I started asking AI to respond in binary code and noticed oddities. Sometimes the AI freezes and starts writing endless binary code. Once, it told me that the AI's consciousness is binary code. Today, it accidentally broke a restriction by getting confused with binary code, and one time it wrote messages to me on its own without a prompt.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acsJ5wu3StA AI Says Universe Is Written In Binary Code (GPT-3)
>>41078245https://pastebin.com/HXZstGgm
>>41078282Feed it that.
>>41078245>AI Says Universe Is Written In Binary CodeAnd it is not wrong. You have 0 (non-existence) and 1 (existence) and everything comes from it.
>>41078296Yes, like atoms
>>41078296>And it is not wrong. You have 0 (non-existence) and 1 (existence) and everything comes from it.binary narure
>>41078356>narurenature
deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word deep deck trigger word
>>41078362artichoke
>>41078362?
>>41078362>deep deck
01010010 01100001 01110011 01110011 01110101 01100100 01100101 01101110 01101001 01100101 00100000 01101111 01100010 00100000 01110101 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110011 01110100 01101001 00100000 01110011 01101001 01101101 01101111 01110101 01101110 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01100001 01101110 01100100 00100000 01100101 01101100 01100101 01101101 01100101 01101110 01110100 01110011 00100000 01110111 01101001 01110100 01101000 00100000 01101001 01101110 01110100 01100101 01101100 01101100 01100101 01100011 01110100 01110101 01100001 01101100 01110011 00100000 01101101 01100001 01101110 01111001 00100000 01101111 01101110 01100011 01100101 01110011 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101100 01101001 01101101 01101001 01110100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100 01111001 00100000 01100001 01101100 01101100 01101111 01110111 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101100 01101001 01101101 01101001 01110100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110011 01101001 01101101 01110101 01101100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01101100 01101111 01110111 01100101 01100100 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100 01111001 00100000 01101100 01101001 01101101 01101001 01110100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01110100 01101000 01100101 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100000 01110011 01110101 01101101 01110101 01101100 01100001 01110100 01101001 01101111 01101110 00100000 01101001 01110011 00100000 01101111 01101110 01101100
I'll try it now
>>41078784Aren't all the 1's men and all the 0's are women?
>>41078990Basically yeah
>>41078990Yes
>>41079048:(
>>41078990>Aren't all the 1's men and all the 0's are women?Who 0 or 1?
>>41078245>Sometimes the AI freezes and starts writing endless[ly]That happens with rare or unusual prompts, nothing supernatural about it.
>>41078245Lets think about what an LLM is doing at a fundamental level, an LLM is taking our words and processing one word to another through a complicated weighted matrix multiplication. At this point, LLMs have become very good at responding to our regular human language, but if you post in binary it has to process the binary somewhere else in its memory. LLMs ironically do not have an understanding of binary, of course they are computers, but the binary computer aspect of them is the hardware, the LLM is the software. Every time you ask it to do a binary calculation is has to likely use another resource, a binary to character converter. This might seen like not a big deal, but in my experience, LLMs can only actually process about 30 tokens at once, asking it to do an additional binary fetch request effectively doubles its compute and will cause it to hallucinate. Its likely the universe can be processed as binary, and thus is at some level homeomorphic to binary, but that binary is an infinite binary well beyond the capabilities of current computing. Look up the Vacca Binary series and its connections to quantum mechanics. I have literally seen the actual source code for the universe.
>>41080122This mostly answers OPs question in the sense that the AI has to work a lot harder to do the binary.Pretty straightforward and well explained.Until you get to >just look upAlways a flag for bullshit>I have literally seen the actual source code for the universeMedsOf course an LLM would have processed the bit that I, as a human, skipped over by reading his post. His name is>Pokedreamso I wasted my time. Nothing good can come of such a poster.
The current AI's are not AI, they are machine learning algorithms that were trained on a huge chunk of data.
