should they bring back pseudo-starters for future games?
>>59158211We should have Starters that are Pseudos.
>>59158211They should just give you a free KANTOOOOOOOO starter like in X and Y
You only need one pseudo-starter.
>>59158231Pokémon Unbound
>>59158245This but unitobically (sorry but autocorrect didn't catch that and I can't be assed)Getting a second set of starters was fun and it would be a great way to give starters who fell to the wayside like Gen 4 a turn in the spotlight
>>59158211No because the games already give you too many event pokemon. I will only agree to it if they get rid of the mandatory kanto starter and gimmick pokemon.
>>59158211they should make the monkies the starters of a future game
>>59158336holy shit you fucking keep autocorrect on? How fucking insane are you? That shit is mind-numbing
>>59158211Eeveelutions kind of fill that gap. We don't need any more dex filler.
>>59159634>noooo stop making more pokemonfuck you and anyone who says shit like this
>>59159634I'm tired of eeveeslop.
>>59158211They should give these guys a third evo
>>59159658Design quality goes down when you're adding too many new Pokémon in a short amount of time. Slow the roll.>>59159663You don't have to use them.
>>59158336>starters who fell to the wayside like Gen 4 a turn in the spotlightthe best designed starters gameplay-wise that everybody still adores?
>>59158211I liked the idea behind Elemental monkeys. They were just a simple tool teaching new players about importance of type matchups. They were also kinda sorta useable in-game, especially Simisage has advantage because it's main STAB move runs from ATK just as all the more interesting coverage moves shared by all monkeys.Some people hate them because some how they believe that they lol "clog the Pokedex", but desu would it make any practical difference if they would count as different forms of the same Pokemon? Still they would be three separately designed creatures and only numbers in Pokedex would change.
