3D was a mistake
The ultimate/dream Pokémon game for many can only be realized in a fully 3D space. Too bad GameFreak is a subpar developer.
>>59125348agreed, pokemon should have stayed 2d
>>59125348
>>59125788Thinking that GF were good devs in Gen 5... hah.
>>59125788hi yawnfag
>>59125348The game doesn't look like that
>>59125348Where is this from?
>>59125788shitty 2d spammer btfo'ed yet again
>>59126267Nowhere.
Then why aren't any of the sixty-seven thousand, one hundred and ninety eight pixel monster tamer games worth talking about?
>>59125348Your supposed to make a thread that talks about a bold fringe take, not the objective truth.
>>59125348If 2D is so good, why do you have to keep using pixel fanart that is nonindicative of what the 2D era actually looked like?Afraid people might correctly recognize Pokemon has ALWAYS been dogshit visually and there's no reason to have tribal warfare over which turd has the least terrible smell?
>>59125788it doesn't, that's the problem. gen 5 is shit
>>59125788And yet it still looks better than any of the 3D games.If anything, that just proves that 2D is better. Because you can have different artstyles to fit the different regions.>>59126341>2d is bad because the gbc is shit compared to modern hardwareFor a Game Boy Color game, I think it looks really nice.
>>59126341because when they had more memory, they could have drawn more tiles and sprites. you know, what they WERE doing.pixel artists can and do stick to palettes, a grid system, etc. it's games like Shovel Knight and Stardew Valley that cheat. i'm not going to be anal about sprite limits or anything like that, but graphics drawn/moving 'between' pixels, or some vector TrueType font that doesn't fit, it actually ruins the look.it's a reasonable criticism that the official games gave up trying. Final Fantasy did it, Pokémon couldn't...?
>>59125357>>59125788Meanwhile the best looking 3D Pokémon game looks like this:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7g8zcBUG-sMore like a nightmare than a dream.