[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/wsr/ - Worksafe Requests

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor application acceptance emails are being sent out. Please remember to check your spam box!


[Advertise on 4chan]


Whenever i solve a problem i solve it from physical memory

Rather than creating logic to solve the problem

This happens almost all the time when I practice,So when i do a resolve with gap after 4-5 times it sticks

But i should do a creative generation after my second or third attempt easily

If i internalized generation pattern rather than solving from intuition…


Will appreciate inputs on switching to that

If anyone was at this phase and what helped is also appreciated
>>
>>1547790
Lol, creative problem solving doesn’t exist in undergraduate or even graduate courses.
Even if I’m wrong, your question is basically, how to get smarter?

Anyways, my tips:
1. Stop obsessing about “solving from intuition”.
2. Get a collection of problems with solutions. Your homeworks, past exams, old homeworks, textbook with solutions (in the book, solution manual, random guy on the internet).
3. Try those problems. Compare your attempt to the solution. Make notes why you can’t do it. Rinse and repeat.

Do problems. Retards underestimate the number of problems they should do to do well.

You can try problem solving books like Paul Zeitz’ or Polya’s. I think your expectation of real™ problem solving is a bit different from reality.
>>
>>1547808
>Do problems. Retards underestimate the number of problems they should do to do well.
This for all kind of exams
I dont know what you are exactly looking for, but just solving problems does so much more than any Kind of learning
The Kind of logic you are looking for comes with the experience of mamy solved problems



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.