More on threadhttps://x.com/ObviousRises/status/2050159556249141671Mimi's tweet caused people to be suspicious of the validity of it.
>>111532062
>>111532072Idk man, I can 100% see Mimi and this woman getting mass reported to the point some bureaucrat thought it'd look like an easy win for their belt. Also it's a redditor so its hard to fully trust him.There is indeed something that just doesn't fit in both cases though
>Yooukayhttps://old.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1t0wh3a/ive_been_asked_to_atend_a_voluntary_interview_at/
>>111532161There was a sharty thread about her some months ago, I guess they genuinely reported her ass in their foodcord
>>111532072>no we would never waste public resources on something stupid>im a fed I would knowYou’re a retarded fed if you think your large, government funded organization is not slush funding retarded shit
>>111532535Jesus Christ, people aren't kidding with the loicense memes>>111532691What's sharty? KF?
>>111532971Nah, it that site that post soijak all the time, the one that gloated when they "dox" pippa when everything about her is fucking easy to find.
>>111532072Ah yes when Specific_Goat864 says he works "for a major UK police Force" and then vagueposts based on literally nothing, I believe him. Just like the kid at school whose uncle worked at Nintendo.
>>111532072>we do not actively seek out offenders for Prohibited content except in the most extreme or egregious of cases
>>111532072This FED should kill himself
>>111532771That's actually true. Only there is CSAM involved in the case the police don't use that amount of man power.
It's weird to me that the vtuber is under investigation but seemingly has access to all her accounts. Is there any way to verify if this arrest is legit?
>>111532062Let's be honest, the UK hasn't been a real country since WW2. It's been a joke that everyone's been in on but pretends they aren't since then.
>>111532072go back
>>111532072>Source: trust me bro>1000 upvotesGod I hate reddit.
>>111534133It isn't. She made it up, plenty of people out there already noticed too many nonsensical things about her story.
>>111532062>>111532072I trust random reddit comments less than I do random posts from anons /here/, but I'm almost certain she just made it up for some insane reason. At no point is it realistic for them to impose bail conditions on her to open a new account under her real name. Stop her accessing social media altogether? Absolutely, I've seen that happen before - but even for this shithole it makes zero sense for the police / the CPS to make her dox herself and in fact it actively goes against what police normally do.>>111532971>>111533015Wasn't sharty apparently.
>>111537096afaik if you are put on the sex offender list in the UK you arent allowed to use a pseudonym online.
>>111537568But she claims to be under investigation not that she got charged and convicted.
>>111537568Like the other anon said, but also if you read closely what you posted even if she had been convicted it doesn't stop sex offenders from using pseudonyms online, just that they have to inform the authorities of any pseudonyms they're using.
>>111532072>>111533397>we do not actively seek outThe thing is, that’s probably true. They’re not browsing nhentai for people commenting under doujins and trying to find the UK based ones. But the problem is these are basically only incidental laws, and it’s why banning depictions of legal acts like strangulation are so concerning. Someone could’ve downloaded a video years ago, and overnight become a sex offender. Are the police looking for this? No. Now if you get into an argument with your neighbour and write something nasty on Facebook, and they seize your devices (as they can) they will find it and they will use it against you. This is fundamentally the problem, whether is actively enforced or not, it shouldn’t even be an option for them. It’s immensely disappointing the state my country is in.
>>111537756it might be the terms she agreed to, to prevent an actual conviction.
I’m not saying the story is false, but in this hobby I’ve seen people pretend to die and then come back just to get a few minutes of attention. I don’t think I can take anyone’s word for it without some tangible proof
This is why I am moving to Japan
>arrested, let out on bail, and under investigationReasonable, likely reported by someone over the content she posted and commissioned>forced to make a new account with a real nameVery strange bordering on fake, unless she was outright begging for bail conditions to allow social media access with heavy restrictions >allowed access to the old account and post on itUnbelievable, and quite strange why she would really want to talk about it, or even go ahead with wanting to keep posting if it meant doxxing herself
>>111538274But anon think of the poor chuubas suffering from cancer every two months on all their different alt accounts.
It's funny how many people think this must be a joke, when it's the norm in the UK
>>111540141Anon you're making the mistake a lot are in that you think being arrested for loli shit is the outlandish thing people are pointing out - it's not. It's her bail conditions which simply do not happen.
Thank God I live in the US and not a third world country
>>111540331If you are arrested for loli as a UK citizen, you can expect the police will demand completely transparency on your online activity from that point on. You will be permitted to live but only on their leash. If it sounds illogical, that's because our parliament is primarily women, who all govern emotionally and without logicBelieve it or not, most western governments want complete online transparency for ALL citizens, regardless of how criminal they are. So of course if they have an excuse to do it to one citizen at their mercy, they will
>>111540416Then why has this never been used as a conditon of pre-charge bail before she made it up?
I still think this is a grift. It just doesn't smell legit, I think she's 100% depending on people being ignorant and believing the police state memes.
>>111540480You've never heard of pedos having to knock on neighbourhood doors to say they are pedos because they are legally required to? This girls career is online, so they permitted it to continue.I admit I don't know for sure if she's lying or not, but I don't agree with people saying it's not feasible.
>>111540591>believing the police state memes.sorry but those are real.
>>111540480How do you know it never has? Do you have an encyclopedic knowledge of every UK court case for this kind of "crime"?
I feel like theres people who WANT it to be true just to justify their own views
>>111540620Those are only real for things relating to migrants, troons or the religion of blowing themselves up because people report them, so she is either lying about something, its not real, or they got spam reported about her and found something else beyond the beastiality art she commissioned of herself
>>111532535> voluntary interview>Get arrested if you don want to go???
the more I read about this, the more fake it sounds, it just seems too retarded to be true and yet everyone's just falling for it
>>111540416>>111540620Once again you're ignoring or deliberately ignoring the point. Even in her own claims she's only out on bail. The state doesn't NEED her to to create a new account under her IRL name to keep tabs on her. Yes the UK is a totalitarian shithole - but even under these conditions it makes zero sense.>>111540665There absolutely are. It's a mix of two groups of people>those who think anyone who's calling it bullshit are somehow defending the UKIt's happened in this thread, it's happened in multiple threads. Despite anons on both sides agreeing the current state of Britian is awful one side is ignoring the fact what she's claimed just doesn't make sense in regards to the new account.>kiwifags and shartyfagsThey desperately want it to be true because they want to celebrate a vtuber getting fucked over, and best of all for them it's a loli vtuber. The sad likely reality is that it's just some menhera attention whore isn't as enjoyable for them.
