I liked the first Spellforce, it was cool.

>>2383636
idk about this reforced thing but iirc the original spellforce 3 had
>a decent plot
>decent rpg mechanics
>very good looking maps
>horrendous, absolutely painful rts segments
haven't hated phoned in rts segments this much since dragon commander. i don't think i finished it and i feel slightly bad about it. if you finish it, more power to you.

>>2383636
played all three recently (base spellforce 3 and its expansions, those 3) decent overall story, characters, designs and worldbuilding, the problem is that the rts sections are quite mediocre, would have been better if it was an actual crpg honestly

>>2383706
>idk about this reforced thing
just updates the mechanics a bit, so it's on par with the dlcs, largely the same tho

>>2383706
>>2383785
>rts
What in particular did you dislike about that?
My only real complaint is that unit control (or rather - units themselves) is somewhat unresponsive. To put it plainly, it had an annoying delay when clicking shit and when you move command or attack move, it's a bit of a gable in how the unit will execute the said command which was annoying
Other than that, nothing else seemed as particularly negative. Just your standard stuff.

>>2383984
i didn't like the unresponsiveness like you said, also the pace. everything gets built too quickly (both buildings and units) and it ends up feeling like part .io clicker blobber game where you take as much of the map as you can in a matter of minutes because resources aren't really an issue that slows you down from what i recall. and then part moba where your guys engage in a constant tug of war with an endless stream of mooks from both sides, slowly but inevitably progressing towards the enemy bases because your heroes are just too good to be stopped

>>2384130
I see where you are coming from. Pretty valid.

>>2383674
the second was shit