[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vp/ - Pokémon


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1773954201696376.png (764 KB, 843x1186)
764 KB PNG
How would you feel if gen 10 was composed of mostly cross-gen lines? prevos and evos of older mons as the bulk of the roster; like 60-70 new cross-gen mons. Then throw 35-50 new ones in. You know, for the anniversary. A few from each gen.
>>
>>59292776
I really do not want pre-evos filling up the dex, 1 to 5 pre-evos is fine, too many is too much and would actually be sad if given to pokemon that already evolve, meaning their evolution wont be able to evolve further

cross-gen evos are great, i would be happy, but they should add an offensive eviolite alternative too
>>
File: my-image (12).png (1.18 MB, 1140x1286)
1.18 MB PNG
This is the fullest extent I could see cross-generational evolutions a pre-evolutions being implemented for. I counted something like 106. There would be some variability of course, so take something like 20 in either direction for what could be valid contenders.
>>
>>59292782
>but they should add an offensive eviolite alternative too
dat light ball special
>>
>>59292782
Tauros and Miltank really need a common pre-evo. Kangaskhan needs a pre-evo and a male split evolution



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.