>>12051937
They're made for little kids, go play a real game instead

>>12051937
>Channel has comfy vibes but is pretty ass as a game.
>Colosseum has amazing music and fun gameplay as it is double battles only. It's also hard for a Pokemon game because the available mons are pretty ass and so are their movesets. TMs with good moves are very rare until the lategame.
>Gale of Darkness is pretty much Colosseum, just with better gameplay and a worse story.

I would argue Colosseum and Gale of Darkness are worth playing.

>>12051937
Everyone was expecting Nintendo to swoop in and fix the Gamecube's lack of JRPGs with a true mainline Pokemon game for home console. In that context these games were shocking, one could consider them a dereliction of duty even.

>>12051963
Not true since pokefags will eat whatever scat nintendo feeds them

I only played Colosseum and I thought it sucked

They're alright, but definitely not worth whatever reseller fags are selling them for right now

>>12052008
yes but it was still seen as a blunder at the time. Frankly colosseum sucked imo, every battle was slow as hell, catching shadow pokemon was a pain in the ass, purifying them was a huge waste of time, getting ho-oh was a huge waste of time. Pretty much everything in this game was a waste of time. I only put up with the bare minimum to get the exclusive mons that weren't in ruby. Soundtrack is good though. tl;dr 3/10 I would never touch it again and wish I had been able to just play HeartGold instead to get the 2nd gen mons, but those games didn't exist for another 7 years. Another shit game they forced you to buy to complete the dex during the clusterfuck that was 3rd and 4th gen