/vp/ - FORBES IS REPORTING ON THE TYPHLOSION LEAKS - Pokémon

Anonymous

FORBES IS REPORTING ON THE TYP(...) 03/29/26(Sun)14:50:54 No.59111316

File: forbes.png (420 KB, 989x806)

FORBES IS REPORTING ON THE TYPHLOSION LEAKS Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)14:50:54 No.59111316 Archived

This is the first time Pokémon is ever mentioned by FORBES, and it is because Typhlosion drugged and raped a little girl.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/paultassi/2024/10/17/more-details-emerge-regarding-the-great-creepy-typhlosion-debacle/

Typhlosion bros, this is not fair.

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)14:53:22 No.59111328

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)14:53:22 No.59111328

>>59111316
>2024

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)14:53:40 No.59111330

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)14:53:40 No.59111330

>>59111316
>the tale is about a Mujina, not necessarily the literal Pokémon Typhlosion
>not typhlosion

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)15:14:39 No.59111392

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)15:14:39 No.59111392

>"Senior Contributor"
That's not actually Forbes, that's a random schmuck who paid to get his article on the Forbes website.

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)15:22:57 No.59111412

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)15:22:57 No.59111412

>>59111316
>Teraleak was one and a half years ago
Damn...

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)17:22:11 No.59111661

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)17:22:11 No.59111661

File: Typhlosion Lore Leak (1).png (436 KB, 2352x3082)

436 KB PNG

>>59111316

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)17:50:24 No.59111714

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)17:50:24 No.59111714

>>59111392
Why did he pay thousands of dollars to get a diss article on Typhlosion published

Shillmon panders will then say there is no smear campaign on Typhlosion

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)18:21:54 No.59111786

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)18:21:54 No.59111786

>>59111661
i like how game freak has time to write what can only be describd as the pokemon equivalant of blood libel against Typhlosion, but a mega is too much, what worthless pedos.
>>59111714
he/she/it is just a pedophile wanting to deflect from the real Epstein list, and pokemon fans are the one fandom retarded/ cannibalistic enough too fall for it

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)18:23:04 No.59111787

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)18:23:04 No.59111787

>>59111316
No I will not go to your site where I have to scroll past an ad every paragraph in a 20 paragraph article where it easily could've been reduced to half of a paragraph. Give me a summary

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)18:53:09 No.59111847

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)18:53:09 No.59111847

>>59111316
Why are you digging up an article from 2024? When are people going to shut up about this dumb shit?

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)19:23:01 No.59111951

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)19:23:01 No.59111951

>>59111847
when you stop being really really mad about it lol

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)19:24:16 No.59111955

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)19:24:16 No.59111955

>>59111847
Meganiumfag saw he had gone 12 hours without a new thread so he needed to make one

Anonymous
03/29/26(Sun)19:25:35 No.59111960

Anonymous 03/29/26(Sun)19:25:35 No.59111960

>>59111316
>is reporting
>2024
>is
>currently 2026