[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Umeko and Takeru.png (647 KB, 1489x1371)
647 KB PNG
Hey, I'm back! Last thread had me deciding on what to base the regional bird on. I've settled on a nightjar and now I got the regional mammal/bird/bug archetypes done. Here are other archetypes that I got done.

3-stage Rock line: Rock/Poison sulphur kaiju
Pikaclone: Electric/Fire Kodama-nezumi
Fossil duo: Rock/Fighting Naumann's elephant and Rock/Psychic Sinomegaceros
Pseudo-legendary: Dragon-type Toyotamaphimeia

More to follow...
>>
File: IMG_4584.jpg (62 KB, 1279x416)
62 KB JPG
>>59199321
>Toyotamaphimeia
You mean this by any chance?
>>
>>59199321
These trainers still have that "austistic deviantart" look to them. I'd suggest tightening up your linework and flip your work to check it (the female trainer is looking like Wigglytuff's RG sprite).
>>
>>59199581
I didn’t do the artwork. Someone else did.
>>59199578
Yes!
>>
a3lzIGRhdmlk
>>
>>59199612
ditch them and find a new artist
>>
File: Umeko and Takeru.png (564 KB, 870x978)
564 KB PNG
>>59199679
Better?
>>
File: image.png (49 KB, 587x193)
49 KB PNG
>>59199810
Worse, honestly.
>>
>>59199810
holy shit, what the fuck is that anatomy? i'm with >>59200632, this one is worse
>>
>>59200636
>>59200632
Tbh, that’s what I thought as well.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.