[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/vt/ - Virtual YouTubers


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: brave_SCIqfEsSGZ.jpg (61 KB, 749x271)
61 KB
61 KB JPG
You just know Kiara must loathe Irys so much after yesterday's incident.
>>
>>110192857
Weird bait. IRyS didn't type a few words into a prompt to get a plagiarized image and then claim she spent hours drawing it
>>
>LLM is the same as Gen AI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPX6piYTNGo
Does Kiara also hate Laplus, Azki, and Koyori too? Fucking tranny
>>
>>110193075
llms are a type of generative AI
they generate text
>>
File: iu[1].jpg (6 KB, 150x150)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>Irys
>>
>>110193110
Amazing. Please continue on this path.
>>
>>110193027
yeah kiara is a sister
>>
>>110193170
Is that sarcasm? He's not wrong. LLMs are the bane of real writers just like image generators are for true artists
>>
>>110193046
Zoomers and chuds are going to "it's not that serious" themselves out of critical thinking skills and clean drinking water but sure chatgpt is fine I guess
>>
>>110193170
Nigger are you for real? They're literally same technology. AI chatbot use scraped chat data to formulate conversation the same way AI art does with digital pictures.
>>
>>110193627
Then why don't the twitter trannies harass Kiara over it, or the JPs who did that stream? Why just IRyS?
>>
>>110193727
your government will spend your tax dollars on it anyway
>>
>>110193837
Nobody considers coveraations art.
>>
>>110193875
I don't know, go to twitter and ask them, don't bother us here.
>>
>>110193837
You're not going to win the AI war if you go after AI coding and search engine (basically what LLM does, it's not different than you googling it yourself). Stick with the genAI art shit that actually hurts artists and make for good PR for your cause. If you go against useful usage of AI, you WILL lose. Just warning you cause I hate genAI too, but don't make me hate Anti-AI faggots more.
>>
>>110193727
Noo dude bro it ain't that deep fr fr no cap. Check out this AI generated fortnite movie trailer starring jack black I made. You just hate progress, bro.
>>
>>110192857
>>110193027
samefag
gay
retarded
etc
>>
>>110193875
Because Kiara has taken a vocal anti-AI stance even though she uses it herself. She's just a hypocrite and most people don't realize it, just like how she's still friends with Elira and Enna despite being "anti-bullying".
>>
this has to be the most forced """yab""" so far this year. this is the best that phasefags can do?
>>
>>110193943
>it's not different than you googling it yourself
Except it is? AI completely hallucinates things and mashes completely unrelated information together because it just scours webpages for key words and doesn't actually understand context. When I google something myself I can check my sources and see for myself whether or not something is BS.
>>
>>110194238
If it's so fucking bad, why do you care then? Clearly the market will sort itself out if AI LLMs are so shit, and clearly your jobs (a working tranny.... now I'm the one hallucinating) won't be at risk, RIGHT?
>>
>>110194375
Because retards like you don't realize how bad it i and take everything it says as gospel. It's bad because it encourages intellectual laziness instead of even the most bare minimum of critical thinking skills. I don't even work in tech, you retard "vibe coder" AIjeet.
>>
>>110192857
>Nijinigger: HOW DO I MAKE THIS ABOUT KIARA?!
Watch as kiaraschizo bumps this to 300 posts and fills it with dox
>>
>use chatgpt once
>retards have a meltdown
huh?
>>
>>110194200
Wow, your entire post is full of bullshit
>>
>>110194542
Justice brought in an undesirable audience
>>
>>110194607
>least obvious falseflag
>>
File: 1773331800848077.jpg (45 KB, 590x394)
45 KB
45 KB JPG
>>110194462
can't forget this one
>>
>>110192857
>does collab with neuro
>suddenly hates ai
I'm noticing, didn't realize she lost the vedal bowl.
>>
File: hq720.jpg (87 KB, 686x386)
87 KB
87 KB JPG
>>110194574
>I don't want to believe it, therefore it must not be true!
>>
>>110194238
What's that thing where if you know a lot about something it's easy to tell when someone is full of shit on that topic but if you're an idiot you just trust whatever someone says? AI is just that times 1000
>>
>>110194884
The Dunning-Kruger effect, get ready for a whole lot more of that in the next few decades as even the retards ITT keep arguing "Bro why don't you just trust whatever the AI says it's so much easier than googling things yourself bro"
>>
>>110194726
omg a meme? Do you need a safespace snowflake?
>>
>>110194935
Funny coming from the people who take CNN as gospel.
>>
The market adopts shitty or destructive tools all the time... "tragedy of the commons" is the most... well, common way it happens.