>>111537568>>111538198But that doesn't even fit, since her new X account was the exact same, it was just mimiyabaii with two i at the end (at first? I think she changed it again and probably because she figured out it didn't fit what was written in the law, which she wouldn't have made such a mistake in the first place if her livelihood was on the line), and that would still contradict the terms here and that's only if she was considered a sex offender; which afaik isn't the case here because it's a different crime (tho who knows with the UK I guess)I'm really not buying it, just more and more inconsistencies are popping up, and even if it was true, who cares, the UK is lost and there's nothing anyone can do about it except ignore the shithole while it turns into muslim jerusalem
>>111537096It was definitely sharty.Leave it to "le based kf and sharty" to not be able to differentiate fiction and reality, either by unironic retardation, or by sheer malicious spite.
>>111540967>afaik isn't the case here because it's a different crime (tho who knows with the UK I guess)She would be considered a sex offender if found guilty, but according to her she's not even been formally charged yet - just out on police bail. So yeah there's just too much that doesn't make sense.
>>111540993Seems odd they'd deny it rather than claim it as a win then. Also odd that they went after some literal who rather than someone like Shondo who's already on the radar of kiwi farms and presumably sharty and far, far bigger.
>>111540932I get it, you're not debating whether or not it happened, you're saying there's no way it could happen.Well I disagree. Consider that it's a very unique case. Imagine you're from two generations above yours and you apprehend a pedo who makes money from an audience of pedos online. How do you diffuse this situation while still allowing her to make a living? Try thinking like an out of touch boomer. "Hm. Well okay you can still keep your strange entertainment career going, but the pedo stuff has to stop, so why don't you just continue what you do but make it a fresh start, stepping away from your pedo audience and being more truthful? Use your real name, no more secret pedo cult stuff!"
>>111541106The more I hear the more it sounds like a grift, if she'd said it was for questioning muslims or saying something about golders green I'd have been more likely to believe but it just sounds more and more retarded they would allow her any kind of internet access at all if she was being investigated for cp
>>111541151Because A it wasn't as severe as CP, it was drawn lolicon, and B that's her primary income
>>111541106>allow her to make a living>exactly how she was 'being a pedo'you're retarded, and not in the 'boomer' sort of way>oh no we got this pedo ringleader that was selling little girls, but we can't just take his means of making money so huhhh we still allow him to sell things, just not little girls!!what the fuck is going on in your head lmao
>>111540665Normalfags have been on a antiloli witch hunt for a few months now, all of their attempts bit them in the ass so far so they are definitely eager to jump on this case.
>>111541172>it wasn't CPthey don't give a fuck buddy, stop the grift
>>111541172Sounds like cope from people that want to believe uk government matches the propaganda. Honestly comments like yours just make me belive her story even less, the police have zero issue making people unemployed and absolutely would never let her continue something they think was nonce related as a job.
>>111541186I'm thinking more the YouTube grifters who use anime avatars to be mad about things. I mean they are occasionally reasonably mad about something, but plenty of the time it's flimsy as fuck.
>>111541182Now you're being irrational and inflammatoryStop and think for a momentBeing an online entertainer does not mean being a pedo ringleaderPedos use oxygen, that doesn't mean they are banned from oxygen if they are caught. If you are under investigation, you aren't forbidden from continuing your work, because that would be a breach of human rights.>>111541194See, apparently I'm the one making out the UK police to be evil, yet I have to defend them here. No, they don't treat all pedo cases the same. Evil if you have real CP, most pedos are simply put on the sex offender registry and forced to attend rehabilitation classes. And you can bet they went very easy on a young girl.>>111541220I'm not saying you have to believe her story, I'm saying how it's feasible. The people saying this could never happen are wrong, that doesn't mean this isn't a grift. Police follow a law, they're not doing things out of spite. They don't take your career away unless they are putting you in prison. And her career is not what she is being arrested for, it was for the lolicon drawings.
>>111532848As long as you pretend a problem doesn’t exist no one will blame you for it.
>>111541268Those are just the usual vultures flocking at any form of drama to make a quick buck. But there is a distinct group of people that gets a hard on for cases like this to justify their inability for separating real life from fiction.
>>111541106Even as a convicted sex offender on the register you can still use pseudonyms on online accounts - you just have to inform them of the names and give them access when requested. She's not even been convicted yet she's out on bail - you genuinely don't seem to understand the UK criminal justice system. The Supreme Court has upheld the right of people who are under investigation to remain anonymous beyond details such as gender, age, and general location. There is no police force that is going to force someone who hasn't even been charged to make an account under their real name (and certainly the CPS isn't). At a stretch I can see them breaching that if she were some political commentator (and even that's a stretch at the investigation stage) but not for this. The totalitarianism in the UK is about thought policing the population about societal and political issues like immigration, when it comes to any other crime they genuinely barely care. Without doxing myself (and you can choose to believe me or not) I can categorically state that in most police forces so much allocation (financial, staffing, work hours) has been put into public order offences (mean tweets and facebook posts) that they're really struggling with nearly everything else.>>111541172>>111541194This brings up another point, because this kind of shit is the second lowest grade of CP under the legislation - and in every case I've ever read that happened in the UK that involves similar material it was only ever an added charge after they'd already been altered to and found actual CP and happened across the loli/shota shit.
>>111541381>police do not act out of spiteThey absolutely fucking do, especially the dei diversity hires. There's a whole genre of videos on youtube with pigs getting caught out on camera.This whole story is not believable and you seem like you're trying to find excuses for the grift.
>>111541416>altered toalerted to*
>>111532072Right like when they pulled a teenager out of her house because of her "racist" memes
By the way it seems she deleted the new account?
>>111541476Yes, I explained in this post >>111541416that's were all the actual policing is focused on at this point in many, many forces around the country - the ones investigating actual crime are underfunded and understaffed.
>>111541381>Pedos use oxygen, that doesn't mean they are banned from oxygen if they are caught.Bad analogy, change oxygen to children and you'll see it. In this case she supposedly distributed "CP" on the internet, do you not find it strange the during an active investigation the police would just let her do as she pleases as long as she pinky promises to not post "CP" again?
>>111541503Would that break her bail?
>>111541503yeah she most likely realized that people weren't going to buy the grift, she'll probably stay in slow mode for a few weeks and then go damage control and try to act as if nothing happened in a month or two
>>111541600She wouldn't need to promise anything if she is being directly monitored and using her real name
>>111532062they stole all her shit!
Bongs should worry about real crimes before going after made up ones
>>111542370whoa there, calm down with the racism.
>>111541503Yeah cause she made it the fuck up.
>>111541913Why do people post pictures of text with nothing more than a white background and black font? Since you posted it, can you let me know?
>>111542370why are you xenophobic?
>>111542370You have been reported for this anti-islamic statement
>>111532072Ah yes, the random anon claiming on the internet that the government is always right and just and there simply must be more to these cases (totally secret of course but just trust him). I'm sure this guy is on the up-and-up
>>111538114It doesn't have to be a neighbor, just reports from a handful of strangers on the internet and you're on the police radar, and these people are usually subject to organized report campaigns. The fact that law enforcement is drowning in CSE cases is secondary to the fact that they're going to handle low-hanging fruit that's easy to prosecute and are unlikely to experience meaningful community push back, especially when they can make an example of something so far at the margins like chibi or loli art, they hope it will deter people from doing the real things but these people live in different worlds that don't really overlap.
