>>12400258
>precious works of art
thats your misconception thinking art means mona lisa hanging in a museum and art is a term that denotes "preciousness" and something cannot be art if it sucks. Do some research on the topic there are thousands of years of information about art.

They're corporate products made for profit.

>>12400258
post favorite “classic Renaissance paintings and sculptures” lets see your art history brilliance anon

>>12400265
Let's see there's uhh.. Mona Lisa.. and The Last Supper.. and David.. the list could go on

>>12400263
Just like how classic paintings and sculptures were commissioned for a fee, and not made in leisure

>>12400263
>If an effort to create a product is corporative it automatically means it can't be art/soul.
You're missing the point. Corporations used to be formed by passionate designers, musicians, etc. with a vision. Then by genuine videogame players that wanted to push gaming forward to see it evolve. Overtime it became a multi-millionare industry and that's how you get to Fortnite and games made exclusively for profit by economist essentially.

>>12400263
So is most modern art. If you think a banana taped to a wall is anything less than a money laundering avenue you're naive about your own naivety. Most Video games fit the requirements of allowing for expression and interpretation, so they're no less valid than movie slop that ends up getting thrown out as tax writeoffs, let alone the ones people critique openly.

>>12400258
after the nostalgia wears off retro games will be remembered for their novel and innovative programming. the player experience will lose appeal as subsequent releases continue to refine the formula.

Retard

>>12400323
Mona Lisa was actually a commissioned portrait for some royals wife though