[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vr/ - Retro Games

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1714929691316159.jpg (180 KB, 695x695)
180 KB
180 KB JPG
Series that get better with each new installments
>>
Johto was dogshit and Crystal didn't let you catch Mareep.
>>
File: FF.jpg (962 KB, 1584x2112)
962 KB
962 KB JPG
>>12487190
>>
>>12487198
Was 2 really better than 1? Was 8 really better than 7?
>>
>>12487206
Yes
>>
>>>/vp/
>>
>>12487198
Bro final fantasy peaked at 7
>>
>>12487198
>>12487190
pic unrelated?
pokemon went downhill after gen 5
>>
>>12487206
No, 1 is very much the better game. 2 has a much more ambitious storyline, but its level up system is terrible and every re-release has to modify it since it was so bad.
>>
>>12487206
2 and 3 were worse than 1.
8 was worse than 7, but both were worse than 9
>>
>>12487190
A better question is at what point do these games peak. A lot of even trilogy games the best is the second one.
>>
>>12487727
I think most people would say gen 3, but for me, it's gen 2
>>
>>12487190
Pic EXTEREMLY not related
>>
>>12487739
Gen 2 for me as well, it's odd how gen 2 was universally accepted as the peak back a decade or two ago but now there are so many contrarians around
>>
>>12487776
NTA but context around the games have changed. When people go back to it they're expecting something more in the paradigm of gen 3-5 or gen 6-7 when really gen 1 and gen 2 are kind of their own experiences. Also, you have different groups having different gripes, nuzlockers get get assmad because some other gens are better for that for example..

Pretty sure most people still are fond of the games though.
>>
>>12487190
They could have easily phoned in the GBC and GBA games, but no. They completely revamped everything from the ground up.
>>
>>12487851
What people are fond of in gen 2 is not playing it, but liking *the idea of* going to Kanto and battling Red, neither of which were executed well in GSC.
>>
>>12487776
It was never universal. People who disagreed were just drowned out. I always preferred gen 1 to gen 2, then gen 3 to gen 2.
>>
File: Route_2_GSC_Map.png (31 KB, 320x864)
31 KB
31 KB PNG
>>12488254
gen 2 is the perfect example of "kids have zero standards so we can do anything we want"
>>
>>12488349
My favorite gen is 3, but I don't get what's wrong with this. Explain.
>>
>>12488349
They were so embarrassed they remade it in XY and called it Santalune Forest
>>
Pokemon did get better and better and peaked with 5th gen. When they went 3D, there was a sharp decline and it was downhill since
>>
>>12488446
Nah gen 5 was the begin of the end, linear pretentious bullshit with awful pokemon designs people only praise because of the PWT
>>
File: Johto_Route_37_GSC.png (11 KB, 320x288)
11 KB
11 KB PNG
>>12488349
Route 37 is also pretty bad. Gold and Silver is painfully small. The main game suffers and Kanto is ass, it's just lame.
>>
>>12488349
Gen 2 was pretty great when I was a kid who had standards. Like any kids that had parents who loved them, I could only play video games for a limited time each day. The daily events and chores really made the game stand out to me, as I could "play" even while not playing. I knew that each day I could get Kurt started on another ball, do the bug catching contest, or run into one of the weekday siblings to get a unique item. The amount of optional content is really cool too. It really felt like the world was full of tiny interesting secrets.
>>
File: Pokemon_FRLG_Route_7.png (244 KB, 288x288)
244 KB
244 KB PNG
>>12488465
Because the previous game didn't had bad routes either... at least you got trainers and berries there
>>
>>12488471
This is the first game though, the hope is the sequel does more. The topic is "gets better" doing the same lazy thing isn't better. Also you exit into this route after doing the underground path, which was a clunky way to add more travel time. It should have just been added to the route. Gen 2 doesn't have underground paths.
>>
>>12488479
>it's okay when Kanto does it!
>>
>>12488254
>What people are fond of in gen 2 is not playing it, but liking *the idea of* going to Kanto and battling Red, neither of which were executed well in GSC.
Yeah this schizo is right, everyone just pretended to like gen 2. Kanto sucks and battling Red wasn't hype at all.
>>
>>12488505
>Series that get better with each new installments
Effectively proven wrong if Kanto did it better.
>>
>>12488996
>better
Look at this shit >>12488471
>>
>>12488349
We went over this extensively in the previous thread so I know you will dismiss this because it's not your opinion but I was in my 20's as were the other people I knew playing Pokemon and Gen 2 was universally praised as far better than Gen 1. It was Ruby/Saphire where those who weren't hardcore into it dropped off. So it certainly wasn't kids just accepting it because it's all they know.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.