Was it a sequel, a remake or a re-imagining?
>>12136930Pay attention to the shape of the moon in 1 vs 4.When Simon resurrected Drac to kill him again (lol?) in 2, he created a multiverse
Why in the name of Skibidi would it be called IV if it was a remake? It's a sequel, QED.
>>12137004It has the same title in Japan and the apparently the stories are the same in the (JP) manual/game's intro.
>>12136930All of the above in different ways.Also it's too easy.
>>12136930Remake
both, like how Metal Gear Solid is both a sequel and a remake to Metal Gear 2: Solid Snake
It’s the fourth one. The real question is what are 5,6,7 and 8? And which games are just side-stories?
>>12137606>It's too easyPlay on hard mode and use only 2d whipping. I can assure you the game will be more challenging.
>>12136930it was a conceptual reimplementation
Its up!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMT1DoGtBN8
I remember some Anon saying that CV4 was a remake according to IGA whilst it's director called it a sequel. What's the source of these claims?
A sloppy demake
it is superior to Bloodlines, that's for sure
>>12138362true minus versailles and the penultimate section where screen fractures, FUCK those levels. also spear guy is the best character in all of the classicvanias.
It's probably the worst 16 bit Castlevania game.
>>12138375true minus the rng bridge in level 8
>>12138380Probably but still better than most other games. A tasty treat.
It's probably the best 16 bit Castlevania game.
>>12138392? Wut? You just hold right
>>12136930James was right, this is the best castlevania pre sotn. It just feels good to play. 1-3 do deserve praise for being high tier nes games too
>>12138490even if your defense was true that means it's a bad mechanic in a different way
>>12138519You do know that he rode the short bus until he was 16 years old, right?