>going after thought crimes while they commit real crimesa tale as old as time
4chan and rule34 communities declared war to the united kingdom thinking there would be no consequences? kek.
This is going to get a lot worse as the precedent is now set and antis will start reporting every UK streamer they dislike. What a wonderful country. Why are victimless crimes even a thing? What are the arguments for it?
>>111543436Based UK.
>>111543469We get it, you're a super cool contrarian. Pat yourself on the back for how cool you are.
>>111543436They already do that shit to youtubers, it's not like its a new thing, usually its about politics though
>>111543469>Based UK.The same uk trying to shut down the site you are posting on.
>>111543436This sound pretty hard for Vedal, extra hate for him for literally using AI
https://x.com/TheTopTierGoon/status/2050596727766344079Allegedly her actual bond
>>111532062Idk, I'm still suspicious of this being a publicity stunt until I see public records of the arrest. Tha bail bond form couldn've just been printed out.
>>111543753Ask a few AIs to create a fake UK bail bond and see if one of them turns out like the one she posted, pretty easy to figure out IMO
>>111543711>Allegedly her actual bondOk how the fuck did she get caughtSomeone must have snitched herI don't believe anything else
>>111543711Those aren't the bail conditions she said on twitter so she did lie
>>111543802it's completely bullshit because she's not in the UK in the first place, nor would anyone be able to figure it out since she was using a european vpn to even access twitter>>111543848>actually reading itwhat the fuck are you doing, listen to her story you faggot
>>111543800You don't even need AI for this. These forms are literally online for the public
>>111543865>she's not in the UK in the first place, nor would anyone be able to figure it out since she was using a european vpn to even access twitterReally? Proof?
>>111543865>she's not in the UK in the first placeI think it's bullshit too but why do you think this?
>>111543711So she did indeed lie about one of the bail conditions being she had to self-dox. Which then begs the question - why lie and why self-dox?
I thought they confiscated her phone? How is she even sharing this? Doesn't thisnalso break her bail conditions as she apparently made a new discord not under hew own name?
>>111542702Right, instead the random reddit and twitter claim are the one that are 20p% true
>>111544244No, if devices are seized you can get new ones. You're not restricted from Internet capable devices entirely.
>>111544244No if you read the supposed bail form she's given to someone else to post, the bail conditions don't mention anything about having to make new accounts in her own name so that was in fact bullshit, just like a lot of anons were saying.
>>111544391there's more pages, how do we not know it's on another page? they didn't share them all
If this is a grift, it is an insanely risky grift.I do believe Shitain is such a fucked place they could do this, but all the info isn't lining up.
>>111544509Because the bail conditions are listed on page 1 and 2 of the 16, the first and final image
>>111544509The bail conditions section is all visible. From reading it she seems to have shared these images with others, possible someone underage
>>111544585>she seems to have shared these images with others, possible someone underageIf true then this is a hilarious pity campaign and grift.World of difference between "she was just drawing it" and "she also showed this art to a minor"
>>111544391that's what this isno holding any profile/account that is not in her legal name, or otherwise agreed by the officer of the case.
>>111544685Her new discord is under mimi yabai so apparently either they are fine with her using that or she's breaking her bail conditions
>>111544096>>111544103because the UK is not in europe anymore, and her second twitter account also had an 'europe' place of origin, which obviously wouldn't be possible if she was under investigation and banned from using a VPN in the first place (which would be obfuscation of her internet footprint) more and more bullshit not lining up
This is just a politic bullshit campaign to make a country to look bad and every single one of you are literally simping for a liar, no wonder they choose a Vtuber to spread these lies about UK, they know the vtuber community full of simp would believe any lie coming from a "women"
>>111544741that would mean they approved it, yes. it's possible to not be her, but i don't see why they wouldn't approve a username as long as they continue to monitor her online activity thoroughly.
>>111544828I mean the united kingdom IS a dystopian shithole but that doesn't mean I believe this bitch.
>>111544828>This is just a politic bullshit campaign to make a country to look badThere is no need for that with the uk, The only reason anyone thinks this might be true is the fact the uk is a joke of a country. The the planetary village idiot.
>>111544769>UK is not in europe anymoreAnon the islands that make up the UK weren't physically towed away from the continent - it's not part of the EU anymore it's still Europe. And you can change whether it displays country or region/continent. Pic related.
>>111544828>make a country to look badI live here, it is bad>every single one of you are literally simping for a liarThis thread is full of anons saying they don't believe her. The entire thread is basically multiple arguments about whether it's true or not. Read the thread you dumb faggot.
https://x.com/TheTopTierGoon/status/2050596727766344079
>>111540591It is. She's a predebut vtweeter and the story has too many holes in it. She's definitely doing this for a massive attention boost and it worked.
>>111544828she lives in a third world country. why are you shocked that a third world country would act like a third world country?
>>111544966>liking chibi's posts>following chibiKill yourself
>>111544966>chibi
>>111544997I didn't link his post you fucking retard.
>>111544997boruto is fucking trash bro
>>111543711Honestly I'm cynical enough to feel they would fake this for even more "credibility"Pretty sure sharing documents like this would have gotten her into even more trouble if real.
Ok let's all unretard for a second.Let's say all of this is REAL and she's being investigated for what she commissionedHow did they find her? Did peeps mass report directly to authorities?
>>111544966It's already been posted in this thread, and without the retweet by fucking chibi of all people.But to the larger point I don't know why people are surprised about this. It's not particularly new legislation, and it's not only the UK that considers it CP. Canada, France, Australia some US states like Texas, I'm sure there are many more. It's retarded and the UK is awful but this specific issue isn't unique to the UK.
>>111545103It's time to fight, no more monitoring.
>>111545087bongs went to her house because she didn't have a drawing license and saw her stash
>>111545087Could've been anything from enough spammed reports to mom walked in at the wrong time, anyone's guess
>>111545124Yer mam wouldn't report you to the cops, she'd probably take your computer away or something. But no way she'd call the fuzz on you.
>>111545087Some say it was sharty that mass reported her but I don't believe that because>there's a screenshot of them denying it and if it was them they'd be celebrating it not denying it>why go after a literal who rather than someone like shondoThe most likely thing, if it is real, is she shared the images with someone directly that she new IRL for some fucking unknown reason, or like an anon in one of the other threads (also from the UK who was caught with loli shit) she did something stupid like torrenting and then accidentally seeding images without a VPN or anything.
>>111545103>It's not particularly new legislation, and it's not only the UK that considers it CP.In some places it's illegal because they think drawings (AND I SAY DRAWINGS, NOT 3D ANIMATIONS WITH REALISTIC MODELS) material for real pedos to fap (protection of development of minors in general or some shit).Denmark wanted to jail a person like 10 years ago for lolis too, but what did they do? They went to ask for psychologists and other professionals to study and actually find if drawings actually correlate to real shit and guess what, after some months the most important sexologists of the country came out and scientifically proved that there's no correlation.So denmark supreme court followed science, legalized drawings and Person didn't go to jail
>>111544836If they approved that then she wasn't required to doxx herself, meaning she lied.
