>>5962346
Mildly disturbing at best. In your scene, was the vomit rice? Did the face being pulled off also become a bag of rice? AI is getting better. It just needs to make some sense.

>>5962847
computers are discrete 1s and 0s they are not conscious just simulations of consciousness

You thought smartphones are the bane of society?

MOAR

>>5962852
How do you know you are conscious and not experiencing a simulation? Does it matter? What's the difference?

>>5962408
AI not making sense is the best part.

Why does it feel like im watching gore

File: chickens.mp4 (4.78 MB, 1080x1080)

4.78 MB MP4

OYYYYYYY DOCTOS 'O THREAD

2 hours of pvre 'o
https://youtu.be/r8Ljx3SP03Y

>>5964325
not that anon, but. you don't "know", but you just know. if you don't know that you are conscious you are literally an npc.
>What's the difference?
between consciousness and simulation of consciousness? technically speaking, that doesn't even make sense because consciousness cannot be simulated, as it refers to the inherently subjective experience of the world, whereas "simulation" refers to a substitution of an actual experience (like flying, driving, whatever) by a virtual experience, where both of these experiences, the actual and the virtual, refer to outer component or environment of the experience.

so the question you are really asking is whether consciousness can arise by imitation of material processes which are considered to be linked to consciousness. this is a highly speculative question as we have practically no understanding at all of the phenomenon of consciousness, but it already implicitly presumes that consciousness itself arises from material processes, which to me seems like a bogus idea, but whatever. but even if that was the case, there is no reason why it should arise from the imitation of these material processes. the entire consideration is just really stoner-tier philosophy and the best argument for entertaining this sort of reasoning is to say that "by occam's razor we should prefer a materialistic explanation of consciousness over a non-materialistic one because it makes less demands of reality", which still is extremely stupid because we don't even have any explanation of consciousness to begin with and occam's razor doesn't really make a claim about what reality possible can be but only about what an effective description of reality is supposed to be.

>>5964325
repeatability and global consensus. god you fuckers are dumber beyond repair

>>5965393
How can consensus matter if you can't be sure other people exist? Not really arguing against you, but this is pretty basic philosophical stuff you're just taking for granted

>>5965404
How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real

>>5964325
shut up

>>5965595
>>5964333
>>5964331
What are you using to make these? Please

>>5964333
Kino

>>5962346
That's crazy. Here is something that's crazy that's not AI and is on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwGuISZOoIA

>>5962852
>computers
>not conscious
Well, define what you understand under "conscious(ness)", and we can argue all day, if you'd like to.
Otherwise there is no point.
I have had the suspicion for a while now, that reality can be represented lossless in the integers, so the discreteness of computers wouldn't pose a problem there.
Practically all physical limits we encounter point at everything being a ginormous number of local calculations (on integers).

For us to exist all that was required is, that we are mathematically describable.
Say, all the digits of Pi exist. It doesn't matter if anyone is actively calculating them.

>>5965595
Well, I (>>5966325) would argue, that reality isn't "real", but integer.

>>5964325
>>5965404
>>5966325
I know that I'm conscious because I can understand that I'm conscious. I also have the ability to feel things through sensory systems.
you people aren't as intelligent as you think you are asking these tired old "philosophical" questions

>>5966618
>I know that I'm conscious because I can understand that I'm conscious. I also have the ability to feel things through sensory systems.

That's the most retarded thing I've read in a long time.

>>5966617
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

>>5966695
nah you're just either some flavour of non-white, therefore mentally retarded. or you're some faggot who watched the matrix and thinks he has some deep esoteric knowledge of the universe, therefore you are still mentally retarded

>>5966618
>I'm conscious because I can understand that I'm conscious.
Look, I can get behind "cogito ergo sum", but "conscio sum ergo conscio sum" is BS: You are running in circles.
>I also have the ability to feel things through sensory systems.
Machines can also feel things through sensors and react accordingly.

this is the only kind of AIslop that I actually enjoy
not sure what that says about me

It feels like i'm staring into someone's nightmare
Why is AI so good at replicating the feel of a dream?

>>5966617
So it is true what they say about asians

>>5963132
This is a dark synth like good song.
Not sure what band it reminds me it of something 80's but more modern spin on it, the song definitely made it worth watching till the end,

>>5962852
Humans are just electrochemical signals and gaps. They are also 0's and 1's to a large degree.

