[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vrpg/ - Video Games/RPG

Name
Spoiler?[]
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File[]
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>no RTWP
>tone and vibe is completely different
>gay
>doesn't even play like a Baldur's Gate game
>>
File: IMG_9076.jpg (50 KB, 736x527)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>3894771
It says turn based in the store tags. You knew what you were buying. Also if you actually read any of the threads about the game on here you would have been able to tell if it’s a game for you or not. You are probably just an indian trying to start a discourse tho
>>
BG3 sucked despite not having RTWP, not because of it.
>>
>>3894771
bearfuckerphobe
>>
>>3894771
This is the best game ever made. Only DOS2 comes close.
>>
It's Original Sin 3, i.e., vastly superior to any RTWP game. Your shit taste is at odds with reality.
>>
>wahhh why wasn't BG3 a pre-buff spam auto-attack simulator
>>
>>3894771
>no RTWP
yeah RTWP is ass, thank god it doesn't have it
>doesn't play like outdated crungy BG2
ok
>gay
no argument from me. it's gay
>>
>>3894774
Still shit
>>
refund it, the fagdom is off the charts
>>
>>3894791
>>3894816
>>3894863
>trooncoded
RTWP is the best possible system for RPGs, except maybe first person for non-party based ones.
>>
>>3894969
>trooncoded
No need to describe your post beforehand.
>>
>>3894771
What i hate the most about BG3 is that retcons the originals while not even allowing you to import save games from them.
>>3894863
>yeah RTWP is ass, thank god it doesn't have it
Can you explain why RTWP control of 6 characters is worse than TB control over 4 or are you just saying stuff you don't understand?
>>
>>3895075
>retcons
Like what?
>import save
Ridiculous, some company ought to build their product around a 20 year old game.
>>3895075
Rtwp is faster, that's the only advantage it has.
>>
>>3895080
>Like what?
The existance of every original BG companion that exists in BG3 is mutually exclusive with the epilouge of Throne of Bhaal.
>Ridiculous, some company ought to build their product around a 20 year old game.
Larian literally went out of their way and called their product a direct continuation of this 20 year old RPG (that itself had save file imports). There is simply no excuse for this.
>Rtwp is faster, that's the only advantage it has.
In contrast TB doesn't have a single advantage whatsoever.
>>
>>3895084
AFAIK the endings are not canon, as there are multiple endings. The characters aren't retconed - maybe viconia age or her aging -, they were assassinated, as in character assassination. Sarevok turned into a meme, it's ridiculous. The guy who wanted to conquer faerun and is strong af, sits in a cellar and waits for tav to patiently answer all the questions tav or the player might have. It's sad. Professional writers thought that's the way to go.
>larian...
Did they? I thought swen was against calling it bg3, but they had to. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to, but it's as unrealistic as it gets.
>tb
It's less hectic. Rwtp can be very hectic and unwieldly at times. One could argue, if implemented properly, like aoo and the like, this disadvantage is an non issue. I'm all for having a switch to chose between either in real time.
>>
>>3894969
The only reason you want RTwP is because you want RPGs to be pre-buff simulators that are built for auto-attack spam. Everything else about RTwP is bloated and unnecessarily obtuse otherwise.
>>
>>3895084
>Larian literally went out of their way and called their product a direct continuation of this 20 year old RPG (that itself had save file imports). There is simply no excuse for this.
This might have to do with the fact BG2 ends off (especially thanks to ToB) with your character being at an extremely high level, so it wouldn't be a good fit to have a new game built on a completely different system famous for its ease of access and grounded low level play to tart you off at the upper end range. Besides the sheer disparity between 5e and AD&D on a mechanical level, it's also worth noting that Baldur's Gate is filled with jank that is really no longer excusable in this day and age. A char gen that grants you infinite rerolls with non-weighted distribution is just bad design by itself, so imagine having to wrestle with the head ache of trying to convert that nonsense after 20+ years of experience.
>>
>>3895144
*to start you off
>>
>>3895144
Aren't they like level 8-10? That's what the team said during ea. They also said that the huge jumping distances are due to the tadpoles. This was all scrapped apparently.
>>
File: rekke.webm (2.67 MB, 1920x1080)
2.67 MB
2.67 MB WEBM
>>3894969
RTWP is ass. its either tedious or a pre-buff autobattler with no reactionary strategy.
>>
>>3895167
That's the end result, isn't it? Anything you can do with Rtwp can be done better with tb. I do prefer a switch though.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.