https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nbqx2fpNcQsWell, well, well. This came out of nowhere. It looks interesting in scope if nothing else, compared to stuff like Wargame, Broken Arrow, Regiments, and all that. It'll probably be shit but it might be worth watching.
>>2169832>Play of Battle SAits a scam
>>2169832Oh hey, I played this like 10 years ago! It's called wargame: airland battle.
>>2169832not a fan of AI generetated stuff desu
>play of battleThat ESL name should be enough of a tell that the game is shit and not even worth looking at.
>>2169848>>2169849>>2170554>>2170558whats with te indians shitting on every new game
>created by polesenjoy russia being nerfed to the oblivion
>>2170858i hope they will put donkeys and chechen barrier troops for RUS deck
>>2170725what's with every new game being an uninspired 1:1 clone of games made 10-20 years ago? Do something new or get shit on.
>>2170889I don't trust this random polish game to be particularly good either, but what exactly is it a clone of?
>>2170913nta, but it looks clearly like a broken arrow,/warno clone with some wider scope for geopolitics (you get hit with an X event and you can choose to escalate or deny it)
>>2170914It seems to have more strategic/geopolitical stuff to it compared to warno/BA.>research tree>no provinces>ability to produce equipment>etc.Which means >>2170889 is wrong because they are in fact doing something different.
