how do they compare?i've heard that V revolutionized the dungeon crawling genre and has things the original doesn't, but i don't know if they included those things in the wizardry 1 remake
>>12121002The remake is a complete shit-tastic retard dumb-fuck spergmess. Heart of the Maelstrom is pretty good.
>>12121990explain how the digital eclipse remake is badi was told by someone else not to trust people with that opinion
>>12122710You should decide these things for yourself anon. If you really cared you'd find out instead of relying on other opinions that aren't your own.
>>12121002I would play Wizardry 5 over the remake any day of the week. Play the SNES version.
>>12122710I'm sure it's alright. It's wizardry. But bear in mind that Wizardry, the fun of it, starts to break down once there are too many so-called 'quality of life' additions. It just wasn't designed with them in mind so part of the experience, ai'd say the fun, is lost.Also, that remake in particular is visually not so great in my opinion. The character portraits for example are universally boring and mostly unsuitable. You made a dwarf? Here are twelve human portraits for him. Two of them have facial hair. In my opinion, you are better off playing one of the more atmospheric remakes, like the playstation/saturn one, which has the first three scenarios and wonderful monster artwork.
>>12125317You can turn off the QOL stuff for the original experience.
>>12125334Oh yeah I forgot about that. I haven't played since it came out so I don't remember if you can be selective about what you turn off.
>>12123485I need other people's opinions, they nourish me.
is having all the extra classes like bard, ranger and alchemist worth playing wizardry 6?
