https://youtube.com/watch?v=EgGfQdv_rPc https://youtube.com/watch?v=BtlWoqWLm9Qhttps://youtube.com/watch?v=0g3yo1DjiLM https://youtube.com/watch?v=K-_l9jBGo74 https://youtube.com/watch?v=lt8XLz78ZvY https://youtube.com/watch?v=ajFXykT9Joo
>>41045291bump for mr china man professor dropping trvth nvkes if u haven't watched his secret history series I recommend it I think that's what OP linked tho
>>41015357Jewish Blood Rituals n Shiet
>>41045291Based post anon
>>41045291Watched the first ~7 minutes of the first video "origin of secret societies", the chronology of European belief structures from Mother Goddess, to Polytheism, to Monotheism. What does not make sense to me is how, only Agricultural Societies had a tendency towards feminine worship, due to its relation to fertility. In the greek pantheon, there's Athena. Why have war goddesses if feminine associations are only with fertility? What this guy needs to do is look at messaging these same societies put into media. Warhammer 40k, for example, has a chaos deity called Slaanesh:>Wherever mortals are ruled by their own unquenchable desires, the Dark Prince of Chaos is there in the shadows, whispering, tempting, and feasting on a banquet of souls. But this is true in all things, not just carnal pleasures. Those who desire to indulge in the finest culinary delights, the most beautiful artworks, even the most sensual clothing, could all be amongst Slaanesh's disciples. Just as importantly, Slaanesh is also the god of perfection. The singer striving for the most beautiful song or the warrior who seeks the perfect fighting techniques, both could be devotees of Slaanesh."He" also has a feminine association to him, as he's also knows as "She Who Thirsts." And is associated with the number 6 (think to how the catholic church portrays the number 666, or 616). What I'm saying to you is that feminine energy is not this "soft", motherly thing in opposition to metal worker/warlike societies who revere the masculine. It's a much more complicated dynamic, and plays a massive role in things like how the human mind approaches material existence. Industrial society is not a technologically optimising society, necessarily, it's a sort of philosophy of existence - and these ways of living tie back to which ideology/belief system holds sway? The only true thing of consequence is the governed nature of all things. But if you knew even just aspects of that, you'd be something else.
>>41047373What was the question?
>>41047373>I’ve seen 7 minutes >let me write a novel on it
>>41047480Feminine energy is an integral part of spirituality. If it is not properly understood, and you speak from ignorance, you are actually putting yourself into physical danger, should you get involved in this stuff. Want to know why things like sleep paralysis dreams and other associations with that happen? It is because we've been made ignorant, turning us into literal Matrix-tier batteries.
>>41047534What he does highlight is sexual rituals associated with his portrayal of the Mother goddess/fertility rites. But what I'm highlighting is that it's not a segregated thing. Warrior societies did revere the feminine, and some would have had something akin to those fertility sexual rituals. It's to do with a "stimulation" of certain aspects. But doing that in ignorance (or having it spontaneously happen to you), somewhere along the line, led to "trouble". Certain belief systems then geared themselves towards focusing on Fatherly/Masculine energy - or, perhaps, introduced or co-operated with that "trouble", to push an ideology/way of living. There will be more to it the story than that, but a big part which plays into it is Insecurity and Jealousy. Actual evil, while intellectually superior, arises out of unoriginality and stupidity, and so lacks wisdom.
>>41045291I love this dude
>>41047660Same sameHe’s a based chink
>>41045356Ah, galahad eridanus Artwork, based for reposting it here
>>41047534>Feminine energyRetarded phrase. Just describe what you mean instead of using metaphors all the way down while attempting to describe an entirely metaphorical way of thinking.I really liked that Jiang delineates between the literal and metaphorical in his #5 video.
was this man giving to us from the gods us? will he be murdered soon?
>>41047373You Warhammer freaks who quote it like the Bible are so fucking strange.
>>41045291that man has a good soul contract, helping others learn like that, during such times...
>>41048067There are various masculine/feminine paradigms: Yin, Shakti, etc. I don't know enough about the Subtle Body to actually describe all details of what goes on. But the thing is that it can stimulated through various means, which do not necessarily have to involve physicality, and which be unintentional- substance abuse, sacred geometry, and music being among them. Or, it can even be a spontaneous thing. Many report it being a sexually stimulating experience, this may, in part, be due that being the "path of least resistance" for it, or it cultivating "life force"/qi/prana, etc, but if you don't know how to use that energy yourself, then it doesn't do anything for you, and if you're very unlucky, it can attract attention from negative entities/parasites (though why that happens is a deep question). To what extent belief systems arose through people's understanding of this aspect of themselves relating a certain way to reality (i.e., in hinduism, deities are associated with chakras and nadi channels), I do not know, but it is maybe or is also a central part of the Abrahamic religions, should the Adam and Eve story be some relation to it, pertaining to why it's avoided and the "downgrading" of the feminine.