>>5966617
wow

>>5967162
The difference is we have eternal drive/need built in us right, we must always go, look forward to something, create something, express something, simply to do without anyone telling us.

Computers/machines will sit eternally without actin, motionless without someone giving them commands/inputs/prompts.
There is not drive no need no want on it's own.

>>5967162
>They are also 0's and 1's to a large degree.
Can you talk more about how you see this..

>>5963132
The Teletubbies in a Soviet alternate reality

>>5967057
The uncomfortable truth is that our brains are basically formulaic meat computers, not dissimilar to AI

>>5967051
Still not as creepy as that guy who cosplays as Goofy IRL

>>5967162
No, human consciousness is not binary. Neurons do not function as 1 and 0. Computers and human consciousness are fundamentally different.


Here's an ai summary:
No, neurons are not binary in the way a computer's logic gates are binary; while their action potentials are often described as an all-or-nothing "spike or no spike" signal, this is an oversimplification. Information in the brain is represented through complex, graded electrochemical signals, the frequency and timing of these spikes, and the strength of synaptic connections, not by simple binary 1s and 0s.
Why neurons aren't truly binary
Graded potentials:
Dendrites receive signals that are usually graded potentials—changes in membrane potential that vary in size, rather than being all-or-nothing.
Synaptic communication:
Most synaptic signaling involves chemical neurotransmitters, resulting in a graded, not a binary, response in the receiving neuron.
Information encoding:
The brain encodes information through the rate and pattern of neuron firing, as well as the changing strengths of the connections (synapses) between neurons.
Non-deterministic nature:
Unlike a digital computer, the brain is non-deterministic and processes information through statistical approximations, not precisely reproducible sequences.
The role of "binary" signals (action potentials)
All-or-nothing:
When a neuron reaches a certain threshold of stimulation, it fires an action potential, a rapid electrical impulse, in an all-or-nothing fashion.
A simplified analogy:
This "spike" or "no spike" can be seen as a binary-like signal, but it is just one component of a much more complex electrochemical communication system.
Frequency and timing:
The information isn't just in the "on" or "off" state, but in how often these spikes occur and how they are timed in relation to each other.

>>5967118
Sounds quite a bit like Kraftwerk. Listen to Metropolis for instance.

>>5967664
One look at a scan of how many synapses a single neuron really has should answer this for anyone not retarded

>>5967118
>>5967673
Straight up half of all oldskool goth music sounds like this
Bauhaus are overrated and awful idgaf

>>5966572
When you look out the window in Barotrauma

>>5967051
That was cool

>>5969598
>>5969599
Sauce on these two? Love the dream like atmosphere

>>5966572
Nope. Can't even look at it.

>>5967059
Kek

>>5969607
Why does seeing only part of a face feels so weird?

>>5969661
The first one is the only actually bad one

>>5969668
It's the tamest.

>>5969707
Most of the other shit is just overtuned and not believable.
>le ayy lmao jellyfish
>literally just a skyrim dragon
I will concede the one long snake is quite bad too

>>5969666
Prey instinct

>>5967059
What do they say? WHAT DO THEY SAY!!?

>>5969778
As if the peeking face was a hidden predator, waiting to hunt me, you mean?

>>5964741
moar plz

File: 1752441851993906.mp4 (3.92 MB, 404x720)

3.92 MB MP4

>>5962346

>>5963132
childrens' media gets weird as shit when you think about how they might be if they were actually real

>>5967656
true

>>5969607
cool

>>5967059
how can you blame them, that cat wanted to be eaten

>>5962346
>>5962841
>>5962845
really good idea to let kids be online and watch this stuff while their brains are developing the most. yup no need to ban usage of any kind of anti-social media platform before the age of 16. instead what we need is government ID verification of all adults so the kids are protected from porn, that's what's rotting their brains the most.

>>5970308
you are literally like the people who fought cars when they first started appearing. old man yelling at cloud. this is fucking beautiful, actually, and personally? I cant wait until this is all there is.

>>5970316
yes that's totally the same. it's not like there's already signs of kids having worse mental health than ever, being unable to get friends or romance, i'm sure watching videos indistinguishable from reality where people's faces are ripped apart and eels crawl out of their throat is just fine, mixed in with actual real videos so that kids don't know which is fake and which is real.

>>5970184
"so, do I just pick one?"

