[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vst/ - Video Games/Strategy


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: polden_vstprOP.jpg (823 KB, 1920x1080)
823 KB
823 KB JPG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZPIDIoOKhI
https://store.steampowered.com/app/2461280
>>
How many missions in the full game, is there a custom mode like in the og majesty?

I greatly enjoyed the demo
>>
File: Capture.jpg (11 KB, 218x181)
11 KB
11 KB JPG
>>2178955
this isn't the first time someone is parroting age of empires barracks for some reason. I'm pretty sure stormgate had the same kind of building for their human faction.
Why are age of empires designs so strong that everyone wants to copy them? There is nothing exceptionally appealing about the age of empires barracks, so what's the deal?
>>
>>2178955
this is a trademark lawsuit waiting to happen
>>
>>2178955
aesthethically I like it. not sure about gameplay tho
anything brand new in terms of mechanics?
>>
>>2178981
>Age of Empires invented a fucking walled manor
>>
We already had other Majesty clones released. What's the most non-janky one (best mechanics)?
>>
>>2178955
u posted this on /v/ already and got laughed at for being a lazy marketer who didnt even bother edit screenshot name
>>
>>2178955
Ok but why should I play it over majesty?
>>
>>2179057
they hired the voice actor of geralt and the majesty narrator guy
>>
File: HumBarracks.jpg (15 KB, 174x216)
15 KB
15 KB JPG
>>2178981
NOOOOOOO LE HECKIN BARRACKSERINOOOO
>>
i played the demo and it just about scratched the itch but didnt move the gameplay forward in any interesting way. a bit pricey for a mid indie game with ai slop content
>>
File: proxy-image.png (1.27 MB, 948x621)
1.27 MB
1.27 MB PNG
>>2179015
thats correct, age of empires invented square building with lower wall with a cloister that has training dummies inside RTS building archetype. Correct
>>2179098
this is not that design. You are being disingenuous for no reason.
>>
>>2179094
Ok but why should I play it over majesty?
>>
>>2178955
Looks like garbage why do devs go for that ugly blizzshit look
>>
>>2179284
Because Blizzard games are popular
>>
>>2179284
that's what the ai models are shitting out
>>
>>2179266
Manors are a real thing, you know.
And them having provided troops was also a real thing, you know.
>>
>>2179310
Not for a decade
>>
>>2178981
>Why are age of empires designs so strong that everyone wants to copy them? There is nothing exceptionally appealing about the age of empires barracks, so what's the deal?
gee it's almost like the age of empires series is widely considered to have been one of the most defining franchises of the rts genre, with aoe2 still getting expansions to this day
>>
>>2178955
>Majesty
Majesty 2 Clone.

EWWWWWWWWWW
>>
>>2179280
>Why should I play majesty
is the question you should actually be asking if you were more than a reactionary curmudgeon. Majesty is just Warcraft but with a silly gimmick that makes everything worse. You still DO have to micro your heroes in Majesty, because it has the physics and the mechanics of any other RTS, but you're not allowed to.

>Ok but why should I play it over majesty?
If you actually want an answer, because Majesty runs at 24 fps in 800x600 resolution. Lessaria is basically better in every way.

>>2178981
>for some reason.
so what would your barracks look like?
>>
>>2179620
>so what would your barracks look like?
like something actually designed to house a lot of soldiers
search google for "barracks" images and you'll see all kinds of building designs
even if they have a cloister, there's usually housing all around the building, not just in the back and surrounded by non-functional walls in the front and on the sides
>>
>>2179094
And a Fiverr pajeet to AI voicegen everyone else
>>
>>2179788
You autists fixate on the strangest thing I swear lmao
>>
>>2179895
You non-autists accept mediocrity without question and then complain nobody innovates
>>
>>2180112
let's see your innovative ideas now, I can't wait!
>>
File: proxy-image.jpg (50 KB, 390x280)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
>>2180178
behold... a non-aoe2 barracks design
>>
>>2180211
this ain't your idea, I want screenshots from the game you're developing right now
>>
>>2180211
>a stone rectangle with a courtyard
it's literally the same thing
>>
>>2179788
>like something actually designed to house a lot of soldiers
well the knights guild in lessaria houses 3 soldiers.
so i'd reckon they don't need the additional walls around the outside
>>
>>2178991
lolno
>>
>>2180224
gonna need the $ lessaria got to develop its own game chud
>>2180533
if its literally the same thing, then troons who cut off their dick are the same as women (protip: they aren't and you are a moron)
>>
>>2182782
back to your containmentboard
>>
>>2182801
i'm already here on /vst/, *my* containment board you're invading with your shit normie takes
>>
>>2178981
Are you the artstyle schizo from the master of command thread?
>>
>>2182906
no, I'm just simply pointing out game designers are lazy with their copycat building design. You are melting down with words words words
>>
>>2179620
>If you actually want an answer, because Majesty runs at 24 fps in 800x600 resolution. Lessaria is basically better in every way.
>what is Majesty Gold HD
also, the game feels soulless, looks like shit, has less features than the first game, and has shitty reddit tier quips instead of original memorable quotes
>>
>>2184275
no, youre just having a melty
>>
So how is it?
I love Majesty 2 btw.
>>
>>2184505
it's alright. a 7/10 game. majesty nostalgiafags are are terribly entitled and insufferable
>>
>>2184505
more or less the same, only worth playing if you have issues running majesty 2
>>2184551
>>2184451
>nooo why don't you buy these worse versions of a game you like!
>>
>>2179018
What other ones are there? The only one I know is Majesty.
>>
>>2184505

It's OK. Janky and buggy but the dev team actually admitted they fucked up and has been throwing out patches daily. There's not nearly as much content as in Majesty 1/2 so let's hope they'll add some stuff, they already promised free DLC.
>>
>>2178991
Who is going to sue them tho?
>>
>>2184505
It's okay. Played like six missions and they feel very samey. Heroes are too altruistic, so you don't really need to pay to motivate them like in Majesty. The mission variety is SEVERELY lacking, but the aesthetics are fine. It leans more in the Warcraft III designs than I might like, but it looks solid. Overall, not worth the pricetag, but might be with some work.
>>
>no building animations (not a big deal)
>tiny ass area where you're allowed to build
>ONE skirmish map with no customization options
>no sandbox
>no death lines
>no mausoleum
I like that every building can be upgraded, every hero having ability unlocks, hero appearance changing after buying equipment, and of course the classic advisor. I hope they keep updating it especially with options to disable their balance obsessed changes.
>>
>>2184644
I can only find https://store.steampowered.com/app/1697870/Crown_of_Greed/
>>
>>2184597
Majesty sisters why are we so entitled
>>
>>2185034
>balance obsessed changes
They should focus on making each mission unique. Locking heroes or forcing you to do things for arbitrary reasons would make the game more fun and force players to find alternate ways to win.
>>
>>2185131
there's also heroes of orn (rough around the edges solo dev game) and stellar outpost commander (sci fi rts with majesty similarities)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.