[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vr/ - Retro Games


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 920x1080.jpg (101 KB, 640x480)
101 KB JPG
My cousin told me that Darkstone was better than Diablo and Diablo 2. Is he right?
>>
No, this is what we would call "contrarianism"
>>
>>12574871
>TROLL pic
early 3D is ugly. though in this case, it looks more like zoomed-in Warcraft 3 graphix which didn't age well.
pre-rendered 3D/2.5D > Warcraft 3 tier shit.

i like the 3D water effects though.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4R8YZQ8HAwI

At the time we were all waiting for Diablo II to come out, it was GTA VI of the time and Darkstone helped in the interim. The game was fun and enjoyable, with good multiplayer exerience, random dungeon generation and quest selection. The loading screen was comfy and it was a perfect example, back then, of what you could do with 3D. It deserves to be in the rank of Diablo I and II. Which you consider better is a thing of preference.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.