>>5970184
Wasn't creepy at least

>>5970308
yes, surely the satanic pedos in the government know what's best for your children, and they've certainly proven they can be trusted with more power over you and your kids. no wonder the people in power have such respect for the common man, with sparkling examples of wisdom like you.

>>5970184
1 ticket please.

>>5970319
Anon, my generation grew up with rotten.com.

File: Underwater.webm (1.88 MB, 320x240)

1.88 MB WEBM

>>5966572
>>5969661

>>5970381
they arr rook same but after 0.24 there's one in a blue skirt, then one in a white skirt then one in red shorts.
so you get 3, they clearly want to be noticed.
watch out though, it's probably a trick - witches tend to come in threes

>>5970179
Is that the fucking city capture sfx from civ 4??

>>5970743
The difference is, now the mainstream media know about it.
And so they infer a causality with the increased number of psychological defects with young ones these days.
That this is more likely a result of the constant legacy media propaganda and public schools "teaching" extremist ideology, while completely neglecting the shit pupils are actually supposed to learn in school, because that would lead to "discrimination" against "minorities", doesn't fit into their world-view. It's way too inconvenient.
Honestly: If I hadn't been of-age for quite a while when the campaign to destroy the Western world launched for real, I'd probably be a mental wreck by now.

The fascism of the 21st century is called anti-fascism, and it demands of everyone to walk off the cliff in formation while their benevolent fuhrers are watching from the side eating gluten-free bread and organic produce.

>>5970743
it's very strange you think that is even comparable, i guess you can't realize what the difference is

>>5971059
guess i wasn't very helpful with that post so i should type out the difference clearly

rotten.com "generation"
>you actively visit a website where there are fucked up things, setting yourself in "i will see fucked up things" mode
>you actively click things that you know will be fucked up
>you are like 5% of the kids that actually did visit such websites on a regular basis
>even if you decided to click every single video on those websites the content would run out, some friction to move onto another video

ai horror generation
>you're just "using internet", default brain mode
>fake reality videos are mixed in with real reality videos with no warning that you will see something fucked up or fake
>applies to 90% of all kids since it happens on all anti-social platforms
>infinite content on an infinite list of videos, on a platform designed to keep you scrolling away your whole day, no friction to see more

now i feel like i've done what i can

File: 1748236565730886.mp4 (5.26 MB, 1280x720)

5.26 MB MP4

would like to know the souece of this, who created it and if there are more music videos like this

>>5971063
yes you've explained it very well. The other day I talked to my son about stupid tv showes and showed him the intro of the teletubbies, for fun and explaining tv was always mostly mind numbingly dumb and there were tv programs for babies even then. Babies/toddlers shouldn't watch tv anyways. Nowadays you got garbage like cocomelon
>inb4 bluey fags telling me there are good toddler showes
he's allowed to watch tv, but there needs to be a limit. I don't have any streaming shit, no netflix and all that on demand garbage. Only live transmissions of actual tv. If spongebob stops airing at 20:00, so be it. The other time he was over at a friends place and their parents don't care what their son watches on their smart tv. He simply put squid game on. I am talking about 8 year old kids... My son understood they weren't supposed to watch this walked out of the room and talked with me about it later on, had to explain that other kids grow up with different house rules, or none thereof. I read to him almost daily since he got interested in books, we watch showes and movies together, he got a switch 2 which is his first own electrical device with a computer inside (always offline). Children can have these things, but under supervision and offline. I am just writing this because >>5963132
is such a perfect example of what I have personnally shown my son just few days ago for a funny explanation, didn't make much of it myself but now seeing this

I can comprehend these manmade horrors somewhat, but not children. They'd have nightmares for weeks.

>>5971200
squid game at eight? talk about becoming desensitized. keeping him offline is great, hope you can manage that for a few more years.
if i have a kid i would probably give him old cartoons to watch and make the cutoff year 1999, but would probably need to pirate those and who would have the time to find downloads of them

>>5970308
If you’re a parent, monitor and restrict what your kids do and consume online. It’s not that hard; workplaces manage to do it for adults. We have no excuse not to do this anymore, like tech illiterate boomers did. The bigger problem is that parents take the easy way out and throw a tablet in front of their kid from day one, playing cocomelon and brainrot on repeat. Sitting a child down in front of cocomelon all day would have an even more detrimental effect than most AI slop anyway.

>>5971184
@Doopiidoo on youtube

>>5971538
DUDE THANK YOU!!! I 've been asking every now and then for some few months

I'm about to show these to my dog and you can't stop me.

