of course it looks bad. Game freak was never good at pixel art.
>>
>>59003959
do you say the same about gen 4, you disingenuous unovabortion?
>>
>>59004194
Say the same about what? The sprites don't do this in gen 4. But yeah, those games are even older and it's for the best of we get over petty shit like this
>>
>>59004319
Older games are lazy too. This is a huge prove of that.
>>
File: kojo10.png (58 KB, 580x526)
58 KB
58 KB PNG
>>59003934
>>59003992
Hey Kojo. Next time don't use the same bait you use on /vp/ on Twitter. Maybe then I wouldn't've found you by complete circumstance.
>>
>>59004574
yeah that could've been me
>>
File: aerodactyl (1).gif (44 KB, 178x184)
44 KB
44 KB GIF
This is one of the most egregious examples. They didn't animate Aerodactyl's tail moving back correctly and it just snaps back into place.
>>
File: mew.gif (4 KB, 56x56)
4 KB
4 KB GIF
>>59003992
Sprites peaked in Crystal, both the actual sprites and the animations. The lazy warps and movements they do for animations in the later games don't compare.
>>
>>59004946
Wait, Aerodactyl's tail doesn't snap back to attack like a scorpion?
>>
File: file.png (56 KB, 1235x246)
56 KB
56 KB PNG
>>59004986
It only looks like a scorpion because they just copied the static gen 4 sprite that's doing a dynamic pose and then lazily slapped rotation movements onto it
>>
>the uncs itt can't comprehend moving sprites made for screens bigger than a gameboy
>>
>>59005006
Shadow is different, it reminds me of Ridley attacking so I'm ok with it.
>>
>>59005033
The Gen V games are the ugliest games Game Freak has ever made.
>>
>>59003934
>Mew tail was almost not seen
First off, learn English.
Secondly, what about this >>59003992 is hard to see?
>>
>>59006241
Oui
>>
>>59006241
>what about this >>59003992 is hard to see?
the entire tail because it's animated like shit
>>
Pokemon pixel art, regardless of generation, was ALWAYS worse than what companies like Capcom and Square were doing.
>>
I'm playing Gen 5 for the first time now, and I gotta admit I like the animated sprites even if they look awful at times. I don't hate 3D Pokémon or anything, but if they ever went back to 2D I wouldn't mind if they attempted something similar to Gen V but good.
>>
>>59005033
the DS' screens were hardly higher resolution than Game Boy Advance screens, this issue wasn't noticeable to the target audience of them
just play the fucking game
PTOOEY
>>
>>59004959
i like gen 5's animated sprites but i gotta agree. crystal's sprites are in a tier of their own.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.