In our opinion, video games obviously don't age, since what people enjoyed in visuals, music, gameplay etc. 30 years ago, can still be enjoyable for people today, because we are still the same beings as we were 30 years ago! What can age however, is the aspect of novelty which a game could've had in the past: for example, Wolfenstein 3D was seen differently back in the day, becsuse it's 3D effect was novel, and could have added enjoyment. Now hardly anyone would be impressed by Wolf 3Ds graphics (except of course, by appreciating the time it was released in, and thus it's technical achievement). So this aspect of the game, really did age. What didn't age though, are the games qualities beyond it's novelty. The gameplay, the visuals, the music, etc. are still just as enjoyable (or unenjoyable, if you feel so) as they were in the 90s! We think this settles the issue quite nicely.
I love Wolf 3D music
It aged poorly. Only remembered for cheap "novelty" (wasn't even the first painted portrait with a smile), and the controversy of its theft. If Peruggia hadn't stolen it (later recovered), no one would give a shit about this drab piece of shit, which is why no one did for 80% of its life.
>In our opinionOk faggots
Games don't age, the opinions of retard do.When someone says a game "aged" what they mean is "this isn't like today's standards!". Today's standards being shit, when someone says a game "aged" that's actually a compliment. The less a game is like modern gaming the better.
