these are pretty surface level comparisons and I can tell you haven't actually spent much time playing a variety of games on Jaguar/TG16/Saturn/Dreamcast

>>12537230
I thin i'm pretty spot on

I have heard those comparaison tons of times before especially SNES>PS1 and PC engine>Saturn

faggot>OP
-super retarded
-huge faggot

The NES was just a souped up Apple II

>>12537276
This

>Jaguar was declared an open platform back in 2000
>homebrew scene is still dogshit 26 years later
Why doesn't anybody care about the Jaguar, ataribros? :(

>>12537284
Commodore PET*

only one of these that makes sense is dreamcast -> xbox

>>12537374
Meh i think the Xbox has more in common with the N64 than the Dreamcast

>>12537343
>child was declared a total fucking retard back in 2000
>child was born in 2015
>child wonders why nobody cares about its ridiculous shit
Many such children

>>12537276
this.

Actually:
N64 is a spiritual successor to the Sega Genesis
PS is a spiritual successor to the Game Boy
Sega Saturn is a spiritual successor to the SNES and PC Engine

>>12537226
i really like the shape of the Jag and N64

>>12537248
>I think I’m spot on because I’m just regurgitating things I’ve read others say
wow OP, very cool

>>12538091
>Actually:
>i'm a mentally ill child

Lotta meanies itt. Bad energy.

>>12538091
That doesn't make sense at all

>>12537226
Hey OP I like your attempt at discussion. But I disagree with your premise. Spiritual successor means channeling the energy as an intentional sequel, but I think you’re comparing more results than intent. It’s a flawed premise for “spiritual successor” discussion which is what I think is setting people off.

File: 1776839459164185.jpg (51 KB, 349x642)

51 KB JPG

>>12538091

>>12537226
>>12538242
Hardware wise, N64 and Jaguar are actually very similar.
>dual RISC CPU setup
>fully programmable GPU
>single channel memory
>no sound chip
>cartridge ROM
With the N64 having much more expensive internal hardware of course. Jaguar was extremely cost oriented.

>>12537226
Sega Master System to SNES
Later 8 bit system known for lots of colours for people who waited a bit and got the newer system with lots of colours.
From having R-Type to Super R-Type which is a remix of R-Type 2.

>>12538632
Nah you went to far

>>12538668
No, he’s 100% correct. Both consoles that released two years after their biggest competition, and provided few hardware advantages to justify buying over the already established console, and even had some notable disadvantages. Consoles of choice for those who prioritize bright colors over all else.

>>12537226
It's much deeper, in my opinion:

5th generation:
PS1 is half PC Engine (big corpo trying to take over gaming with a console that's weaker than both of their competitors, and trying to 1-up everyone on the technology / media side) and half SNES (giant library of third party games, appealed to every region)

Saturn is half PC-Engine (weeb shit) and half Mega Drive (Arcade focus)

N64 is half SNES (strong first-party library, best graphics) and half Mega Drive (American focus). Jaguar doesn't even enter the discussion.

6th generation:
PS1 > PS2, pretty straightforward

N64 > GameCube (wrong media type, but overall same line of thinking, graphic powerhouse and strong first party)

Dreamcast is half Saturn (arcade focus, usual SEGA stuff) and half PS1 (trying to 1-up everyone technologically)

Xbox is half Dreamcast (trying to 1-up everyone technologically, got some SEGA stuff, appealed to similar demographics in the West), 25% N64 (Focus on America, graphics) and 25% PS1 (corporation attempts to take over gaming)

>>12538839
>with a console that's weaker than both of their competitors

Hum no

>>12538872
talking about the PC Engine or PS1? For PC Engine yeah I get it was supposed to go against the Famicom / NES but at the end of the day true PC Engine 2 didn't really happen and it got released late in America so consider SNES and Mega Drive as its competitor. For PS1, it's weaker than both the Saturn and the N64 in every way, people wrongly use the 'Saturn for 2D and PS1 for 3D' rule but the Saturn is more powerful in every way the multiplats only look uglier on Saturn because developers didn't bother learning to develop for a very complicated system with a small userbase.

>>12538897
>For PS1, it's weaker than both the Saturn and the N64 in every way

No

You clearly don't know what your talking about i suggest you quit here

Dreamcast > Xbox

>>12538947
Anon there's not a single spec where the PS1 beats the Saturn. Theoretically the Saturn is simply more powerful than the PS1, and this is just facts. What happened is that no one bothered learning how to develop for the Saturn. The N64 is obviously more powerful than both. There's no need to be a console warrior for 30 year old systems anon

>>12538991
No PS1 is much faster in handling polygons

>>12537381
Pretty true if you ask me, the similarities really tickle my autism
>more powerful hardware than the competition
>very multiplayer-oriented and full of 4-player party games
>spearheading FPS on consoles (N64 had Goldeneye, Turok, Perfect Dark, Xbox had Halo and Doom III)
>many ports and spinoffs of PC games (Doom 64, Quake II, Command & Conquer, Starcraft 64 / Morrowind, Max Payne, Unreal Championship, Serious Sam, Far Cry Instincts, etc.)
>a lot early adopters of the Xbox and Halo were Goldeneye 4-player splitscreen bros
>3D platformers (N64 obviously had Mario, Banjo-Kazooie, Donkey Kong, Xbox had Blinx, Oddworld Munch's Oddysee, Psychonauts and ToeJam & Earl III which was originally developed for n64 and feels very collectathon)
>flopped in japan and europe, but are american staples
>no JRPGs
>rareware

>>12537960
>child declared retarded 15 years before it's born
Based Minority Report anon