>>3879103
I have this in my room collection, is it worth playing at all? I don't care about idol shit

>>3879170
It plays fine until late-game when you are just watching the same animations lines over and over. The story is a big bunch of nothing and the main character is meant to be a self-insert but in reality comes across as just a dull person.
Overall 6/10. Fills time but you will forget it all within a month.

>>3879103
It's prototype persona at best.

>>3879103
The only good Fire Emblem game.

>>3879103
>can’t play this (or fire emblem warriors or engage) because I didn’t access the backlog of FE titles that Nintendo never bothered to port and/or translate
Why are they like this?

>>3879103
ah yes, this fusion accident

>>3879103
after being mad for years over what was delivered after what was promised, I did play it and found it was a perfectly okay game. Good combat that needed more depth, bland but inoffensive story and characters
>>3879243
nothing in TMS or either musou are related to the games they haven't released outside of japan

>>3879103
I thought I'd like Barry and be annoyed by Eleonora.
Ended up hating him and loving Eleonora instead.

>>3879170
Play the remaster

Engage is what I hoped mechanically in a FE X SMT game. Rings are basically equippable demons/personas.
While Engage delivered mechanically yet botched its writing, this game is just completely off the rail on everything lol.

>>3879103
never played it, is it any fun?

>>3883154
Yes if you enjoy turn based RPG gameplay

>>3883154
It's a good game but it's centered about idols (gravure/jpop /acting) and might not be for everyone.
Really enjoyed the gameplay, dungeons were okay-ish but it's one of the rare rpg where I used all the party members.
Small tip if you are going to play, don't bother learning healing spells because items are much better.