[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1765238184388947.png (33 KB, 212x238)
33 KB PNG
Instead of using smogon tiers like NU, UU, OU, we put all Pokemon in the same bracket and use maximum level for balancing.
So for example, Scizor may be level 45, but Butterfree may be level 60.

Levels will be adjusted by a committee who oversees use rates, winrates, etc.
>>
this is just scalemons but gay
>>
>>59280732
Scalemons is terrible because BST is not enough to adjust for viability.
>>
>>59280736
neither is level as randbats already proved
>>
>>59280740
Levels are hardly why randbats suck lol
>>
>>59280744
it still proves level doesn't work for balancing retard
>>
>>59280736
What do you think scaling levels does?
>>
>>59280755
because putting everyone on same BST is not enough*
>>
>>59280767
Answer the question. What do you think level scaling does? It affects exactly three things.
>>
>>59280777
I think I'll wait for someone more intelligent.
>>
>>59280781
Scalemons doesn't give everything the same BST, btw.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.