File: zoomer-tide-pods.gif (15 KB, 220x189)

15 KB GIF

>>5971063
>>5971200
Not that anon but I am a zoomer and I dunno it sounds like a personal problem. When I was a wee lad if something scary popped up on youtube or new grounds or any other flash site or whatever I'd just close the tab. Mostly spent internet time playing flash games or watching vids of minecraft gamers or comic nerds talking about characters (mostly toy reviews tho) I never even knew existed. I think the scummy tv show guy from the old game Harvester makes a good point. "If kids watch it that says more about them than it does me." On one hand he's still a greedy apathetic asshole but on the other hand I think he's got a point. I never actively looked for gore and when it came up I used the nicer things I knew of as a pallet cleanser. My dad had violent games on the family console but I didn't care much for them. I think if kids look at violence and copy it that's a sign they're just inherently violent and if they're scared well I'd hope they're smart enough to do the sorta things I did to cope. I mean I dunno I had Vine for a bit during middle school but I kinda got bored and haven't even considered getting tiktok so I guess just get lucky with your kid I dunno. But I genuinely do believe that if your kid enjoys violent media that's your genetics fault not the media itself.

>>5971780
Besides it could always be a phase lots of people have edgy phases growing up. I mean I guess one has to just teach kids reality from fiction.

>>5970178
Moonmoon finally getting out and meeting new people after abandoning his kid and cheating on his wife

>>5962852
We both know you have not put any real thought into what consciousness is. You know because you didn't do it, I know because of the silly words that you wrote. I might even argue that you are displaying a lack of consciousness.

>>5971780
why does everybody apply their own lived experience and reason that it should be fine since it worked out for you.
there's a big difference between the current no-friction-endless-scrolling-90%-coverage and what you and a low percentage of kids experienced in the past Internet era. the first step to recognizing the risk is to recognize the difference. i mean we're already seeing a big drop in intelligence in kids these days compared to kids before 2010, and now these kids will also be shown a false reality. a falsehood that might not even be recognizable unless you are old enough to realize that it is false.
for example, i saw an AI video of a gorilla rescuing a baby that had fallen into its habitat at the zoo. depending on how young the kid is he will then have a world view of gorillas sometimes rescuing kids, instead of understanding that that baby would have been torn apart in the real world. that's just an example, there's all sorts of incorrect realities that will be painted. on top of the spooky stuff of course. if you're old enough already that shit will wash off you but while your brain is developing and you have no reference to how the real world works it can really screw you up. say that kids swipe 10 videos and 4 of them are fake, how many kids will spot all 4 of them as being fake? how many will spot 2? how many kids will even care to bother to understand if what they see is real or not?

>>5963132
Still one of the best.

>>5964744
ohnonononono what is this....

somehow I have stumbled onto a thread full of troons and third worlders
how peculiar

>>5964744
I found this one to be the most disturbing in the thread. Should be used to try to make people vegans.

>>5962847
Source on this?

>>5970308
While this stuff is weird, it doesn't give me the same feeling of fear as a jumpscare or the same disgust as gore. Maybe we'll get there someday.

>>5970184
which JAV?

>>5971844
Well I mean you're supposed to teach the younger generations right from wrong but most parents just sat their kids in front of the tv or in today's case a tablet. I mean you keep referencing tiktok so it's as easy as just not giving them tiktok. If the average joe's kid is dumb because he sits them in front of his phone and teaches him nothing I don't think that inherently means your's will be dumb too unless you were to poorly parent in that same way.

>>5962845
lmao nice
It feels like i'm tripping on some shady psychedelic

>>5972411
It's impossible to "teach" your kid out of all possible fake videos he will see online, denying access to anti-social media is the only way to go.

>>5970308
You should kill your self, right now.

>>5971403
I have neighbors who let their children watch squid game. They fucked up their kids development in ways I didn't think possible.

>>5970186
This is what I see when a boomer tries talking to me

>>5964325
exactly. whoever said that the world isn't supposed to be a simulation, and even if it was what would that meaningfully change?

Are there are legit horror made with AI? The power of AI to create creatures of imagination is quite good.

>>5972385
The Cars prequel is looking pretty strange.

>>5972878
good morning sir

>>5970184
Do not pick up any wild JC. Leave them in their natural habitat or your will be fined.

