[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


you know what really anoys me about these games?
Its how little information they give the player about basic functions and stats?
Im just getting into the series again and replaying Firered for a long time and one think that really anoys me is how the game rarley gives out baic information
Pokemons stats for example are neddlesly obtuse
I want to know if its worth leveling up a low level pokemon because some of the pokemon you can get early on like Nidoking or Clefable have a really good stat spread but because there so low level its hard to compare their stats to the pokemon you already have since they are at much higher level so they look weak by comparsion because theres no way to figure out there base statline
What i mean is Cleafable has a decent 90/95 spc atk and def but because i evolved him super early on his stats look like shit he only has 33 spc atk and i cant figure out how much stronger that stat is gonna be once he levels up and is on the same level as all my other pokemon
It makes evaluating them really hard and forces me to go to the wiki all the time to see which one is actually good or not
That and a bunch of other shit like IVs and EVs which arent that important in a single player run but still would be nice to know about



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.