>>111545083Yeah it is.
>>111532062>offtopic, doxx and a reddit screencap thread well done
>>111544987It's either a grift, or she got caught with real cp or was arrested for something else. Even those posted documents don't day what she was being acused of or investigated for
What if it's something hilariously turbo retarded like she submitted actual CP to an artist for a commission as reference.
Oh boy, here come the grift!!!!https://x.com/dumbfrenchrat/status/2050607740842582431
>>111545407>Oh boy, here come the griftIf someone reported to the authorities It might have happened tho unironically About the deleting posts part
>>111545347Saying they arrested you for drawings is a lot better for your case than saying they caught you with other stuff and the art is just added on
>>111532072I.e. "We busy planting more evidence, m8."
>>111545407Still think this Mimi character is full of shit but this one I can completely believe.
>>111545407This seems entirely plausible, EU does do that kind of thing all the time.
>>111545407If you say something that violates twitter's TOS they might report it to the police I guess?
>>111545087>>111545392I think this is the most likely if it is real, that she had actual CP and she's lying about it just being the drawings. And even then whenever I read about nonces getting caught for it it's usually always because they were sharing it in some group chat.
gamers rise up
>>111545601If it was for her art commissions alone it would make her the first case of it, every other one has had real cp
>>111545087The UK has been passing all this cybersurveillance specifically to do bullshit like this, its probably not hard to catch someone
>>111545223i don't see it that way because what she said is the first line in the clause. the second line isn't definitive. she shouldn't have to specify that MAYBE they'll let her keep using her username. it says clearly that she has to use her name on stuff, that's not a lie. i think it's fair to assume they weren't going to approve anything less, which is probably why she "lied"
>>111545718There was an anon in another thread from the UK who said similar happened to him over just loli (mentioned it here >>111545194but that was a torrent honeytrap apparently. And in good news for Mimi (if this is real and it's only loli she has) the police eventually decided to take no further action (he never got his devices back though).
>>111545760It says she can use her real name, or a name that's approved by police, not that she has to doxx herself. It also says that she is required to inform them of any new social media accounts so they would know about what name she was using. Her now deleted twitter was also not in her real name on the actual account name it was mimi_yabaii which was just her original with an extra i. There are too many holes in her story, she is either grifting or hiding something, probably that it was real cp.
>>111545087>How did they find her?She's a vtuber it's possible someone in the police or government saw her on the youtube algo or saw his/her kid watching her and took offense and sent off to legal to have her found.
>>111545718>>111545821It was this anon>>111506659>>111506701
I've heard rumors it's a tranny.If it's a tranny then I think he had real CP.
>>111545857>she was a vtuberNo she was a vtweeter, she never never streamed or made videos, her entire online presence was commisioning art of her character.
>>111545883So they downloaded a spiked torrent, and uploaded it, so they nabbed them for distribution?Kinda BS, I wonder what kind of material it was for someone to be tracking it.
>>111545601>I think this is the most likely if it is real, that she had actual CP and she's lying about it just being the drawingsWe could "easily" check this by seeing if she recently (months ago) got banned on social medias. Thats how generally they find and raid for real things.Thought that makes me thing; wouldn't having actual cp result in her being literally blocked from using the internet ever again? There's a lot of things that don't mak sense
>>111545892I've seen this said a few times too and yeah that'd track but other than it being a vtweeter I can't see anyone providing any actual evidence for it.
>>111545973Law enforcement agencies have a list of hashes for marked illegal material for one reason or another. They're probably all monitoring anyone seen distributing it
>>111546044She hasn't actually been convicted of anything yet, but that would likely be the outcome if she was.
>>111546044She's been released on police bail which means it's not even gone to court yet and police bail tends to be somewhat less restrictive than bail she'd get once it goes to magistrates court. But yeah sometimes sex offenders (once they're convicted and added to the list) are banned entirely from social media and other online accounts; sometimes it's the case we're you can have them but you have to give them a list and they'll randomly check your devices.
>>111543711>EU directive 2012/2013brexit?
>>111545540>EU does do that kind of thing all the time.It doesn't even have the authority to do so, it's specific countries like Germany and France that chose to go full retard. If anything, the EU is stopping them from getting even worse like the UK
>>111546220>It doesn't even have the authority to do so, it's specific countries like Germany and France that chose to go full retard99% of the times is authorities reaching the poster and be like "okay bro we both don't want problems and we don't want to waste resources so it's best if you delete your post call it a day and we're Friends like before"This is if someone actually reports the post/comment to the Police.
>>111546156After we left the EU the EU laws weren't automatically repealed unless done so through Parliament. Quite a lot were done in one batch but some stayed, usually because the EU laws were identical or near enough to laws that existed before we joined (like this one - which is about rights in custody).
>>111532072the UK government literally wastes law enforcement and court resources on fucking mean tweets, lmao @ anything insinuating they have something better to do
>>111546362People are saying "yeah this doesn't make sense it HAS to be more than drawings because the police can't be that retarded"I still think it might be real because I know the UK police ARE that retarded. They arrested someone for having a Master Sword letter opener once.
>>111546112>She hasn't actually been convicted of anything yet, but that would likely be the outcome if she was.I'm not Brit so I don't know the law there, but if she was caught for actual real stuff this means the NCMEC got a tip and after confirming it was a real person the tip would get later sent to the UK police meaning they'd already know she was sharing illegal materialWouldn't that already mean a total block from the internet? They have the proof
>>111545211>So denmark supreme court followed science, legalized drawings and Person didn't go to jailDenmark might be the only country to withhold prosecuting someone on their laws and withholding a verdict upon testimony of actual experts that the law is bullshit.
>>111546421No, there's usually not a complete ban until conviction (or at least bail at a magistrates court which is hasn't got yet, she's only on police bail). I've no idea why.
>>111545211The Dutch Protocol was also held up for why kids should be transed immediately.
>>111546529>The Dutch ProtocolDutch is Netherlands not Denmark you burger
>>111532535removed, which means some mod/admin deleted itwhat site archives reddit?
>>111532062>Moving to the UKFound your problem.
>>111546633No idea but I can tell you what it was about because I've seen the screenshot floating around other places. Basically>guy gets a letter asking him to phone the police to schedule a voluntary interview>asks whether he has to do this as it says voluntary>people on the post explain the 'voluntary' part means you get decide date and time, but if you can't say no otherwise you'll be arrested and brought in for an interview anyway
>>111546633>RemovedAnd thankfully so, that post smelled too much like bullshit; account was created one day before the post, set to private too.He kept changing the story/didn't tell all of it, he says he's from the UK and yet he kept using the Word "LAWYER" instead of SOLICITOR in a UK subreddit.Too suspicious that this came up RIGHT after mimi's situation.That seemed even more fake than mimi's arrest
>>111546421They can't ban her entirely because she isn't yet a criminal, she has to actually be convicted in court for a total ban.
