Early-mid 2000s PC resolutions were soulful for gaming800x600848x4801024x7681280x7201280x7681280x10241360x7681440x9001680x1050
800x600 is the best retro resolution, makes me want to get a 1920x1200 monitor for playing retro games on modern systems
1600x1200 4eva biotcheez
>>12053931>needing more than 640x480kids...
>>12053931>800x600>1024x768most soulful resolutions.>1440x900that's my current one, but i'm not a fan of big screens.
>>120539352304 x 1440
>>12054027Yeah big screens are overrated asf
i was playing an old game on an old laptop and i had forgot how tall the screens used to be. the screen was almost a square. what is that just 3:4? 4:3? it was actually pretty kino and in retrospect its probably why i ejoyed using THIS website so much in the 2000s, because with more vertical real estae you could see more at once. but it isnt like a shitty smartphone resolution either so you have the width to display whatever you need.do older 2000s games just get stretched to fit on modern tvs?
>>120540374:3 is standard "full frame". Some games will stretch, depends on the game and also how you have your GPU configured, etc.
>Retro resolutionsDon't be stupid, resolutions are of all times, there are games from as early as 1997 that support resolutions up to 2048x1536 directly
>>12054273Wow I'm glad I can play my low poly ps1 game at 4k
>>12054027>1024x768Maximum resolution that should exist for gaming. Widescreen is great for movies. It simply doesn't work for games.
>>12054027based 1440x900 chad
>>12053931it's 320x240, 640x480 and above that you might as well do native
>>12054559>It simply doesn't work for games.Explain your reasons
>>12053956The only way to play DOS 320x200 games with 4:3 aspect ratio correction on LCD without distortion.
>>12054749What about 2048x1536?
>>12053931>800x600The max resolution for some 2D games.>848x480Frequently seen in Virtualdubmod>1024x768Old reliable.>1280x720>The Xbox 360 _IS_ HD!>1280x768>Is this considered sidescreen?>1280x1024Counter-Strike: Source never looked so crisp.>1360x768Why does Rozen Maiden not fill up the screen on this hp laptop?>1440x900Whoa this seems like a weird one, I shouldn't touch this.>1680x1050I used this until 2020.
>>12054749>LCD 1600x1200 was a common resolution for mid-high-end CRTs during the mid-00s.
>>12054749that, or a 3840x2400 screen like what my laptop has
>>12053931>1280x720>1280x768>1360x768>1440x900>1680x1050Get that trash out of my face
>>12054719Have you experienced both on the same game? Standard resolution feels natural, it's the way retro games were designed for, meant to be played for. Widescreen feels forced, fake.
>>12055032Your feelings aren't prove of anything
>>12055062Your brain has been rotted by positivism and analytical "philosophy".
>>12055032agreed but that's a different claim than " It simply doesn't work for games"1280x1024 is king btw
>>12055219>Le brain rot Kys buzzwordfaggot
>>12055265>1280x1024 is king btwIndubitably
>>12055265>1280x1024It's very nice!
1680x1050 was extremely comfy
>>12054214Starwars battlefront 1 from like 2004 or whatever on some old dell laptop from 2001
>>12053956luved me Viewsonic A90 flickering at 60hz at that resolution
