[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: newdesignpokemon.jpg (289 KB, 2304x1296)
289 KB JPG
i have this theory that pokemon are getting uglier and look less pokemon-ish, they look like they're from a different series because of fan concept art.
basically whenever fan concept art nails the pokemon look and fans create pokemon that look like they belong in the franchise, the pokemon company has to slightly alter the style of what pokemon look like and it's gotten to a point where some pokemon don't look like pokemon anymore.
nintendo knows, since they love to sue people, that if they make pokemon that look too close to fan concepts they'll get sued, so they developed a strategy where they alter slightly what pokemon look like stylistically so by the time fans nail the look, it's already outdated.
It's why eveelutions that people want can't be made too, because people love evee so much they've made too many cool concepts that if pokemon makes a cool eevelution it'll look too much like something that's already been made by fans and they'll get sued.

just look at these things, they don't look like they belong in pokemon, but that's because nintendo was forced to alter what a pokemon looks like stylistically just to stay ahead of the race.

i'm not saying they're bad designs, i'm saying they don't look like pokemon, they look bootleg or like digimon and guzzlord looks like he's a billy and mandy monster, like he belongs in a kids halloween cartoon movie.
>>
>>59238152
>if they make pokemon that look too close to fan concepts they'll get sued,
same realm of delulu as "people will steal my video game idea!"
>>
>>59238152
I don't think fans and fakemon artists can sue Nintendo for "stealing their designs".
But I also think that each generation has its distinct artstyle and themes. I don't know if this is done intentionally or just a byproduct of the passing of time and development of new technologies.
As for Paradox mons and especially Ultra Beasts, they are intentionally weird and alien because they are not native to the world. They are not meant to look like real Pokémon.
>>
>>59238152
>nintendo knows, since they love to sue people, that if they make pokemon that look too close to fan concepts they'll get sued
Why do people think this?
>>
>>59238152
GF have no excuse, I've AI generated better stuff than what they're putting out these days.
>>
But Gholdengo is fugly and I wanna fucking tear it into pieces so I will give you that point. Such an unworthy mon of the spot 1000.
>>
>designs that don't look like pokemon
>it's designs that look like pokemon or are intentionally made to break the rules of normal pokemon
like the only good example you got here is zeraora because it's just a generic furry you could see anywhere or in a random gacha game
>>
>>59238194
>esl thinks his aislop is worth anything
>>
>>59238198
i think it's the perfect mon, they chose it purposely to depict what is truly important to them and that is the money from the fans that will buy their products not matter how shitty they make them. goldeno is the personification or the mascot of nintendos greed.
>>
>>59238192
it has happened a few times in the past with different franchises... granted these all involved dubious circumstances involving "submit a design" contests back before the language/understanding that submitting a piece of art to a corporate campaign means it becomes theirs to use became normalized, but still notable...
... for franchises that do "submit a design" contests.
>>
>>59238213
>i think it's the perfect mon, they chose it purposely to depict what is truly important to them and that is the money from the fans that will buy their products not matter how shitty they make them. goldeno is the personification or the mascot of nintendos greed.
I don't care. It's ugly!
Get the flamer!
>>
>>59238198
>>59238213
i see it as the same thing but not as negative. a "thank you" that this franchise has been made so successful by the efforts of the fans.
granted i like his design. kokopeli string cheese surfer mascot made of coins goes hard imo.
>>
>>59238229
Imagine if TPC ever hosted a contest like that for a new evolution line. It would fuel the shitposting engine for a million years, like the starter wars but a thousand times worse.
>>
>>59238152
The ultra beast were deliberately designed to not look like pokemon.
>>
>>59238152
>>59238188
It's bound to happen when different thematic elements came into play in designing a new Pokemon.

For example, PLA introduced Enamorus who is supposed to be a member of the genies. They decided to incoporate the mouth tattoos of Ainu women into her design (which reflected the native Hokkaido culture), and in turn caused disharmony among the group.
>>
I just don't feel attached to the nu mons because teh Switch titles were so bad that I didn't even play them so I have made no memories or experiences with the nu mons whatsoever besides looking at art of them on 4chan. Meanwhile, I spent a good chunk of my childhood with the gen 1-3 mons and have had so many hours of fun and adventures with the gen 4-6 mons.
But I still like some of them. There are some really good designs, there are some absolute shit designs and there are a whole bunch of just meh whatever designs.
>>
>>59238152
Munkidori was hard to swallow. The lines on the eyes... Fuck that
>>
Animalfaggot seethe thread btw
>>
>>59238317
i like mukidori, but he looks more like a graffiti than a pokemon.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.