>>111543711Technically speaking, if that was her actual real name - that would potentially be contempt of court issue.By having a real name out there, it perverts the investigation because it prevents a fair trial by an unbiased jury, albeit a tiny chance of anyone on said jury ever knowing about this case.So if it is legit, either her or the person who said that account up is in trouble.Either way something still feels fishy about it.
>>111546633It says they removed because it was untrue, and going by the comments in there it was kinda sus. They don't make you go to an interview for a "non crime hate incident", they send the HR woman round your house for a "chat".
>>111546871No, although names aren't released until being charged they regularly are (unless they're kids) upon being charged. Nothing to do with the jury instead it's about the privacy of the alleged offender before actually being charged. It's completely legal for someone under investigation to go public and say so, but it's not for the police to do it or force them to.
>>111546812Some of the comments replying to him mention him being in britian to study so he's some kind of foreigner, and also that it was for a "non crime hate incident" about a jesus is a cunt tshirt
>>111547034Yea nvm i thought it was the previous post of the wife arrested because of chibis
>>111547077There's no info about that either as far as I know, and a lot of people claiming they're the same person makes me think its also sus
>>111544966>you're innocent until proven guilty but doxx yourself if you work online until we can decideIf she's not grifting and this is not a fake document that's funny, the UK is a funny place
>>111547362>or a name otherwise agreed by the officer in this case
>>111547463And if the officer does not agree on any other name?
>>111547500Then she wouldn't have been able to call her new account mimi_yabaii or her new discord mimiyanagiVT, or she would be in breach of her bail conditions and is getting detained.
>>111547575Her new account had the handle @mimi_yabaii but her full name as a username, though. Not sure about the pedocord
>>111547645Her discord account show in that goon guys images shows as Mimi Yanagi_VT, also made the day of her seizure apparently. I also don't believe they would allow her to use a handle similar to her old one but require her "real name" on it for only that, which she since deleted which also makes it more sus. There's nothing in her documents that says what she was being investigated for either.
The original account being up for any length of time throws a huge spanner in the works.That shit just doesn't happen, especially if they were accused of some illegal content.The police can make a formal request to have the given account suspended while the whole legal process happens, deleting anything would be tampering with evidence, even if they had copies.At least when it is suspended none of the followers could have access to the "offending materials". It would take minutes to mirror the entire account and get it suspended, that should have been gone 2 weeks ago or whenever it was she was picked up by the party bus, not kept around so they can tell her followers she's on a new account.Shit feels off bro.Genuinely feels like the most retarded rebrand imaginable.
>>111544966Is it possible that the vtuber typed all this out? It looks legit but maybe the vtuber is good at writing documents. Would the UK let people post their documentation?
>>111548242You can find the forms easily enough online, I imagine you can find specific templates so that you only need to fill out certain details yourself (because I doubt she's intelligent enough to do it herself if it's fake because this is an insane thing to do). But yeah there's no rule about sharing it (knew a bloke who was on bail for domestic violence and posted it so he could go through how it was bullshit).
Japanese Twitter hates the UK now lol
>>111547362>tranny sacrificed his anonymity to let every UK lolituber know about what the police is doing when he could've simply quit social mediaBased
>>111548461funny how a fabricated story for a grift made the UKs image worsen for the chronically online Japanese
>>111548564Fabricated or real, it's the fact that it is believable that makes it worse.There's high profile names bringing her up now.https://x.com/SavedAClickFGC/status/2050543553961758839This shit has gone memetic whatever it is, and it's likely going to get even more public with time.
>>111548461>>111548564This government (and general acceptance by the society) should be hated. I think if enough people point it out the general public people might actually start to realise this is not a good or normal place. When it comes from Vance and similar it's easy for people to dismiss it as usual retardation but if more and more people around the world actually force my countrymen to wake the fuck up then I don't really consider it much of a bad thing if she did make it all up (which I think she did really based on all the oddities about her specific story).
>>111548836kek, if it was made up I bet she's absolutely shitting herself now wondering how to come back from this. I imagine she might have fabricated it to get a few pity points amongst her audience and similar ones - not this level of exposure.
>>111532848both are bad, prosecute both, that's the correct answer.
I haven't made up my mind one way or the other, but I will say that it's entirely plausible for the vtuber in question to be highly retarded and fail to follow basic instructions given by the police (especially under high emotional stress).
When are they getting Shondo?
Why are labour mps running defense on 4chan? Nigga you're 6 months away from being jobless!
>>111533397Yeah dude, dont trust ai summarys. they aren't reliable in regards to legal stuff.
>>111544987What are the holes in the story?
>>111548894Because the leadership of the government are bought and sold by the Blair faction who are all in on internet control and identification. Not to mention lobbying by groups like big data. That said they have done SOME decent things, though even the tories did the occasional decent thing too. Right now I don't think anyone looks good to be honest.
>>111549455Yeah
>>111532062>>111532072>>111546812>>111547077>>111547246No, the stuff in the OP with someone wife being arrested for chibi drawings is a different incident.Mimi wasn't drawing stuff. she just comissioned art. Source: https://x.com/TheTopTierGoon/status/2050047466934874461
>>111548942If it comes out it was faked she is going to get destroyed. There is clearly one option out of this, actually get arrested.
>>111549504restore britain?
>>111549455AI summaries are full of bullshit but that one is based on real news article sources (The Times UK, The Independent) citing the same number figure
>>111549531She's a literal who vtweeter, she could just make a new account
does she stream?does she make youtube videos or something? shorts? tiktoks?what does she even do, why does anyone care
>>111549526>Mimi wasn't drawing stuff. she just comissioned art. Source: https://x.com/TheTopTierGoon/status/2050047466934874461
>>111549581No she is a vtweeter that commisioms art of herself getting fucked by dogs, that's literally it
>>111549561>The offence of malicious communication is primarily prosecuted under the Malicious Communications Act 1988. The Act makes it an offence to send a letter, electronic communication, or other article with the purpose of causing distress or anxiety to the recipient or any other person.Most of those arrests are from threats of violence made in domestic disputes and very few lead to convictions
>>111549624so... she's a vtuber that doesn't tube?what the fuck is going on, why is everyone so fucking retarded now
>>111549624>commisioms art of herselfthen someone unironically snitched
>>111549534Uh, too extreme for me brah. I just want a government that largely leaves me alone on the internet and realises fiction is fiction.
>>111549561Those are mostly facebook posts critical of muslims
>>111532062>>111532072>>111549526Source of the reddit post in the OP, that people are confusing for Mimi: https://old.reddit.com/r/LegalAdviceUK/comments/1t07ckh/my_wife_has_just_been_arrested_for_chibistyle_art/
>>111549619Maybe that guy about the CP reference was onto something.
