Brazilians are being based again
https://github.com/ran-j/PS2Recomp
Is this possible?
>have an idea for unlimited food, energy and happiness for all of humanity>doesn't work yet but work has begun
>>12346137Pc are not powerful enough to run ps2 games natively
>>12346154Why not?
>>12346154>no guys you can't run 25 year old games on current hardware! it's just not powerful enough!
>>12346154>Pc are not powerful enough to run ps2 games nativelymoron https://opengoal.dev/
>>12346154
>>12346157Ps2 had custom hardware with a 2560-bit wide memory bus its simply not possible yet
>>12346137Brazil wins
Now matter how much trannies and latinxes illegally molest the insides of ps2, you can never properly replicate the sovl and power of the emotion engine
>>12346182it doesn't matter what hardware features it had. that was more than a quarter century ago. you weren't even born yet.you sound like those titor conspiracy theorists that think th pc-98 had some secret feature that let a computer from the early 90s magically become powerful enough to run a time machine.
>>12346137>againwhat was the first time?
>>12346197dick got stuck in ps2 disc drive
>>12346195You're replying to the PS2schizo, anon. It's the dude who claims the PS2 was the most powerful console of its generation (despite the consensus being that it was the weakest by a significant margin, not counting the Dreamcast) and always spams the same webms in his bait threads.
>>12346186This is not a Brazilian. This is Belle Delphine larping as an Indio. Stop being a coombrain and stop accepting memes as reality.
>>12346182GPUs today are multithreaded. The same amount of data can be pushed through a single 128-bit bus on a modern card.
>>12346137It's cool being Brazilian sometimes.
>>12346197>what was the first time?The SOULJA BOY console
>>12346197
>>12346195It matters because ps2 is fundamentally different from modern hardware
>>12346224N64 architecture is fundamentally different from modern hardware, yet there are N64 games running perfectly fine on modern PCs.
>>12346137It's gonna be interesting seeing later games get ported.
>>12346227N64 was extremely weak off the shelf SGI box nothing special. Ps2 was made by Sony engineers from the ground up
>>12346231>from the ground upit was literally built off the ps1.
>>12346235Which was powered by an off-the-shelf RISC CPU
>>123461372 more weekerinhos
>>12346237which only furthers my point
>>12346195> th pc-98 had some secret featureno that was the IBM 5100, the PC-98 is the secret vault of eroge to keep you tethered during the long flights
>project is not ready yetwhat could go wrong
>THING IS HAPPENING>OK IT'S JUST BEGINNING, WORK'S AT 0.1% AND IT WILL PROBABLY NEVER HAPPEN BUT BE EXCITED NONETHELESS!
>>12346137This huehue used AI to make this, so don't expect it to work well or at all, there's a reason there's no further information and not released.
>>12346258Yeah but they said the same thing for SEGA 32X emulation on the Wii which now runs at 100% on most games with few errors.
It's weird how the ps2 has very few passion projects going on, while far less popular systems have tons of them.
>>12346776When you consider that there's tons of PS2s out there from it being one of the most-selling consoles of all-time and that they continue to work and that the first PS3s played PS2 games, it makes more sense.
>>12346137>PROJECT IS NOT READY YET, but the work has begunbrown intelligence4 letter word starting with s and ending in e
>>12346776The PCSX2 has always been good for most games. It got huge improvements in the last 5 years, making the original hardware almost trivial at this point. Original hardware modding has evolved from modchips, HDDs, USB, and now, memory cards. The recent MMCE exploit with memcardpro/sd2psx/ps2memcardgen2 has made things super easy and accessible. Just have one of these, a good micro SD card, and you're good to go.
>>12346154This is actually true
>>12346229Did you unironically post an AI chatbot screenshot?
>>12346207Well, the PS2 wasn't THAT weak. It had a complex architecture that made it hard for multiplatform devs to utilize. And it was the second oldest of the generation. Many games look better on PS2 than Gamecube, Even if they run worse.
>>12346207>>12347225I feel like the PS2 and GameCube are actually pretty close. People use the RE4 port as proof that the GC has superior hardware, but I think it would make more sense to just look at the best looking games of each system instead of using a game made for one console then ported to different hardware afterwardsIf there's a power gap it's absolutely between the Xbox vs the other two
>>12347425I agree, using the RE4 port to prove the GameCube is more powerful is kind of unfair. Considering it was meant to be a GC exclusive and was then rushed out due to poor sales for the GC version. The Gamecube was a bit more powerful, but the PS2 had some tricks up it's sleeve as you can see in Gran Turismo 4 and the Jak games.
>>12346137so theoretically decomped PS2 games would have system requirements close to those of PCs at the time?
>>12347575No not even modern PC can run Ps2 games with all effects on
>>12347575Yes and noRecomps usually run very well, but the devs don't bother targeting period PC hardware and software either, so it probably won't run on an early 00s XP machine due to various reasons including graphics APIs used for the ports
>>12347580and yet they can be emulated flawlessly on modern PCs, which is a more intensive feat
>>12347585i'm happy with them just running nicely on low end PCs, which i could definitely see as a priority if brazilians are behind the project
>>12347589Emulation is an approximation where it fakes the games. Its glitchy with missing effects and speed issues
>>12347598emulation is software that acts the same way the original hardware does. it has nothing to do with the games. the most popular ps2 emulator can play more than 99% of the original library without any of the issues you mention.
>>12347608Absolute delusional
>>12347613yes, yes you are.
>>12347597YeahIf your question is "Will those ports run on my 10 year old machine?" then yes, they probably will
>>12346137that's cool and all but but pcsx2 plays every game i throw at it on a free micro pc i got from e-waste
>>12347598>Emulation is an approximation where it fakes the games. Its glitchy with missing effects and speed issuesIt literally depends on the emulator. For example there's practically no significant difference between a real NES and a modern NES emulator, which is why emulators are allowed for SMB1 speedruns for example
>>12347494>rushed out due to poor sales for the GC versionThe GC version wasn't even out when they announced a PS2 port was coming, let alone when they started making it. I still remember the tendie butthurt about how Capcom's announcement possibly prevented people from buying more Gamecubes.
Big if true
let me know when it runs on Apple silicon
>>123461972 Girls 1 Cup
>>12346182Hi Sega&AMD
>>12346154Powerful is the wrong term
apple systems have a.i. that can translate x86 cpu code on the fly. big if true.
>>12346137Large if factual.>Steambot Chronicles plz
>>12346165> dot devcrin/g/e
>>12347425Wasn't the PS2 port just, you know, rushed?
>>12347494>Le Gamecoob version sold poorlyHow much did the dumb morons of Mikami and Capcom expected it to sell? Halo meme sales (4M and up 1st week), the game did sold over one million in GCN enough to get a players choice reprint right?
>>12350172You don't have to like old hardware, be thankful.
>>12346217that's the only good thing about Brazil
>>12347631speedrunner organizations are a fucking joke anon you really brought up those groups of retards to prove some kind of point?
>>12346141>note this is an experiment and doesn't workbrazilians scamming again and everyone falling for it.
>>12352461I trust autistic speedrunners who do SRMs and ACEs more than some random Anonymous retard on 4chan (You)
>>12352470those same retards allow shit like wii virtual console glitches that don't happen on an actual n64.they allow bullshit for convenience instead of being full purists. don't take speedrunners seriously or use them as an example to follow ever again.