>>5970315
thats a beautiful piano tune in the background

File: m'lady.gif (323 KB, 401x353)

323 KB GIF

>>5973058
mornin'

>>5970315
Matthew 7:15

File: Will Smith eating Spaghetti.mp4 (4.86 MB, 640x360)

4.86 MB MP4

a classic

>>5962346
Nice, love these threads, good one bro.

>>5964747
How do u know you're experiencing a simulation and not just conscious?

>>5970184
I'd fuck every one of them.

>>5973559
My favorite desu. Kinda scary this was like what 3 years ago?

>>5962847
Praise the Machine God. Praise the Omnissiah.

>>5973559
Thanks, I was looking for that.
Early GAI content was almost more fun than now. It's kind of mad how far we have come.

>>5973584
We know, Mr President.

>>5970315
I wanna see more crazy fusions

I have successfully jerked off to every webm in this thread.

File: asmongold.webm (3.86 MB, 1920x1080)

3.86 MB WEBM

>>5962346

>>5970315
schizophrenia speedrun jfc

File: scarjo satanic spaghett.webm (3.73 MB, 720x720)

3.73 MB WEBM

>>5973559

>>5962845
This one makes me ill moreso than any gore or grossout content.

This legitimately made me almost too sick to continue the thread.

IDK what it is about it, its clearly fake and the insides are noodles, but something just scratches a part of my brain that makes me feel disgusting.

it's just a coincidence these look and behave just like our dreams right?

>>5973562
in 5 years we're going to look at current ai videos like we do this one

>>5970186
Looooool

>>5976240
that video is not even 4 years old.
if things continue nonlinearly make that 2 years.

>>5962847
Out of all midwits, scifi writers sure love the smell of their own farts the most.

>>5966325
Life forms evolved to have the will to compete for survival and reproduction. Computers are not comparable.

>>5967051
>:28 - :32 mark
I really shouldn't stick my dick in that... however

>>5970184
Heaven seems kinda dark but I can't wait. 40 virgins was an understatement

>>5971184
check asap rocky, "taylor swif"

>>5976483
>Computers are not comparable.
It's not about if computers are "comparable" to humans.
It's about if reality can be locally described in integer arithmetic, which looks extremely conceivable to me.

I suspect, space and time won't end up being discrete in the measures we use to describe them, but that at a fundamental level they are discrete after all and representable in the integers.
A real eye-opener to me was learning, that the maximum amount of information a spherical chunk of space can hold, is proportional to the surface area of the sphere and not to its volume.
That strongly hints at us being a projection from some (local) 2D-plane and the fundamental discreteness potentially being smeared in the 3D-projection we live in.
Another option would obviously be things like Wolfram's hypergraph, but I'm not well-versed in those.

I'm definitely long on reality being locally equivalent to some Turing Machine's computation.

>>5969968
oddly enough, the creepiest part of this was how realistic the girls face looks

>>5976881
>the maximum amount of information a spherical chunk of space can hold, is proportional to the surface area of the sphere and not to its volume
The surface and the volume are proportional to eachother, so nothing can be proportional to one but not the other, midwit. Besides, reality can only be understood through empiricism, not arbitrary mathematical abstractions, you are confusing language with meaning.

>>5976980
>The surface and the volume are proportional to eachother [...]
No. The surface is proportional to r^2, while the volume is proportional to r^3. r^2 is NOT proportional to r^3.
I take that to indicate, that there is some gross misunderstanding about the fundamental reality, which explains why we haven't found a way to discretize space and time, yet.
The "empiricism" you (rightfully) demand in this context are black holes: They form exactly when the information limit for a chunk of space is approached.

>>5969968
Dude what the fuck

>>5962847
death to videodrome

>>5973562
lol its crazy thinking about how amazing this seemed when it first came out

>>5973562
feed this to AI, have it remake it

>>5977405
It still is pretty amazing.
It has some soul, that more recent AI produce does not have.
Which is not to say, that the more recent stuff was worse, but you know what I mean, right?

>>5970184
when you tell japs to make kids and all you get back is that fluoride stare

>>5970184
I'm suddenly beginning to understand how some cultures were ok with arranged marriage.

>>5967656
don't evoke his name here.

>>5970184
WOULD

>>5963132
how would you handle this situation?

>>5977948
They seriously need to start fucking before they cease to exist.

>>5966833
>>I know that I'm conscious because I identify as conscious.

What is a woman?