>>111549642'she' just likes to larp as an uwu anime girl online
>>111549663Anything other than restore is a choice for more of the same, or full retard tier open borders with the greens.
>>111549619>>111549624>commissioning art of yourself getting fucked by animals using a loli modelThere's a major missing piece here that led to both her getting reported and them finding something worth pursuing legal action
>>111549642People get their character PNG artwork commissioned then scoff at the cost of the actual rigging for a model when they could be posting on twitter.
>>111549685>>111549722What do you mean?
>>111549709Restore will never be in power. Reform actually has a chance.
>>111545087>How did they find her?Lots of ways. Most people are bad at opsec and most websites twitter/discord/4chan etc will hand over identifying info at the drop of a hat if the police ask them for it.
>>111549749Someone said that she might have send cp as a reference to an artist and they reported her
>>111549641From The Independent:>The newspaper found that 37 police forces across England and Wales recorded 12,183 arrests in 2023 under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003 and Section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1988.>Not all police forces responded to its requests, so the real figure is likely higher.>It is an offence under these sections to send messages of a “grossly offensive” or “indecent, obscene or menacing” character or persistently use a public electronic communications network to cause “annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety”.The Nazi pug guy was arrested under the same law by the way
>>111549765who said that?
>>111549709>>111549761any right wing party is probably going to be against loli or porn art as well. look at the usa.
>>111549761Reform are just tories 2.0 with some labour rejects, farage already said they wouldn't deport anyone. He also want to join the war with iran, he's a spineless cuck that will lie and flipflop. Restore pushing on reform to be more rightwing is the most we could realisticly hope for.
>>111549749Possibilities in order of Severity and dumbassery:>1. She used/distributed CP as reference material and got reported>2. She distributed actual bestiality as reference material and got reported>3. At the most UK is stupid, she sent loli material as a reference and got marked as a distributor for cartoon porn
>>111549796Every party in britain would be, none of them are ever going to revoke this shit.
>>111549800The UK is a lot harsher on speech than the USA.And even in the USA you get people charged with obscenity:Like this woman who was arrested for giving out a comic book published by dark horse: >>>/co/153489189Or this woman arrested (and later acquitted) for wearing a inflatable penis haloween costume: https://www.courthousenews.com/penis-costume-protester-prevails-in-court/These are more absurd cases since they aren't even sexual, but they're more likely to be acquitted and these aren't as common.
>>111549781I swear I read somewhere that 'arrests' was used in a misleading way and they were just 'actions' where they sent a letter or something else that didn't result in an actual arrest in that report.
>>111549784Another anon in this thread theorising
>>111549800>>1. She used/distributed CP as reference material and got reportedis she that retarded? did she think she'd have no consequences? to artists too? doubt>>>2. She distributed actual bestiality as reference material and got reportedmmm maybe? probably easier to believe but still hard>>>3. At the most UK is stupid, she sent loli material as a reference and got marked as a distributor for cartoon pornyeah but someone must have reported personally, the AIs that catch illegal shit are not trained on drawings/the NCMEC doesnt care about them because they're too full of false positives
>>111549866>yeah but someone must have reported personally, the AIs that catch illegal shit are not trained on drawings/the NCMEC doesnt care about them because they're too full of false positivesThe NCMEC is from the USA. Different countries organizations care about different stuff.
>>111549796Well the most recent case in Indiana (Republican) determined loli porn is protected by first amendment
are pedos oppressed?
>>111549881>The NCMEC is from the USA. Different countries organizations care about different stuff.ALL social medias send stuff to NCMEC since they're all in the US.The NCMEC will later move the case to countries if they found real actual materialOf course this changes if again, someone PERSONALLY reported her to IWF (even tho they said themselves reporting drawings/non real things is useless and wastes resources) or police
>>111549900>Well the most recent case in Indiana (Republican) determined loli porn is protected by first amendmentSource?
>>111549900PATRIQTS if true
>>111549921The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) accepts reports about drawings.>You can confidentially report:> Child sexual abuse pictures or videos on the internet.> AI, animation, cartoon or 'drawn' child sexual abuse images.https://www.iwf.org.uk/en/uk-report/
>>111549935https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/in-court-of-appeals/116613118.html
>>111549866>is she that retarded? did she think she'd have no consequences? to artists too? doubtPossible she sent something she didn't consider CP. They both under some of the lowest levels in the UK but non-sexual nude images of kids (think like nudists of something) aren't by themselves illegal, but they become CP if it's believed they're being stored and shared for sexusl gratification. Could have found some pic of a nudist kid on its hands and knees playing in the sand or something and sent that. Same with clothed kids again if it's believed they're being stored and shared for sexual gratification.
>>111549860>>111549781Arrest just means being held by the police. If you go on facbook and threaten to beat up your ex wife and the police let you go with a warning then you'll be included in that statistic
>>111544521I'm not inclined to believe it is, because she hasn't done any stunts like this before.
>>111549900>>111549948>>111550021There's a pretty big difference in the opinions of judges (even republican appointed ones) and the opinions of republican politicians.Just because a judge interprets the law fairly in regards to obscenity, doesn't mean that a political party approves of the content being legal or the current state of the law. They might try to change the law in the future.
>>111550105How do you know? Are you the one single anon who actually knew who she was before all this?
>>111550130Yeah
>>111550180>Yeahhow do you think she got caught then if you know her a bit?
>>111550278No clue, just followed her on twitter
>>111550311>just followed her on twitterif you are him>twitterbruh
>>111550352I have no idea what you're talking about
Some of you are acting like she’s already guilty
>>111550065That statistic has an almost 10% Conviction rate and as in Mark Meechan's that law has been used to criminally prosecute people for their speech
>>111550433I see people on twitter saying she has
>>111532072>Reddit user's a "Major UK police force worker" Yeah and I'm a fucking government contractor jacking off to vtubers
So it's either:>She lied about all this>She's actually arrested but there's much more and worseFirst one I'd understand, she was a literal nobody and wanted to shit on britain, okay, she can just start from zero in a few monthsBut the second one? If she really had bad stuff wouldn't it have been the best if she just stayed quiet and accept the punishment? The moment peeps on the internet find about this it's even more over
>>111550747how did you come to that conclusion?
>>111550747Proof?
>>111550747Her friend claims it was only for drawn images, but until there a case number or she's charged there basically no proof beyond her word
>>111550747It's tracing. When the UK makes arrests like this, it always turns out to be tracing.
>>111550905>tracingtracing?
>>111550931Traced CSAM.
>>111550940I though all the art was commissioned?
The creator of liveleak tried to moralfag about it KEKhttps://x.com/KamuriSama/status/2050699407851667612
>>111551212how is he being the founder of liveleak relevant?do you know what liveleak is?>but it hosted Xright, someone used his service to upload something nasty, but what was the purpose of his site, why do you think it's called LIVELEAK you faggot, just because it's used by niggers posting themselves monkeying around and shooting each other all day long and people on the internet using it to make fun of them doesn't affect anythingI'm not even on the anti loli side, I love my cunny, but don't be fucking retarded about it
>>111551370Okay so why is he being a moralfaggot if he knew and allowed that stuff to stay up on there the whole time? I'm old enough to have browsed the site too, so why isn't he based instead of cringe?