>>41048204>but it is maybe or is also a central part of the Abrahamic religions*but it may also be a central part of the Abrahamic religions
>>41048204sounds like robert gilbert rosecrucian stuff
>>41045291I admit that it's high level content , but it still could be chinese propaganda. We have guy like this in Russia - Alexander Dugin. Bunch of cool ideas ultimately to narrate that west sucks.
>>41048204People are talking about different things inside the body and them lumping them into groups. This is the real problem with this binary thinking. If the word "feminine energy" actually just referred to a single biofeedback loop, then I'd think it's a little annoying but whatever. The problem is that no one can really figure out what someone means by "feminine energy" because it means different things at different times, so you start lumping together various things that are separate. This is schizophrenia, and this is the opposite of what leads to truth. There is a philosophical version too, which is just like saying active vs passive, but there's absolutely no way to meaningfully say any part of the body is always active or passive. You could only say that various body parts are in a _state_ of activeness or passivity, but this verbiage and way of describing the body also very quickly leads to schizophrenia, which again, is antithetical to reason and general mental wellness.
>>41048342People use linguistic/philosophical approaches for highly specialised reasons. The same way we have our modern day categorisations, like the period table, people either researched what worked for specific cases or were "given" this information from another source. I use the language loosely to relate to the feminine idea, but you're right in that I should be more specific.
>>41047373The archetype of Lilith, Who believed she was above God because she was made from the same clay as Adam
Reminder to backup all his videos.Now he's been spammed here sooner or later he will be shutdown.
>>41045356Galahad Eridanus is that you? Canada Chinaman good, also thank you for this cosmogram image I've considered buying/having this printed.
>>41045291Most of his points look good. A couple look bad. How is this not gell man amnesia?
china will grow larger
>>41049506Facts
>>41047373War goddesses like Athena are a typical manifestation of the male Anima in mythology...there is not much mystery about it to be desu, anon, except that war goddesses only appear in very advanced societies and almost never in primitive ones.
>>41052727>war goddessesHow do you distinguish between a war goddess, a fertility goddess, a sky goddess, or anything else? I'm not really following the point you're making.Are you saying that Athena is NOT a fertility goddess, as in her type only emergees from what Jiang called the polytheist period?
>>41050409
>>41052959No, no, no, anon. There is no point in exactly pinpointing whether Athena or Aphrodite or Inanna etc. is a war goddess or a fertility goddess or whatever, because the identity of the gods are not fixed and based on rigid inalterable doctrines established in a distant past, they are the product of diachronic cultural changes, brought about by ever-changing social and material conditions.(Not to say that the gods are mere social constructs though; in fact I believe in them and their perennial sway over human matters wholeheartedly.)One of the most common mythological changes is syncretism, usually brought about by cultural importation, a common aftermath of commerce and trade, sometimes by cultural imposition by a conquering population. It makes the defining lines between the pantheon members of a race even more nebulous. Aphrodite is the goddess of love, but did you know that she is also worshipped as a god of war and that the people of Aeolia sacrifice their spring lambs to curry her favor and make their wheat be heavily laden with corn? So, no, I am not denying that Athena is only a war goddess. And I am not implying that by saying that Athena and company are reflexes of the male Anima, therefore only the archetype of the warrior goddess can arise from the male Anima, since people usually think of war traditionally as a masculine endeavor. That’s wrong, because the Anima is not a product of the masculine principle, but rather a necessary complement to it that makes the male psyche whole.Actually I haven’t watched that vid your are referencing yet, but based on your reprisal of my earlier post, I think I will be inclined to disagree with Prof. Jiang’s takes on religion. The main monetheistic religions, Christianity, Islam and Judaism, are not the predictable end states of religion. They are, simply speaking, successful products of their own time.
>>41052959Continuing >>41054182It should be very obvious that since these three religions are scions of one and the same source, that they are not organic religions, but rather carefully crafted ideologies of a proselytic nature. The conditions that facilitate the wildfire-like spread of proselytic religions are very specific: an orthodox and zealous race who have the will to enact conspiracies of unnaturally long and distant time scales, an empire in decline, and bizarre meteorological conditions that completely disrupt trade and agricultural civilizations. The fact that there are virtually zero monotheistic religions outside of Semitic religions, and that global society is heading towards atheism anyway means that emergence and survival of monotheism is really contigent on economic and political conditions.