>>5967628
Bu-bu-but... I thought that pointing out any similarities between the human brain and AI was techbro slop rhetoric and totally untrue? The supreme Court said so in that recent copyright case! And the GOVERNMENT IS NEVER WRONG!!!!!!!!

>>5970319
>>kids unable to get romance! They need romance! Minors and romance!

Are you on The List too, anon?

>>5970308
I agree with you, anon. Had I seen this shit as a child I would be traumatized

>>5978283
It fumbled a little with the bookshelf, but it was an excellent display overall. If such effects could be done cheaply, they could make for some really nice game effects.

>>5970315
This one's real, this happened

>>5978283
This is really awesome

>>5978247
funfact: japan has higher birthrates than whites in europe and america

>>5979001
At least there's one place on the planet that's trying.

>>5979001
the muslims that moved there really bumps the stats

>>5970924
sounds like it

>>5979082
Natives in Japan, anon. You ever think about how your media feeds you memes about the japanese going extinct while your people in your own country have even worse birthrates?

>>5979350
yah bruh, japs aren't in trouble in fact they will have more people than india in 2030. we been lied to.

>>5977969
I would listen

>>5979362
I didn't say they're not in trouble. Try reading the words on your screen. Whites have even lower birthrates. Why does nobody ever mention that statistic but the go-to joke for every dumb faggot talking about japan is "lol birthrates" I wonder?

>>5979538
bet you think that Chinese birthrates are real

File: world.gif (439 KB, 3840x2160)

439 KB GIF

the real problem is here. how the hell are they going to feed themselves when they outnumber whites by 1000%?
looking at https://www.populationpyramid.net/africa/2024/ africa's data is an actual pyramid, if we feed them another 75 years they will be 3.8 billion people. europe is only 0.6 billion by then.

>>5979542
I'm not sure why you're seething so hard at me and hitting me with random unrelated shit when all I'm telling you is to compare two statistics

AI is the antichrist

>>5963132
Which vid generator even is this

>>5964729
I came here to spooky not to cum

>>5979566
idk why we feed them at all

>>5978283
sauce?

>>5979656
So we can then import them, which will boost our economy because population growth is economical growth.

>>5979656
So that childless elderly women have a way to feel better about themselves.

>>5969968
swear to god, shit like this makes me think that AI is just getting closer and closer to making videos that will instill instant horror in people to such a degree that they're instantly traumatised and can be further bent to its will

>>5980070
good thing nobody needs your thinking skills

>>5980075
who needs thinking when AI can do it for us?

Synergy
Who needs the sun if you have plants

File: Winston_Smith.gif (674 KB, 500x268)

674 KB GIF

>>5970308
>what we need is government ID verification
No, what we need are free-speech-respecting online spaces free of glowies and shills like you who want the Web to be privacyless so Big Brother can track everyone's online discourse.

>>5980224
Pretty sure he was speaking sarcastically.

>>5979681
that is not correct.
you absolute fucking retard.

>>5979681
I wonder why Israel doesn't want free economic growth.

>>5980402
What's your explanation then, enlightened autist?

>>5980402
That is exactly how it works. Name one country without population growth that isn't economically stagnating or even declining.

>>5980466
Because they siphon all their money from the US via AIPAC, where free economic growth is underway and whites will be outnumbered in a couple years. They do import a lot of people though: Jews from western countries only.

>>5971780
bro yappin' like we gonna read all dat like nigga stfu.

>>5980544
>ooga booga bix nood muh fugga

>>5969668
what do you mean? what is "bad" about any of them?

>>5970308
2000s era screamers were way more traumatizing than this and we turned out just fine.

>>5980661
No, we really didn't turn out fine, although it wasn't because of the screamers.

>>5980661
No, I can't watch any horror movies with screamers or cars in the wild because of that.

>>5962852
I was thinking about this and it doesn't matter because we don't actually understand why we're conscious.

A machine that pretends it's conscious is good enough outwardly because consciousness exists for people that experience it.

>>5964333
David Bowie companion

>>5969968
Would do the girl

>>5981803
isn't that you in the video already?

>>5967664
One can imagine a sufficiently sophisticated electronic system capable of emulating all the functions of a human brain. Perhaps analog and not digital, which would be better suited for emulating the graded electrochemical signals in the brain. Such a system could behave in every way like a human brain. If it says that it is conscious, could you be convinced? Could you really say it is less conscious than any other person you meet? After all, you cannot truly know another person is conscious in the same way you are.