>>111551370Nta but as a guy who actively profited from the mutilation and murder of people (sometimes kids) it's extremely funny seeing him trying to take the moral highground about anything - particularly cartoons.
>>111551212
>>111551454I guarantee you there were people who were, and he absolutely knew they were.
>>111550130Diff anon here but knew/had DMs with Mimi from private groups since early last year, before she decided to work towards streaming stuff. Can confirm all the art was either commissioned by her or fanarts. Her accs were already getting mass reported since back then; considering the content prob just flagged too many times that the bobbies took notice or something. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
>>111551370>>111551434>>111551437The point is it makes him a hypocrite.
>>111551212I've seen so many videos of indian and chinese children being crushed by elevators and escalators in this guy's site lol
>>111551434>>111551437this is just apples to oranges, I'm not saying he's not a retard for whining about cartoons, he is, but that's got nothing to do with liveleak because liveleak was literally just 'youtube but you can post shit that youtube doesn't allow', if you then go and remove shit from your site based on your own feelings 'oh no not the kids teehee' then what the fuck is the point of the site?it's a breach of confidence, the entire purpose of the site was uploading shit and if you try to moderate it then it just loses all appeal, why do you think 4chan is appealing? how ironic is it that people posting on here don't understand the idea behind people being able to post whatever the fuck they want?mind you, until the feds get mad about it, so sadly there are still some things we can't do, but that's another subjectso on one hand you have a guy that built a service that allows people to post shit that youtube won't take and some people used it to post shit that youtube won't host, and on the other you have a, alleged, victim of bongistan retardation because she herself was getting porn of her cunny avatar, I don't understand how you can't see the difference here, on one hand you have a person doing something they can't do in their third world country and on the other you have someone that built something that some people might've used in an amoral manner
>>111551666do you believe the kids would still be alive if his site didn't exist?
>>111551735Yes
>>111551735No why would I? What kind of retarded false equivalence are you attempting?
>>111551666>I've seen so many videos of indian and chinese children being crushed by elevators and escalators in this guy's site lolok satan.
>>111532072It doesn't matter, drawings should never be illegal no matter how "egregious" they are, imagine getting arrested for the "crime" of moving a pencil across a paper, bonkers.
>>111551682I'm past the point of caring about the difference, either the guy can be logical and based, or cringe and gay. It baffles how he can be cringe and gay after seeming to put his own neck on the line for freedom 20 years ago.
>>111551607As an addendum, would like to point out that her new discord acc originally also had the full name as its username for the first day before being changed to its current one soon after her new twitter acc got deleted. Haven't asked her about it but she possibly received advice or negotiated that it wasn't necessary for a private discord acc and wanted to curb further spread of her identity for personal safety reasons once the posts blew up.
>>111551784>false equivalencebig words for such a small brain, but lemme try to explain it still in a way you might understand;cunny bunny goes 'ohhh make porn of me please' in muslim land; turns out she didn't have a license for it, but she's the one that did it all on her ownold boomer funds and make site that allows people to post kids dying in accidents etc; not his problem, platform serves its purpose, people would post those videos everywhere else if they could; but they can't, it's not about a demand and offer situation, it's not about a 'lemme buy something that's illegal' thingnow try to use your big boy brain and use words you understand and see if you still can't understand the difference here or if you're just as stupid as that twittertard>>111551853that's a much better take and I completely agree with you now senpai
>>111549836I'm surprised people are surprised. I thought everyone knew the european police regularly picked people up for weird skebs they commissioned.
>>111532062Trump should have been threatening the UK instead of Greenland
>>111551974>I thought everyone knew the european police regularly picked people up for weird skebs they commissioned.Articles about htis?
>>111551946You're schizophrenic and your small brain can't process why someone who profits out of child gore and industrial accidents should not claim someone who draws child erotica should be glad they're not executed in a wood chipper you fucking moron, both are degenerates and one is claiming the high ground
>>111552014you do not understand the concept of freedom of speech, so I will therefore ask you to post hand or assume you're one of those, and I can safely point at you and make fun of you and your country for being retarded and irrelevant, that's all
>>111552067You're allowed to criticize someone's speech you imbecile, how dumb are you? He's a hypocrite
https://youtu.be/QPEQBdmqXzY?si=fh2VCQ8OiLQ1LlnQAnother stupid whore trying to defend getting jailed for cartoons
>>111552067Dud that guy is a retard trying to have the moral high ground
>>111552123The thing that pisses me off the most is that she was a fucking vtweeter, she had never streamed, she never even made a video
>>111551974Most normies won't feel censorship until they gotta look at an infographic popup before downloading any digital content like the dangerous goods chart at the airport
So what are they gonna do if i just.....keep doing it anyway? Will they really give you life in Bongistan just for drawing shit?
>>111551212The other funny thing is he's British too, and I'm sure he got taken to court at one point by the government at one point because of the site (might be misremembering that though).>>111552249No given the state of the prisons at the moment it probably wouldn't even be a custodial sentence. You would get prison for a few years if they caught you a second time (and obviously there's about a 100% chance they will given the restrictions). You're also on the sex offenders register for life which I imagine is pretty fucking awful.
>>111552249Three years in prison apparently
Just a reminder that British cops are unarmed so if you can get your hands on a gun you can hunt them down unimpeded until a tactical team shows up.
>>111552383Nah, like I said above it'll be a suspended sentence because the prisons are both Victorian buildings that have hardly ever been renovated so falling apart, and massively overcrowded at the moment. Even people involved in actual violent crime are getting suspended sentences.
>>111552406Most of them are manlets, women, or fat fucks so you don't even need a gun
>>111552465Hopefully its not like the US where probation costs an arm and a leg and is basically set up to fail.
>>111551212>thrown into a... [link to x]the fucking horror of it all!
>>111548956wrongfiction should not be punishable at all, no matter how gross
>>111552677She'd get sent to some lefty support group for real nonces
>>111532848RAAASHIIIDOOOOOO
what went wrong with the UK?
>>111553613globohomo socialist (prog./fabian variety in the UK) satanic elite embedded in various spheres of power and influence
>>111532072Same cops that turn a blind eye to grooming gangs trafficking children btw.
>>111551974>. I thought everyone knew the european police regularly picked people up for weird skebs they commissioned.Me when I lie:
>>111532072I don't believe this for a second when the police covered up decades of systemic rape of native British girls, thousands of victims, all because they were fearful of anti-immigrant backlash and still to this day, the government refuses to actually perform a dutiful investigation. I don't believe the police or the government for a fucking second.I think what the UK are doing is deliberately finding these low hanging fruit so that they can bump up their arrest rate for child sex crimes to justify their internet censorship.>Look guys, we just have to take your anonymity, look at all these predators we have caught so far, clearly it's workingBecause nobody is going to investigate each case of 'child pornography' and when normies read that term, they think of the worst of the worst.
