How we feeling /vp/?>”Our plan right now is to have that kind of change over time, so the meta game or the Pokémon that are available at any given time to be used may be different as time goes on," producer Masaaki Hoshino said in a group interview>"We're planning to keep Pokémon Champions going far into the future – basically forever, as long as the Pokémon series is continuing.”>"And who knows? Far in the future, we'll have 2,000, 3,000, maybe 10,000 Pokémon," Hoshino continued. "If we had all of those available to be played, I think it would just become such a complicated situation. So I think the idea that we have right now is only a limited selection available, but shifting over time."https://web.archive.org/web/20260327050903/https://www.ign.com/articles/the-pokemon-company-is-already-considering-a-future-where-the-total-number-of-pocket-monsters-available-hits-maybe-10000
>>59102370There are currently only 150 Pokémon, and thats how many there will ever be.
>>59102370how cares the Kanto, shillmons, and mega saiyans matter in anything. Everything is is fodder that will be dexited.
>We're making sure this software can be future proofedClickbait sites:>OMG 10000 Pokemon confirmed!?/thread
Will pokemon still be getting new games 270 years from now?
>>59102522Hopefully by that time society has gone off the deep end and nintendo/tpc executives have been publicly executed for being capitalist scum
>>59102526kys you communist piece of shit
>>59102529you first slave
>>59102370Not allowing all Pokémon in ranked matches is fine by me.However, it would be great to have a mode where anyone could play, even if it means some games will never be ranked.Because if we have to wait even on this application for Game Freak to authorize a Pokemon to be able to have some fun with it, it does not solve the problem of the horrible Dexcut.
>>59102370>over 10,000 pokemon>but only 0.001% of them will ever be beloved and evergreen at any given timeThat's a kekworthy thought.
>>59102522At this point you're asking if the concept of money to be made will exist.
>>59102370>The number of pokemon could one day be as many as 10,000>Home can only hold 6000wonder how theyll deal with thatthen again ill probably be dead by then
>>59102867I mean yeah it took 30 years for there to be 1k, at 10k it would be 10x that amount of time, roughly...
>>59102522Who knows how it would look by then (if it's still around). If full-dive becomes a thing it would probably be one of the first IPs to capitalize on it, so it could easily become a everlasting franchise.If such a route is taken, I could see thousands of new Pokémon getting procedually generated whether they'd be quality designs would be another matter
Gotta catch 'em all
>>59102522It'll be amazing if society is even still running in 270 years and we haven't gone full Mad Max/Horizon Zero Dawn