>A working tranny
Lmfao
>>
>>110194935
I'm a "tech bro" and we're starting to get a lot of training that says the opposite of this. Don't trust AI, don't take it at face value, think for yourself, etc

Still, I can make dozens of images of Kiara's fat butt whenever I want and that makes AI worth it.
>>
>>110194880
You're a nijinigger. Why should I believe a word you say?
>>
>>110194770
Fuck off with your homoleech
>>
>>110194238
Ai hallucinations don't nearly occur as much as they used to though.
>>
>>110195295
Retard YOU'RE the one who literally refusing to listen to Kiara's own fucking words coming out of her own mouth. Is Kiara a nijinigger then?
>>
>>110194994
I don't even watch CNN. Why have rightoids made it out to be some sort of scary ultra leftist equivalent to fox news? Nobody watches that shit.
>>
>>110195578
Pls don't call Kiwawa slurs
>>
>>110196756
they're all mouthpieces of israel these days. no one under the age of 50 takes legacy media seriously anymore
>>
>>110194949
Surely a meme about killing her didn't end fueling the retard anti-AI hate mob. Also that account was RTing a bunch of abusive tweets towards Irys
>>
Not as much as your parents loathe you, op
>>
>>110192857
Kiara hates anyone who takes attention away from her
>>
>>110192857
brainlets who rely on chatbots aren’t even in the same league as the ones permanently polluting image search for everyone with digital trash
>>
Oh no, IRyS chatted to ChatGPT. How scandalous.
You dramawhores must be SO starved to cling to a complete nothingburger this hard.
>>
>>110193075
And Shiori, and Ririrka. Probably half of hololive has an ai boyfriend at this point.
>>
>>110194949
>'joke' about killing IRyS
>Several tweets being an anti
>Someone points it out
>Privated the account
rumao, fucking coward
>>
Anons forgot one simple rule of the Universe...
Kiara keeps getting away with it
>>
>>110193875
Becauset twittards are, well, retarded. Many of the anti-AItards don't even know that chatGPT or characterAI or countless AI chatbots companies use nowadays use similar LLM models as their hated genAI arts.
>>
>>110192857
Since op and anti ai people are retarded, there's a difference between trying to troll a chat ai then feeling bad, and genning an image,claiming its your own work, then trying to sell it for money on your paetron.

I think you can figure out what that difference is if you decide to be smart for a second.
>>
>>110192857
she hates art generation, she's fine using it for text generation

https://x.com/takanashikiara/status/1875399421418205339
https://x.com/takanashikiara/status/1978590862159298652
>>
>>110192857
Women hating AI as usual. Same as the other thread.
>>
>>110192857
lol
>>
>>110202739
That boyfriend? Me.
>>
>>110204796
Isn't writing also an art form or did her woman brain not think that far? Rather I would assume the plagiarism is way more apparent in text based stuff than image generation AI models
>>
>>110207597
Most people don't think of them as the same because most things people write don't take much effort or aren't original thoughts that were hard to come by.
I wouldn't give two shits if someone copy pasted any of the shit I've written and passed it off as their own thoughts, but I imagine most artists would get pissy if you traced their work without crediting them.
That is the fundamental difference and most people understand that, which is why barely anyone gives a fuck about chatGPT (at least not for plagiarism reasons).
>>
>>110207854
Let's say you write an academic paper that takes actual effort to make and get through the review process. It can easily take half a year to make something like that unlike a picture that you can draw in a day or two.
Your example sounded more like if I complained that some AI model using a stick figure I drew in 10 seconds to train its dataset
>>
>>110192857
Doesn't she use chat gpt too?
>>
>>110207980
Probably yes in addition to face filters
>>
>>110207941
Well, 1) AI is using the stick figures for text training...that is probably the vast majority of the material it's trained on. Do you think something like Neuro was trained on academic papers? And 2) you're acting like people who write academic papers don't do it with the express knowledge that people are going to copy their research for their own purposes. That's basically the reason it's published.
>>
>>110208153
But can't you then argue that the artists who are drawing pictures don't do it with the knowledge that people are going to save the images and use them for their own purposes, after all they are releasing the pictures to the public most of the time when the drawings are not paywalled.
To reiterate, I don't really care one way or the other if AIs are trained on the works of other people, more power to them desu. But it's pretty weird how there seems to be a double standard for drawings compared to text/audio
>>
>>110208246
>But can't you then argue that the artists who are drawing pictures don't do it with the knowledge that people are going to save the images and use them for their own purposes
Yeah, they do, but doing the equivalent of tracing to produce new art work is probably not what most artists think is going to happen.
That is actually the purpose of most published academic work though - to be built upon. Research isn't meant to be admired as art.
And that's also why if you were to exclude academic research from an AI's training, it probably wouldn't make a difference because it probably gets referenced so much elsewhere that it doesn't matter - because that's how written information is used.
Personally I don't give a shit about AI art either (on a moral level at least - I think most AI art is shit because of how error-prone it is but that's a different issue), but there's pretty obvious differences between AI art and LLMs, even if the way they learn is the same.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.