[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HHSIeEmakAEwqLO.jpg (606 KB, 1500x1875)
606 KB JPG
Type diversity? Power level? Distribution?
>>
>>59250361
Fagonite is so ugly
>>
The less mons in the dex the better it is
>>
>>59250361
All matter. but power level is the most important. No one wants to put up with shitmons. Also distribution is important so once what good is a pokemon is you can’t used it, but if a pokemon is strong enough it can be justified to be rare. Finally type diversity
>>
>>59250361
All three work.
Type diversity is important. Sinnoh suffers from this
Distribution is important. Weaker Pokémon should be more common early in, while stronger ones are usually later on, or rare.
Power level is next. It's not too important but still needs to be considered
>>
All three.

>>59250439
This.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.