The whole point of being skyclad is to renounce all worldly attachment, pride, shame. There is no saffron cloth and staff, no ego, just emptiness and fearlessness. So why don't women do it? Shouldn't they be fearless and free too? You might think they will be sexually harassed, and no doubt a 20 year old sadhvi with ample breasts and a thin waste would be followed my 200 incels. Even the Sadhus might have visible sky clad erections. But a 90 year old woman walking naked? That would destroy the sexual appetites of humanity and force a kind of renunciation onto society. Does anyone else understand what I am getting at here? How do I contact the head of the Jains?
What do you care what other people do or dont?
>>41016385Well they make it their whole personalities.I care (not op) because it’s a conflict between doctrine and action.People hate Christianity for the difference between doctrine and action of its adherents. Why can’t we do the same with other religions?
>>41016385What do you care what OP cares or doesn't care about? Huh? Riddle me that, diddler.>>41016366This already a shit thread.
>>41016366>So why don't women do it?Rape.>Shouldn't they be fearless and free too?Have you seen what crawls around there?>But a 90 year old woman walking naked? That would destroy the sexual appetites of humanity and force a kind of renunciation onto society.What part of "WOULD" did you not understand?
>>41016366They used to, during the very early periods of Indian history where women wearing clothes that expose lots of skin or even going topless wasn't that uncommon.
>>41016438It would be good for collecting donations too. Skyclad beauties being showered in rupee notes.
>>41016366YEAH JAINIST THREAD LETS GOOO
>>41016366I thought Jains were supposed to be hardcore ascetics, but most of the Jain monks I've seen have massive potbellies.The whole dry fasting to death thing is pretty brutal though
>>41016366Their are multiple sects anon, and the one that practices nudity is sexist as hell. Women can't achieve enlightenment in their doctrine so there aren't any female monks.
i find everything about jainism childish and stupid
>>41016366>Does anyone else understand what I am getting at here?Why do you want to see a 90 year old woman walking around naked, anon?
>>41017238>Women can't achieve enlightenment in their doctrine
>>41017337Sure anon, but it also means OPs question is dumb as hell.
>>41017337kashmiri shaivism and shakta are generally pro women and that is where white
>>41017412*white girl yoga came from
>>41016366His torso and stomach look like a dog's face, with the nipples being the eyes, the weird spot above the bellybutton the nose and the bellybutton the mouth
>>41017315Even I understand the difference between wanting to see a 90 year old woman naked and wanting to see a 90 year old Jain woman going nakedBut apparently the simple answer is "women don't go naked because they simply are not allowed to achieve enlightenment (and being naked is only to chase enlightenment)Is that right? Dead thread, now?
>>41017068>, but most of the Jain monks I've seen have massive potbellies.>The whole dry fasting to death thing is pretty brutal thoughA potbelly actually can be a sign of starvation
>>41017433Checked and yea dead thread. Only dedicated monks of the Digambara sect practice acestic nudity and the Digambara sect doesn't believe women can attain enlightenment. No enlightenment, so basically no female monks (a few over the centuries but not really), so no naked Digambara women.
>>41016366>But a 90 year old woman walking naked? That would destroy the sexual appetites of humanity and force a kind of renunciation onto society.You underestimate how horny and degenerate the average jeet is.For them, a hole is a hole.
>>41017418This is the kind of exegesis I come here for.
>>41017272that must be because you are a fucking retard thats why
>>41016366>But a 90 year old woman walking naked?You severely underestimate Indians.