>>111556239I'm pretty sure most normalfags would agree with her being arrested if they saw what she commissioned, they are basically sheep that can't separate fiction from reality until it fucks them over personally in some way
>>111544966This makes me believe it was faked now.
>>111544828A man got three in years prison for teaching his dog to perform a Roman salute.
>>111556352Dankula never got sent to prison, I think he had to pay a fine
>>111553613losing to the americans 250 years ago mindbroke them and things havent been the same ever since
>>111556342I think normalfags would agree with it being some sort of lower tier crime. But if you asked them is this on the same level as real child porn, the vast majority would balk at accepting that since they are clearly different. But the government has no plans on make that delineation for accuracy and fairness since it doesn't serve their agenda.
Akiman, the legendary artist who designed Chun-Li, drew her in support.https://x.com/akiman7/status/2050276988334870652/photo/1
>>111548956
Why so many anons here seem to want to defend the sanctity of the UK legal system?
>>111556812Why are so many people willing to believe a literal who vtweeter that had no online presence before this whole thing?
>>111556851Because this is something that could easily happen in Russia (but regarding other topics), and the UK is way worse with censorship than Russia now. Pretty straightforward.
>>111556851Because this sounds like something the UK would do.
>>111556348>sees photo evidence>"This makes me believe it was faked now."Actual flat earther behaviourIf you're so eager to believe everything on the internet is faked, then you should by extension believe everything is a nothingburger that doesn't affect your life anyways, and you should go touch grass instead of following this thread.
>>111556851What reasons do you have for doubting this? Couldn't it be they arrested her and let her be online as long as her activities are SFW because while they consider loli to be obscene ilegal material it's still not as bad as actual CSAM?
>>111557030Are you her friend? You've been seething super hard about people being skeptical
>>111557043Because she is a literal who vtweeter, I could not find a single thing about her from before this stuff
>>111557089Why does this matter?
>>111557112Because the people spamming about this shit are the usual dramafag political grifters
>>111557132Who cares? That doesn't change anything about the case itself.
>>111540414The South has been diligently chipping away at the protections and are in striking distance of also making this a crime.
>>111557132>clearly politically charged issue>>wtf why are all these people who like discussing politics talking about it?Are you just pretending to be retarded or what? Also you didn't answer the question.
>>111557053Yes, I don't have any reason to hide that fact nor deny intrinsic bias in favour of her.I agree skepticism is healthy and natural, especially for such controversial events. I also believe everyone has a right to have, express and discuss their opinions freely.However, I also doubt that people giving one-liner replies with no elaboration are engaging in good faith or interested in discussion/uncovering of facts at all.
>>111557383They're either from sharty/kiwifarms or reddit. They don't want a lolicon martyr.
>>111557030>Extreme pushbackThat just makes it more likely to be faked.>But these papers!I'll wait for the actual publicly available documents, and not something some random 2 view posted.
>>111557184>>111557199>useful retards falling for the ploycrazy what niggas will do for a crumb of vpussy
>>111557615>everything is a psyopWhat's it like living with psychosis?
>>111557558>lolicon martyrshouldn't they be more concerned about the incredibly authoritarian, and even totalitarian, measure? the content could have been guro as much as loli
>>111557643That's how kiwifarmers are.
>>111557643>random no name (((girl))) that has plans to start streaming but has nothing to back her up all of a sudden becomes the center of attention of the FOTM big drama>inconsistencies everywhere>nothing makes sense, no real proof, only random pictures of papers that could be fake>couldn't even figure out how to coincide what was written on said papers and what she was trying to claim at first on her socials>simps all over the place going 'OMG UK SO BAD POOR GIRL'is this your first time on the internet maybe? are you new around here?
>>111557710>irrelevant claim>claim with no proof>claim with no proof>claim with no proof>irrelevant claimOh so you are just retarded.
>>111557710were you also this skeptical about count dankula?
>>111557612>>"Extreme pushback"If touching grass is extreme for you I almost feel kinda bad anon>I'll wait for the actual publicly available documentsFair enough, though if officially cleared of wrongdoing, I hope such a source is able to do so without further intruding on her ability to live normally as a harmless citizen.Personally I remain cynical of the establishment's ability to directly admit its own idiocy, so if no official source ever shows up and the UK police fail to deny the validity of the documents shown, I lean towards the arrest etc. being the unfortunate truth.
>>111558039Your hostility proved otherwise.I'm just skeptical of anything pushed here unless it can be confirmed by a legit soure. And dramatubers and election tourists aren't that. Plus there's the fact that why would they allow her to keep her social media considering the charges and she claims all her electronics were seized.
>>111558098>considering the chargesnta but she's not been charged, she's on bail. If you read earlier in the thread (before it just became retards argue and was actual discussion) it was explained multiple times it's not unusual for people on bail even for these crimes to still have access to social media.
We truly live in the worst timeline
>>111558098>why would they allow her to keep her social media considering the chargesI can't say as to the exact handling procedure, but she was likely required to give her existing account details to the police for their investigations/potential evidence-gathering, not affecting her ability to log in to said accounts. The police would already have an active eye out for her, so if any activity was not approved, they could simply bring down the hammer hard. Copying the existing accounts' data or locking them would be logical to prevent evidence tampering but it's possible that for a low-stakes case they decided supervision was sufficient and skipped protocol (if it even is protocol in the UK, idk).>she claims all her electronics were seizedAs per the bail terms, as long as her device is capable of displaying browsing history and she does not delete said history, she isn't prevented from borrowing or acquiring replacement devices to use, so this alone doesn't serve to prove or disprove anything.It's also entirely possible that, given the original arrest and seizure was several days prior, that the police already finished examining her devices and returned them to her, at which point she was able to publicly post about her situation on her original account on her own device(s).To reiterate, I obviously have a bias as her friend to support her, so just take these theories as food for thought with however much salt you desire.
>>111558531>finished examining her devices and returned them to herNo, absolutely not. You get them back in a couple of months if at all. It's quite common for them simply get lost forever somehow - or permanently broken because some retard dropped a storage box on them or something.
>>111558720Guess I still clung to a tiny bit of idealism with that theory.More likely that she just acquired a new device to use then.
other thread>>111531720>>111531720
>>111540728This is true for US too. Cops will try to talk to you before arresting you if possible to get more info. Since this is "voluntary" it can be used in court. The difference in the uk is you do not have a right to be silent. If you don't answer questions that you know the answer it will be used against you in court.>What if it's actual CPThe UK literally arrested someone for reposting a meme of the lgbtqia+ flags shaped into a swastika and told him "Someone has been caused anxiety based on your social media post. This is why you have been arrested" https://www.hrla.org.au/uk_man_arrested_for_social_media_memeThey deserve no benefit of doubt.
