Is FRLG the only game in the Pokémon series that does not have below average spritework?
>>12491927No, but somehow not retro despite being a 191p handheld from 2004.
>>12491934192p*
Crystal had decent spritework for GBC. Advance gen was hideous.
>>>/vp/
>>12491927What Gameboy rpgs had better sprite work than Gen 1?
Why are there so many low effort lazy troll threads on this board right now?
>>12491927I honestly prefer how RSE look, lots of Pokemon look much more dynamic there while in frlg they look more static>>12491941Also this, gen 2 has the best spritework in the series, they should have never moved away from the way they colored the battles sprites there
every pedomon game is below average
>>12492721Objectively untrue.
>>12492721Graphically speaking, objectively true. Every fucking mainline pokemon game was pathetically underwhelming compared to what their respective systems were capable of. I don't why people deny this unless they literally only play pokemon
>>12493937Nah gen 2 was peak gbc graphics, specially the Pokémon sprites, meanwhile gen 3 gets shit for being an earlier GBA title not looking as good as Mimish Cap a late GBA entry
>>12492051Robopon
>>12493953Yeah no, that game also run pretty sluggish for some reason
>>12493937gen 1/2 and gen6/7 were graphically advanced
>>12493976>6/7now that's retro
>>12491927>>>/vp/can we please start to ban these threads?
>>12493949Yeah gen 2 totally looked way better than this.>>12493991You might not like it but several Pokemon games are in fact retro.
Frlg is soulless. Hgss are the only good pokemon remakes. It was so good it made people think pokemon remakes weren't a stupid idea
>>12493976Not so much 6 but gen 7 were some of the best looking games on 3ds. If recall they ran like shit on the non new 3ds though
