I hope Pokemon would crash and burn as a franchise
>>59240470don't we all
>>59240470Based
>>59240470We all do mate.
>>59240470>>59240470>Games are mediocre and are now taking longer without the effort to match its duration>People will defend it because don't you dare criticize poor decision making, keep buying it so you can continue to support bad decision making and bad labor. If something goes wrong, we will only spread a hashtag to support the devs in spirit.>Manchildren are now literally killing each other over cards and scalping>People will forget about it not even two weeks later to continue with the same cycle of shilling and whining>Publicly mock every single thing that was dubbed the "Pokemon killer">But whine when one game survived the label to the point of begging Nintendo to fucking sue a game, effectively giving them the greenlight to start a crusade to get an monopoly on gameplay mechanics.>Die-hard refusal to acknowledge the issues that will 100% snowball if Nintendo wins the lawsuitWith how little spine the majority of consumers (Because you stopped being a customer when you buy into Pokemon) has, it will never die.Add the cherry on top that now more and more shills and fanboys globally are systematically adopting the mindset of the japanese when it comes to criticizing the games, where if you don't have anything positive to say, don't say anything.Fuckers are willingly ready to drown out issues with a front of toxic positivity because it became their identity. But that's a fat problem because positive reinforcement for doing the absolute bare minimum isn't improving the world. If anything it's lowering the standard for what is acceptable.There are systematically only benefits if only a single mainline game doesn't make the profit cut.It will force everyone involved in the production of the game to re-evaluate (Because the slight delay to ZA showcased that Gamefreak can't be fucked to do anything worthwhile with any leeway they get beyond the usual three years). Please, simply sit out on buying one Gen of games.
>>59240503>Please, simply sit out on buying one Gen of games.Good luck getting it across to the vast demographics who buy it no matter the state it is in. You're right but you can't beat stupidity with words alone.
>>59240470Delusional schizo thread
>>59240470After shit like SV, yeah gotta agree
>>59240503>Add the cherry on top that now more and more shills and fanboys globally are systematically adopting the mindset of the japanese when it comes to criticizing the games, where if you don't have anything positive to say, don't say anything.oh so you mean the right way things should be done for mundane things like this? serious matters yes, those deserve to be criticised, like the whole "murking people over pokemon cards" thing. but for video games? really?
>selfish zoomer retard proves why she's an entitled selfish retard
>>59240470>wants Pokemon to die right as they’re turning the boat around Kys
>>59240762>but for video games? really?Sword and Shield, infamous dex cut. Their excuse for it? "High-quality Animation", disproven before the game even was out. The Public Response? #Thankyougamefreak which greenlights bad work results because who cares about the people behind the games, they make money anyway.Scarlet and Violet, one of the few games where the publisher Nintendo had to make an public reminder about their refunding policy on social media, which translates into "We know the game is in a shitty shape, you get your money back more easily in this case". The response? Yappermouthing the 10 million in 3 days without addressing any criticism about the gameplay, story, graphical presentation and technical issues, using a metrit that endorses a bad standard in development once again as a shield against criticism. Any major improvement was outsourced to the raw hardware of the switch 2 rather than their own patches (Where one reduced the amount of spawning Pokemon to reduce the amount of crashes)ZA, basically was given more time than the earlier two entries. The result? A graphical let down, bad DLC, new battle style looped back into the same button mashing with only one minor adjustment every tenth battle.How is a product supposed to improve if the standard keeps getting lowered on social ground of "Please think about the 'small' company"? You give it what it's due, not what it could be.
>>59240790I dunno. You weren't that arsed they were shitting out a game a year in your childhood, but all of a sudden since you grew up, out of their target demograhic and out their concern, you've been bitching heavens hard about something you don;t even have to continue following. Says more about your nature than about Game Freak, given you're STILL here expecting change (normal cunts LOVED SV, given it DID sell itself to 28m people. Nintendo told shitheels crying they had a refund policy for a reason. To tell the autistic obsessed cunts to take their money back and fuck away off).
>>59240812>You weren't that arsed they were shitting out a game a year in your childhoodWhere the fuck did I said that. I judge the games on their own, not based on previous entries. Stop deflecting by doing a "YOU HAD NO PROBLEM BACK THEN", how is it wrong to expect the bare minimum and going by THEIR word? Shouldn't they be held accountable? The whole "You're not the demographic" is bullcrap, most people who buy it are still adults and no amount of insinuation or deflection is gonna change that.
>>59240762>>59240812(You)
>>59240503What is baffling the whole leaps of justifications for stuff like pricing when there were better examples by the previous console.
>>59240470We would need mass executions of millennial Americans for that to happen But I like your spirit
