Are we ready to admit that the 3d models are better than sprites?
>>59094715Why would I "admit" to something that is false?
>>59094715No, because these look good and actually give the Pokemon personality.The 3D models look sterile and might as well reduce the Pokemon to sterile blobs and puppets on strings.
They should do what Digimon is doinghttps://youtu.be/ldKGPj5hgKc?si=y-IfXkIN9f_InbHw
>>59094715I will say the 3D models make some Pokemon designs a lot cooler, just because you have to see them in motion to understand them. But aesthetically you can't beat the sprites. I actually think they went the wrong way after XY, I think them trying to make the 3D models look "sprite-like" was the right idea and they should have leaned harder into it. If GameFreak had gone the route of Arc System Works we could have had some really nice fauxsprite art in the games.
spritecucks are just contrarian "old good new bad" millenials blinded by nostalgia.fully animated 3d models you can view from every angle are objectively better with no room for debate.
>>59094715No. There are so many designs that look better in sprite form, even ones that came out during Gens 6-9.
>>59094715Nah, sprites are aesthetically appealing-enough to make even the most controversial new designs more tolerable.
>>59096030>3D: toilet>2D: actually a cute redesign3D shills lost.
>>59094715The issue was never 3D, the issue was alway game freak
Always was since stadium 1.
>>59096030nvm, there's just some things sprites just can't fix
>>59094715>are we ready to admit tbat models are better than sprites>posts image of sprites that look better than models
