[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vst/ - Video Games/Strategy


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Zero-K_Cover.png (1.39 MB, 1200x1600)
1.39 MB
1.39 MB PNG
The most fun and interesting take on Total Annihilation style RTS.
>>
>>2175841
Solid gameplay and a solid game engine, the only thing holding it back is the graphics. The game is arguably the best TA successor out there and actually feels like a sequel and not just another remake.
>>
supcom is better
>>
Played it for about eighty hours and I feel I've seen everything. The factories especially look superficially different, and because units basically do all the work on their own, every fight looks identical. Nevertheless, it's a cool project that deserves more nerds playing it.
>>
more like ZERO PLAYERS hahahaha!
No but actually it's really good I had a bunch of fun playing skirmishes and some campaign missions with a friend.
>>2176489
Yeah it doesn't really have that "wow every game is different" factor
>>
>>2176403
No arguments here.
SupCom easily bests ZeroK and BAR.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.