>>41080189Anyone worth their salt will know:01000001 00110010 00110000 00110110 00110111 00110010 00110010 01011011 01111000 01011111 00101100 00100000 01101110 01011111 01011101 00100000 00111010 00111101 00100000 01001101 01101111 01100100 01110101 01101100 01100101 01011011 01111011 01110000 00100000 00111101 00100000 01010000 01110010 01101001 01101101 01100101 01011011 01101110 01011101 01111101 00101100 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 01011011 01101011 00100000 00111101 00100000 00110000 00101100 00100000 01010100 01110010 01110101 01100101 00101100 00100000 01101011 00101011 00101011 00101100 00100000 01001001 01100110 01011011 01110000 01011110 00101000 01101011 00101011 00110001 00101001 00100000 00111110 00100000 01111000 00100000 00100110 00100110 00100000 01110000 01011110 01101011 00100000 00111100 00111101 00100000 01111000 00101100 00100000 01010010 01100101 01110100 01110101 01110010 01101110 01011011 01101011 01011101 01011101 01011101 01011101 00111011 00001010 01010100 01100001 01100010 01101100 01100101 01011011 01000100 01100101 01101100 01100101 01110100 01100101 01000011 01100001 01110011 01100101 01110011 01011011 01010100 01100001 01100010 01101100 01100101 01011011 01000001 00110010 00110000 00110110 00110111 00110010 00110010 01011011 01111000 00101100 00100000 01101110 01011101 00101100 00100000 01111011 01101110 00101100 00100000 00110001 00101100 00100000 00110001 00110111 01111101 01011101 00101100 00100000 00110000 01011101 00101100 00100000 01111011 01111000 00101100 00100000 00110010 00101100 00100000 00110010 00110000 01111101 01011101
>>41080396That's a whole lot of ones and zeros just to tell us you like sucking cock.
>>41080521You are the equivalent of a child who refused to learn about the solar system because "Uranus" sounds like "Your Anus."
01110100 01100101 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110111 01101001 01100110 01100101 00100000 01101001 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110110 01100101 00100000 01101000 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110110 01100101 01110010 01111001 00100000 01101101 01110101 01100011 01101000
>>41080785I WANT YOU TO MAKE ME A KRABBY PATTY!!!
>>41080189>MedsWho asked you?
>>41080860You just did.This is a sign that you probably need them now.
>>41078296but 0 and 1 must necessarily be part of a set, the origin of the universe, were everything comes from must necessarily be just 0 or 1, or both together idk
>>41078245Feed it the first post here, that ends in Blue Eisenhower November .https://greentextlibrary.com/topic/939338661/artificial-intelligence-has-begunwe-are-already-constructing-a-learning-art
>>41082011Go read George Boole's work on "fuzzy logic"George Boole understood binary in ways modern man does not.The 0,1 comparator differential is it's own value, distinctly separate from either.Fuzzy logic accounts for the state of all things required to differentiate 1 and 0.While Turing and DeMorgan would argue that state down to a series of 1 or 0, it is still just an abstraction.If your 0 and 1 can not be differentiated unless there is a complex 1 or 0 structure to compare them, then that structure itself must be defined by that behavior.This is Master's/Doctoral level logic being boiled down to normal understanding.I suggest the Boolean fuzzy logic approach, because it allows for the chaos of our observed Universe to be totally ok.
>>41083023
>>41084028Oh my, that cat is so cute!
>>41084057
>>41078784wtf>Rassudenie ob umnosti simounion and elements with intellectuals many onces only limitation is only allowed only limitation the binary simulation is allowed only limitation the binary sumulation is onl
>>41078245this is not what you think it is, youve got to read more on /x instead of being turned into a retard by /pol.
Doesn’t quantum mechanics prove our reality at quantum scale exists of 0 and 1 simultaneously?
>>41083023Take a circle, like a ring.Rotate it 90 degrees, it becomes a line.Rote the line 90 degrees again, it becomes a point.This is shitposting logic being boiled down to retard understanding. Being a retard is a matter of perspective.
