When they were first announced as game mascots of the legends games, I was very excited coz I love them very much. What do you think of the mascot for the next legends game? Discuss.
>>59285137Eternatus will be the next legends mascot, according to teraleak.
>>59285402Hopefully they do more with Eternamax, I want him to go full scorched earth crazy
As obvious as the original dragon being the mascot of legends unova is, I kind of hope it's something like Victini or Genesect
>>59285137Why was PLA so liked while ZA got shitted on hard?
>>59286625because it's shit...?
>>59285402>>59285437If we're going all over, I wish they'd do Unova. I don't give a shit what anyone says, it's the most intersting region by far
>>59285600I think that could be plausible,, could even be keldeo or meloetta even.
>>59285600>as obvious as [thing we have confirmation Game Freak never bothered their arses to conceptualise beyond "it was a thing once in lore but it broked"] happening
>>59285437>>59285600>>59286663Shut up everyone, it is his time to shine in the next legends game. Long live the king!
>>59285402Watch them give it some faggy name like Pokemon Legends MAX or something.
>>59286625Legends Arceus had better mechanics and less handholding. The real time catching was actually innovative while retaining the turn based battle system that made the series the juggernaut it is. It also completely aped BotW's artstyle. ZA plays like a modern pokemon game, overbearing handholding, dogshit artstyle and all.
>>59286625>>59286634>>59287910PLA has like 3 battles in the entire game, the most fun part of pokemon is battling, thus, Z-A is better, I don't understand why PLA is sucked off so much, the literal only fun parts of that game were when Ingo was around battling you, they fucking rebuilt the entire battle system for there to be only 3 trainer battles in the entire game, literally pointless game, why the fuck would i go around catching 10 magikarps instead of doing fun battles? I guess this is only my opinion but I seriously don't understand how you play all the mainline pokemon games which are battle-focused and then go and say "yes pla is fucking peak" despite it having 1 ingo battle, 1 ingo rematch, and 1 volo final battle, thats it, all else is filler, it fucking sucks man I don't get this dicksucking it receivesdoes Z-A have shitty retarded tutorials that are too long? yes, does it have a bunch of battles and thus more fun? also yes, plus, actual developed characters as well, again, ALL that legends:arceus has is INGO AND VOLO, AND INGO ISN'T EVEN A FUCKING ORIGINAL CHARACTER!!!!!! I can not comprehend this, please explain to me why you guys seriously prefer legends arceus over z-a, I don't get it, what is the point, where is the fun in running around an empty open world catching the same pokemon over and over and over????? why would you ever do that instead of trainer battles? I dont get it whatsoever, PLA feels like a tech demo, while Legends Z-A feels like a good game dragged down by completely moronic handholding which should have a skip button because this series is fucking 30 years old already I know how to fucking play pokemon
>>59285437Similar to eternal floette, Eternamax Eternatus will be unlocked after the credits roll.
>>59287869Gross
>>59286625ZA is legit shit, also I want to go back to the past, since they didn't do shit with a more modern Lumiose
>>59287910I like Arceus overall but the battle's are less interesting then za to me, za keeps most of the interesting dynamics from the mainline like how switching in can be used to sponge a hit while defensive type interactions basically don't exist in LA because of how the turn order works and za adds time and positioning on top but i do get that some people dislike it since making it real time gives less time to consciously interact with the type chart or make a gameplan, and LA for a game that's very focused around catching has a rather small dex and legendaries could probably be integrated in a more interesting way then them just being there.
