This looks great but is absurdly shallow and barely a gameWhy are people praising the lack of gameplay density in this?
>>11998459Reviewers suck at games and hate playing them. So they will praise any game that doesn't have gameplay and looks good. Now you know the terrible truth.
>>11998459It's an action game, they're played to a specific length.
>>11998459warning
>>11998523huh?The game is beautiful, no doubt about that, but there's nothing resembling gameplayIt's a tech demo really
>>11998525i mean caution
>>11998464Fuck, this actually makes sense
>>11998526Are you the dev or something lmao
>>11998530yes
>>11998538You did a fine tech demo, but there's no real game
>>11998525If it made it to retail, it's not a tech demo. What is it "demoing"?
>>11998539I bet you say this about Space Invaders.
>>11998528That is why I only skim reviews for technical issues or gameplay footage (muted).
>>11998459>gameplay densityAnybody who says this is a faggot
>>11998525>there's nothing resembling gameplayWhy do you come here to vomit out retarded statements?
>>11998826>>11998830Compared to actually good rail shooters Omega Boost is severely lacking and shallow, it just astounds me it's praised this highly
>>11999367>Compared to actually good rail shootersLike?
>>11999367All a game has to be is fun.
>>11998459It was a $20 game and pretty badass.
A bunch of empty statements here. What a non issue
>gameplay densityI am going to kill whoever started this meme
more games need covers like this. just g u n and some vaguely badass character. but also g u n
