[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: FB_IMG_1777880378013.jpg (122 KB, 861x861)
122 KB JPG
how do you feel about mixed attackers?
>>
>>59240691
They’re worthless unless they have bloated BSTs or are minmaxed with min defenses and in maxed offenses and speed. Competent devs could make mixed attackerinb be a consistently good niche but game freak has lazy pedophiles not competent devs.
>>
and thats how calyrex ice was born
>>
>>59240691
Fodder until gamefreak release a side game where the versatility matters.
>>
>>59240702
Imo the big issue is that GF keeps giving everything too much coverage. Remove half the coverage options, make coverage a differentiation tool. For example Garchomp gets mostly water moves.

It will both make individual pokemon more interesting to take in your team instead of being able to just pick the one with the higher BST. Also having mixed attackers now becomes more important, as you can't just brute force your way over a physical wall with your physical coverage for example.

Needs some tweaking to make stall less a problem but I think this would be a good step forward, now that games have 1000 characters to pick from.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.