>>2293823
Can't wait for GW to strike them all down, 40k isn't Fantasy, its actually sells

>>2293825
Kek, funny if happens (it wouldn't be the first time).

They will never do anything interesting with it, if they use the modern 40k lore. And the game will be a failure mechanically.

>>2293854
>They will never do anything interesting with it, if they use the modern 40k lore.
What should they use to make it interesting?

>will be a failure mechanically.
What mechanics would you use, change or improve to make it a good fun strategy game of massive battles?

>>2294075
>What should they use to make it interesting?
Razor focused single planet and a well known conflict. Does justice to few initial but well done factions and opens the door for more by dlc, which is their main priority anyway.

>>2293823
please enough with the fucking IP slop.

>>2294098
>Does justice to few initial but well done factions
They already fail in that, SM and Astra Militarum appear as separate factions instead being both part of the Imperium faction.
Just like in the failed Gladius, the Civilization-like.

>>2294098
This sounds fucking shit, why does this board always have the worst takes? One of the few interesting things about 40k is its scope. A galaxy worth of worlds and factions is more fun. Encouraging DLC is extremely jewish.

>>2297327
>A galaxy worth of worlds and factions is more fun.
Agree, but those factions should be from ACTUAL different factions, not from the same one. SM and AM should be one: Thy Imperium.

>>2294161
>history isn’t an IP

>>2295990
Literally every single 40k game does this outside of campaigns. Idk if you know this, but you can fight two imperial forces against each other on the table top. And there are PLENTY of examples in the lore of such things happening.

>>2293825
The account that responded to the guy is the official GW Warhammer account. Literally GW saying they are ok with modding.

>>2307442
Why the change?