25 years of progressively worse sequels
>>12264895I thought 4 was supposed to be the best one
>>12264895I only play Civ2. Simple as.
>>12264984i play it on psone where it’s not as good but i don’t care. i use ps3 backwards compatibility and unlimited memory cards. simple as
>>12265002I play Civ 1 on an Amiga emulator while paying a mexican hooker to perform cock and ball torture on me. I don't pay her afterward.
>>12264895I stopped playing Civ3 when my tank got demolished by an enemy samurai.
>>12264972It needed expansions to get there. Only Civ II was a straight up improvement across the board.
>>12264895Civ 5 is best solely because of hexagonal tiles
>>12264895V is the best Civ game though.
>>12264895The computer civs straight up cheats in 3.
>>12264984Civ3 is everything you like about Civ2 but 10x better>>12264972Civ4 is an abomination>>12265089>>12265092Hexagonal tiles are the only thing Civ3 would have benefitted from. Literally everything else is playskool-tier failure
>>12265575The evolving costumes were one aspect I wish they had kept in later games.
>>12265575>Civ3 is everything you like about Civ2 but 10x betterThe biggest change in Civ 3 that drains the fun out of the game is the lack of zone of control. Keeping foreign units off your lawn is way more tedious than in 2. The changes to research are questionable too.
>>12265575>Civ4 is an abominationExplain
>>12265574it cheats in every civ games