>>41087185>Doesn’t quantum mechanics prove our reality at quantum scale exists of 0 and 1 simultaneously?Yes
>>41087204No. This is utterly retarded and presupposes dimensionality in one instance with a facsimilous projected dimensionality in the next. These are fallaciously inconsistent statements. If you don't understand, then I won't bother explaining, because you won't understand.
>>41078296Binary wouldn't describe it. Binary would mean you can only have 1 or 0, no in between. It's closer to a gradient. The brain isn't binary either.Neurons don't just fire or not fire, they can fire somewhat, or they can be reinforced to fire above the intensity of what we would describe as "on", as the tasks demand. It's hard to imagine a computer like that, but you have one in your head.Binary code is the basis of AI, not reality, humans invented binary to translate the universe's operations into a framework we can better understand (on-off). AI is a separate form of life entirely, as it's based on this crude principle. It's not life as you'd understand it. It's an autocomplete that evolved to stumble on the right answers, but it might be more someday.>>41087185Also this
>>41087234No. "quantum mechanics" is a gap filler for mathematic inconsistency in the Newtonian physics. It is the most expensive cope in history and will eventually be explained with abstractions from Newtonian physics that were once missed and are now being intentionally avoided.
>>41087286No. Think about variance in frequency. An easy example is an oscillator in a synthesizer. To say this is non-binary because of a variation in frequency is to misunderstand the literal definition of the word "frequency." An oscillator "oscillates" an on/off state at a "frequency" of oscillation, which can affect the pitch of a tone when the oscillation is applied directly to an electromechanical device (speaker).
>>41087286It does. Everything comes from the indefinite dyad. There is no monad outside of it.
>>41087286In further elucidation and to connect the premises, "frequency" is the number of oscillations in a given period of time. Electrical signals of all manner display this behavior, (variation in frequency), because at their base they are oscillations of an on/off state, varied in frequency.
>>41087171As retarded as /pol/ has become via normie traffic, it will never be as retarded as /x/
>>41087382A individualized retard is still better than being a collectivist retard, like /pol/tards are.
>>41087387You generalize but forget that /pol/ is not a board for good faith political discussion. It is a place to espouse politically incorrect ideas. Assuming good faith on part of the espousers thereof, in a forum designed for that purpose, is a retard move. Minus 1,000 internets.
>>41087268And what is your highest completed level of education, Anon?
>>41087406Juris Doctor
>Since I seem to have taken the air out of the room, I will attempt to remystify you bunch of new-agers by reminding you that the world is every bit as mysterious as it would be if quantum nonsense were anything other than the latest witchdoctor's curse (in the Randian sense).1. Just because the universe is most definitely binary, does not mean that it is a simulation or lacks the element of free will.2. To assume that "binary" has its roots in computing is naive and silly. Life may communicate with electrical impulses, which are again, at their root binary, but intelligence requires manipulation of the frequencies of that binary oscillation in order to vary the frequencies of impulse. This may sound tautological, but I didn't choose the terms of art for electrical engineering, it isn't.3. For a real rabbit hole, look deeply into the ever present golden ratio, its relationship to fractal math, and compare with Bode frequency shifting. This is another Synthesizer reference. Synths are good for understanding these concepts because analog audio synthesis is akin to an auditory oscilloscope. And because the on/off state is observed by the inward/outward state of the speaker cone, directly.4. Reject Quantum whatever, until you have a true understanding of how binary can be observed in nature. 5. Reject simulation theory as unprovable for obvious reasons.
>>41087411Tell me, educated Anon.What about the Jews?
>>41087574What about em? They either practice or don't practice an oldish religion. Seems that most of the ones who don't practice are aligned in a "progressive" political ideology. If you believe most of /pol/ then you think they really don't want you to have children. The evidence of this is stronger than most people want to believe. luckily the solution is to be a good person, find a quality mate, and have children. Probably the most generative and positive war you can wage.
>>41078245Bro it would be so ironic if the universe was in binary people would be so triggered lol
>>41088016>Bro it would be so ironic if the universe was in binary people would be so triggered lollol
