Square circles is an impossibility in our universe, but does that logic exist in other universes outside of our reality?
>>41014974Why do I keep seeing shit about square circles... a square is a square and a circle is a circle
>>41014984Nature can make circles out of square
>>41014974>Square circles isare
>>41015101That's right
>>41014974You're looking for modal logic. There is metaphysical, ie logical, necessity, and nomological, ie scientific, necessity. They conceptualize modality (Possibility) in terms of possible worlds. So you're looking at metaphysical necessity. If you scope your semantics in nomological necessity, the laws of physics would be necessary, ie, obtaining in all possible worlds. There's also moral necessity. The Same Morality obtains in all possible worlds. Nobody on this planet with our intellect can conceive of anything beyond Metaphysical necessity, ie the way human logic works. So according to the best logicians, circles are not squares in any possible world. That's the highest form of Necessity we know of. If you try to posit some kind of meta-metaphysical necessity, where there is something beyond analytic logic, you wouldn't be able to formulate a proof. The modality of possibility and necessity is a logical system which explicitly posits a human logical limit on what is "metaphysically possible," as metaphysical necessity is the limit placed on the rigorous use of logical symbols. So to answer your question, maybe, but there's no way to prove it or even formulate the question. You basically just said >Is it possible that hurr-durrBecause your symbols don't coalesce into coherent propositional contentIn other words, it's impossible to generate a truth-table where square circles obtain
>>41014984It's the jews trying to use cubist hex sorcery on a natural form.
>>41015216Unless we're capable to travel to other universes as ourselves we will never find the answer to square circles.
>>41014974Not any one's that you can go to.
>>41015519we don't know that. Alternative realities might exist and a fluke may make someone end up into one.
>>41014974Can 0 = 1?
>>41014974Squares and circles are incompatible by definition. So any universe where "squares can be circles" or vice versa is one where the meaning of "square" and "circle" is fundamentally different to what it means for usA thing about logic is that the way it works is not contingent on material conditions. So anything that's logically true is true in all universes, since it's truth is based on the rules of the logic rather than on any facts that might or might not happen to obtain
>>41014974It depends on using only things "Inside" the boxSquare circles... OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>41014974I once showed my math friend this sacred geometry video thing I found on here, that beyond all the nonsense scribble written around the right traingle, what he said kinda changed my outlook on all this /x/ stuff.He said it didn't satisfy the pythagorean theorem, yeah that thing you learned in like 5th grade or whatever, a^2+b^2=c^2, a simple equation but one that absolutely cannot be altered in this reality, for as long as you live, a triangle with 3 sides will never not be able to be a triangel no matter how much /x/ mumbo jumbo you try to sprinkle it with, we still have to obey the laws of physical space
>>41014974>randomly shows up out of nowhere>blocks your path>offers you universal knowledge>watches and laughs like a psychotic sperg as your brain predictably breaks itself from trying to process trinary code in a binary framework>wipes away single tear his eye that was produced as a result from watching the last vestige of your sanity expunge itself from your mind right as your bowels decided to do the same>"damn, dude, that's crazy. enywaiz laterz>doesn't explain himself. >time to make like your tree and LEAF>leaves>unlocks the sliders on your emotional settings on his way out>LOL>leaves for real this time>he'll be back, don't worry>start to worry BECAUSE HE WILL BE COMING BACK>*faintly in the distance grey laughter is heard*>your inner voice model calls them niggers and blames it on you>wtf is braining anymore>too late to think about, T-posing fuck shows up again to tell you to quiet down>you weren't even talking, wtf>also this is a dream>also also T guy wakes you up to tell you that you're in prison now for being too loud>have second psychotic break>no wait, false alarm>not psychosis, but a stoke >just a stroke, no biggie>wat
>>41018146https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RttZdk9kqp8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAOuJWZrZmE
>>41018146>>41018189O ΠΟΙΑΝΤΑΣ ΒΟΥΤΑΣΤΟ ΝΗΣΤ RΟΛΥΜΠΑΤΗΝ ΚΡΗΤΗ ΠΑΤΑΟ⨉Ι ΔΕΝ ΣΤΑΜΑΤΑΜΕ ⨉ΕΡΙ ΣΤΑΘΕΡΟΤΟΝ ΤΟΞΕΥΕΙ ΣΤΟΝ ΣΦΥΡΟΚΑΤΑΣΤΡΕΦΕΙ ΤΟ ΚΑΡΦΙΚΑΙ ΤΟΥ ΠΑΙΡΝΕΙ ΤΗ ΖΩΗ
>>41017117That's a square of circles
>>41018228
>>41018235Indeed
>>41014974>Square circles is an impossibility in our universe, but does that logic exist in other universes outside of our reality?Mathematically speaking, yes.Different METRICS exist.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_space
>>41021450>Mathematically speaking, yesWe don't know if mathematics are the same in different universes
>>41014974Why do you think there is an "outside our reality" ?
>>41015239My fuckin eyes bro fuck
>>41021882>We don't know if mathematics are the same in different universesThat is exactly the point, different metric spaces have different summations. i.e. different maths.
>>41021882I know mathematics are the same across all universal possibilities in this reality.I also know the notion of "outside this reality" is silly, you couldn't define it if you tried.
>>41015101Now you're thinking with portals! Lol!
