Is there a reason to still play the original when we have REmake?
Yes, it's better in every way except technologically. The original is designed around replay value and discovery, the remake is designed to impress first time players with no regards for how negatively the things it added or changed impacted replays.
>>12242891Yeah they're wildly different games
It was good. And it was fun. I enjoy playing both, I just naturally play the originals 99% of the time.
>>12242891It's a better experience anyway to play the remake after beating the original. They change many things around to mess with the player if you are too familiar with the original I like the live action sequences too which are something I wish the sequels had kept using
>>12242905>Yes, it's better in every wayNo way, dude.
They're surprisingly different experiences. if you wanna go even further, you can play the Director's Cut versions' Arrange/Advanced mode, which is probably the hardest difficulty in any RE game, at least as Chris
>>12243026excluding gimmick difficulties like invisible enemies mode
>>12242891>Is there a reason to still play the original when we have REmake?I played the remake first and enjoyed it enough to beat it several times, but these days I prefer replaying the originalThey're different enough that neither of them makes the other pointless
>>12243026>Director's Cut versions' Arrange/Advanced mode, which is probably the hardest difficulty in any RE game, at least as ChrisThat was my experience. The underground passage with the 3 Hunters is fucking brutal when you don't expect them
>>12242961was she ever found?
>>12242905fpbpMaybe some bored hero will make a patch to remove most of the padding, that would be fun.
Buy an ad, Sam
>>12242905Good summation anon
>>12242961>It's a better experience anyway to play the remake after beating the original. They change many things around to mess with the player if you are too familiar with the original But doesn't it work the other way around too?
do you even know where you are?the original is a time capsule of its timepeople play it BECAUSE it's old.what a dumb fucking thread
>>12242891Sexier jill
Julia Voth has a prettier face than Inezh.
>>12242891No Crimson Heads
>>12242905>the original is designed around replay value and discoverySo is the remake.
>>12242891No.
>>12243098Yes, by this point everyone's privacy was violated.
>>12242891you get to play two fun versions of a good game
>>12243098yeah, she still looks beautiful
>>12244812Since the hack, the board has been filled with brown zoomers who hate the subject theme of the board and will only play 6th gen crap
>>12244759I suppose so. At any rate you should definitely play both at least once. Try to play the original release version of the 90's RE1 though if you can. The later revisions of the PS1 game had a different soundtrack that is definitely worse. It's unfortunately the only version available on the Playstation stores now.Has anyone here played the PC GOG version? Which soundtrack does it have?
>>12242961>It's a better experience anyway to play the remake after beating the original. They change many things around to mess with the player if you are too familiar with the originalThis, the remake isn't just a remake, it's a response to the original. The remake assumes you know the mansion layout and puzzle logic and it plays off those preconceived notions. The changes are great, but they work better as a subversion of expectations. Plus you can beat the original in just a couple of days, so just do it.
Yes it's called not caring