Are water powered stoves /x/?
>>40993952>dogshit btu>needs more energy input than it outputsJust use hydrocarbons anon.
>>40993952Stanley meyers was right bros
>>40993952How do they spit water into oxygen and hydrogen?
>>40996291>spit water in hydrogen and oxygen Froth it up by swishing back and forth in your mouth into it gas air bubbles (oxygen) and the liquid part is already water (hydrogen)>we just solved the energy crisis
>>40996271I once posted on /o/ the automotive board about Stanley’s water engine and Tom Ogle’s 100 mph carburetor and everyone there except 2 posters told me to kys
>>40993952Does it run on water only?
>>40997047they suck on that board, they’re like the blue collar version of /g/
>>40998975Its boggling his work isnt taken more seriously
>>40996291electricity
>>40999006They keep the population dumbed down and focused on goyslop media while feeding them poison so few can understand this type of stuff
>>40999006So what is the catch? The energy required to generate the field EMF field?
>>41000057the hydrogen atom transforms radioactive energy into inferred then is fed back through the tube once at that state. This creates an infinite cycle of energy. Did you not read the picture?>The energy should be negligible, since considered in the dissociation energy is barely more than 100-th of the gross output, and there is probably a way to make the process work without a pump anywaySome scientist can compile the data but not udnerstand enough to get it working, but a faggot on 4chan like me knows all this.
>>40997047>100 mpg carburetorFuel injection is more efficient than any carburetor and we're way short of 100mpg. You can analyze exhaust and determine how much unburnt fuel there is and it's almost zero unless it's broken or a race car. That's max efficiency fueling, you can't magically triple it.
>>41000521>trust the Jewsfuck off glowie faggot. every mechanic worth anything knows you can adjust carburetors to make them more fuel efficient than fuel injectors >durrr car makers would never sabotage fuel efficiency it’s just remained the same because it just does okay Go back 2 reddit you stupid bitch
>>41001687>every mechanic worth anything knows you can adjust carburetors to make them more fuel efficient than fuel injectorsNot really, mentally disabled loser. You can adjust them so you're in a too lean condition, which is bad for the engine, and reduces power so that you would have been better off using a smaller engine with more fueling. You can make a 4L V-8 run like a 2L I-4 if too lean, except all the engine parts (weight) still have to move around so why the fuck are you using a V-8? The I-4 with fuel injection would be more efficient.>buhh what if you underfuel an I-4You'll be lucky to get to 70mph and you'd be better off with a fucking two cylinder. Idiot.
>>41000521It wasn’t a carburetor in the way you think of, it ran on a 3 gallon tank and got over 100 MPH on a v8 ford galaxie> Tom Ogle was an American inventor who came up with the idea of a vapor carburetor that makes an internal combustion engine highly fuel-efficient.>In 1977, Ogle applied his revolutionary innovation on a 1970 Ford Galaxie featuring a V8 engine (427 hp) and a 3-gallon tank. He used a multiple-vapor system in that car and drove it for 100 miles.>It was shocking that Ogle achieved that much fuel efficiency in a 4,000+ pounds car, so a lighter car could provide much more mileage.>What was changed in the Tom Ogle engine? Most internal combustion engines use a carburetor and fuel pump. Liquid fuel is transferred into the combustion chambers and it gets burned to provide power to the engine.>Ogle replaced this carburetor and fuel pump with a black box filter and the combustion chambers were injected with vaporized gasoline.
>>41001915Cont>You might be wondering how Ogle got such a groundbreaking idea. Well, as with many great inventions, Ogle also stumbled upon that innovative idea accidentally. The whole idea of a fuel-efficient superengine came from a deformed lawnmower.>Once, Ogle was running a lawnmower and created a hole in the device accidentally. To fix the damage and keep the machine still working, he used a vacuum line from the carburetor inlet to the engine.>Doing this increased the fuel efficiency of the machine, and a small tank of fuel kept it running for 96 hours.>Encouraged by this discovery, Ogle applied this technique to an automobile engine. But it did not go as planned.>Without a carburetor, the engine tanks collapsed, the speed was slow, and it was gulping a great amount of fuel. The modified vehicle used a gallon for 8 miles, and its average speed was 20 mph.>This was disappointing, but Ogle was determined to find a solution. He found out that the absence of a carburetor was freezing the gas tank, such as ice cubes.>He solved the issue by using heater coils. The coils kept the gas tank at normal temperature, and this simple fix finally made the car run 100 miles on a single gallon.
>>41001909Shut the fuck up faggot JewTom Ogle makes you look like a bitchThat’s why glowies killed him before the age of 30But thank you for bumping and encouraging me to post more evidence I would’ve let the thread die until you gave your ignorant opinion
>>41001915>injected with vaporized gasoline.You're right, fuel injection is more efficient than carburetion.What you're asking for (And claiming exists) is energy from nowhere. There is only so much in gasoline to begin with, and we're using almost all of it for propulsion and mechanical, friction, and heat losses, none of which are changed by carburetion/injection.I can imagine fake-ass tests where a V-8 car got 100mpg, like on a treadmill with no air resistance, or detuned so it has 10HP and going 10mph, maybe. It's impossible with normal driving.
>>41001994>durrr I’m in expert and know everything that is possible go suck a tail pipe you glowing faggot thanks for replying so quickly though despite the thread being dead for 8 hours before I posted actual evidence it’s not sus at all
>>41002008>I’m in expert and know everything that is possibleI'm not that good. Everyone else just sucks.
>>40997047you can get an engine to run very lean and it will produce almost no power but it will run longer on less fuel. this modification makes the car nearly useless however.
Tesla, Stanley Meyers, Tom Ogle, the list of inventors they silence is endless Skeptics of this are literal mouth breathers or glowfucks
>>41002012>>41002037i like how the other anon posted evidence and goaded you into giving them a (you) and bumping the threadyou’re doing god’s work by playing devil’s advocate but you just don’t see it
>>41002012>I don’t know everythingjust contradicted yourself faggot
>>40996291By using more energy than you "gain" from combustion
>>41004145Are you referring to the hydrogen creation?
>>40997047The real conspiracy is why nobody, in over 100 years, has come up with a way to make cheap synthetic gasoline. Or a natural version, from fermentation.
