Why is this site used as a source everywhere when they cite zero sources? Some stuff it seems can be verified but they offer no explanations for what verification methods were used for which game, and concretely proven games are listed right next to games that are essentially a hunch based on similar code. These guys are troublemakers aren't they?
Yep. You know how everyone claims (or claimed, but some still do) Power Blade 2 was developed by Natsume?All because GRDI made an assumption and everyone used that as a source. Meanwhile, Nastume's website lists all the games they made: no Power Blade 2. Only 2 devs who worked on Power Blade 2 also worked with Natsume, including one who's a composer who hadn't worked with Nastume yet when Power Blade 2 was made. The most likely assumption is that the one programmer is either a contractor who worked for both companies, or went from Taito to Natsume, but instead GRDI just assumed "Natsume had to have made this game because of this one guy!" and it leaked over every other website.
>>12387936>Why is this site used as a source everywhereBecause "everywhere" is wherever children like you hang out?>they cite zero sources?Wouldn't know. Don't think I've even heard of it until now. That's how pathetic the little bubble you're living in is.
>>12387936who even are these faggots? who funds them? never heard of 'em before.
>>12387989same
>>12387989>>12388010b-b-but their used as a source everywhere!!!!1!
>>12387946Oh yeah, everyone knows that, it was a huge controversy that irreparably damaged the credibility of the game developer institute.
>>12388167What?
>autist having a spergoutDay ending in y.But yeah, people really don't do research on video games, OP.
>>12389182What do you mean what?
This site has so much wacky garbage lol.
>>12389182>being that kid who keeps saying "what?"
>>12390948Son, I am not disappoint
>>12390993
>>12387946So who made Power Blade 2? Wikipedia lists no developer.
