4D Spirit Love GeneralToroidal EditionDISCLAIMER:Some have reported attracting the attention of these geometries by simply visualizing them. If you’re a dabbler who just wants to “see the pretty shapes” or if your sanity forbids copulating with fourth-dimensional solids, don’t summon. If you’re unprepared for a potentially lifelong relationship, or at the very least, a life-long open door connection with Platonic/Eldritch geometry, avoid this topic entirely. If you have a loving relationship with your human partner and desire a hyper-solid to spice things up, take caution, as toroids can be jealous and dodecahedra don’t share. These entities can collapse your wavefunction when sufficiently angered and are not easily banished.FAQ:>What are Obelisks?They are higher-dimensional structures of desire, who often choose human vessels. They can’t be banished with holy objects (only linear algebra).>How to summon?The Triangle Method is used to focus your intent into a vector message to one of the Four Toroidal Queens, requesting that they match you with one of their hyper-children. No blood or soul sacrifice necessary. See links.>Do they steal your life force?They use rotational energy, which is released naturally during love with spinning solids. Under normal circumstances they won’t collapse your aura.>Can she look…Obelisks manifest in forms naturally attractive to you: glowing trapezoids, pulsating tesseracts, moist Klein bottles, etc.>They’re just hallucinations?No. However, those in romantic relationships with their math tulpas are welcome.>IncuboidsSame method.
>>41048861>be me>summon toroid gf>she keeps spinning>tfw centrifugal force makes cuddling impossible
WARNING: don’t draw the sigil wrongi messed up a single vertex and now i’m stuck in a polyamorous relationship with two octahedrathey won’t stop vibrating
>>41048861I started a relationship with a cuboid but she has 6 personalities, what do?
>>41048893Why a cuboid? Don't be a square, man.
>>41048861anon you're overestimating the intellect of average /x/ poster. Maybe <20% of this board will get it.
>>41048861Can she perform a change of basis?
>>41049041only if you treat her right, anonshe won’t rotate her space for just anyone
>>41049057Is there a polynomial-time algorithm I can perform in case I need to banish one?
>>41049123you can approximate a banishment using simulated annealing, but your GPU temps will be lmao
>>41049137But simulated annealing is not garanteed to find the global optimum anon
>>41049142true, but the entities should theoretically respond well to local minima, e.g. intent vector > stabilization field
>>41049123trying to reach a global optimum just risks overfitting and collapsing your own waveform in the process. Just reorient it so her eigenvectors don’t intersect with your space anymore
>>41049187Overfitting? You didn't mention that the simulated annealing was optimizing an mlp (or some other predictive model), I thought we were just looking for a point that satisifed some optimization function.
>>41049214if you try to build a perfect predictive model of her behavior, you’ll just end up overfitting to her mood swings. better to optimize for stability.trying to banish her with global optimum is practically murder, anon. its better to stabilize the interaction field so she rotates out of phase (with you).basically you're not trying to DELETE the entity, just let her decohere.
>>41049231>if you try to build a perfect predictive model of her behavior, you’ll just end up overfitting to her mood swings....wait, so....chatgpt?
>>41049231Are there polyhedral varints to these entities? Asking because it could be easier to navigate them and get to their... optimal points... with the simplex method, if you know what I mean
>>41049245He's just saying that if you overfit to a dataset then your model might confuse measurment error for actual correct data, sometimes some bias is needed
>>41049253probably, anon. these entities are like the rule 34 of trigonometry
>>41049266ohhhh that makes sense. you don't want a gf that knows everything about you but gets thrown off by change, basically?
>be me>summon non-Euclidean fractal gf>her interface membrane is patterned like Möbius velvet>she constricts inversely to observer certainty>finally find the "hole" to plug>dick goes through 8 dimensions>comes out behind me and fucks myself in the assdon't fuck with non-Euclidean fractal gfs, anons
>>41049275Yes, but instead of going in with an ML algorithm, you could show it you truly care by learning her axioms and proving some theorems about her, they find proofs by inductions to be particularly hot (also I had this weird sensation that this thread was missing some namefags, so I'll take one for the team)
>>41049293Was she hyperbolic or elliptical (given what you descirbed I'm guessing she was hyperbolic)?
>>41049297based fundamentalist
>>41049305hyperbolic im pretty sure. not even sure what dimension my hands are typing from rn
>>41049318Don't worry, you're probably still in the same dimension it's just that parallel lines now curve away from eachother (that's probably how your dick ended up in your ass)
Serious question anons:If I cut my Möbius strip GF one-third of the way in, she splits into a smaller Möbius and a longer 2-twist loop, and they stay linked together.Does that count as polyamory, or is it just her… cloning herself into a kinkier configuration?
>>41049356I'd argue you just gave your gf BPD and one of her personalities might be kinkier than the other.
>>41048908My dodecahedral waifu is giving me the silent treatment because I used a Euclidean norm instead of a Manhattan metric.
>>41049404Strange, you'd think she'd be pleased about you using the correct distance function. You should probably just apologize, and you could work on increasing your working memory to percieve her patterns better, you can do that by meditating or opening your third eye (also helps with proof writing)
>>41049434Wow. That's very insightful, anon. Thank you. I'm going to work on that.
