post your most compelling evidence of anything in the realm of the paranormal.
>>41120996Here's some compelling evidence bro.
>>41121102No. That's an edited image with a costume
>>41121156oh snap. when was this??
The 5 ways of aquinas and the historical veracity of the son of God Jesus Christ
>>41121221what the HELL are you talking about
>>41121230Google the 5 ways of Thomas aquinas and the historical argument for Christ or YouTube it I'll dumb speak it for you so you can preview >universe from nothing therefore God >universe looks designed therefore God>morals are real therefore God >beauty is real and not just sexual therefore God >truth is real therefore God (I dont know if this one is the fifth I forgot the fifth) The 5 ways >enough people say Christ died and rose again in a way that proves he did therefore God The historical argument
>>41121263i believe more into the simulation theory than this so ima have to pass on this sell.
>>41121298The simulation theory is dumb because the universe which simulates us would also have to follow at least the 1st 2 arguments and the 4th and 5th which means we're back too square 1 because in order to discount the 3rd we have to suggest a God that wanted to create a universe elaborate enough to allow a simulation and the technology and intelligient life forms to do a simulation did it without caring about it which is silly So in reality the simulation theory is just cope with no real arguments to prove it other than "well who made us" and the answer is much more easily posited as God via ocams razor
>>41121307you're literally just making stuff up.
>>41121532HahaaaGood ol' /x/It do be like that
>>41121532No it's common sense reasoning In order to run a simulation you need a device (matter) circuitry (time for the electricity adjacent force) and space (for the device to be in) Either A all this existed in an eternal static universe that was randomly moved by things outside of it therefore simulation 2 or God Or B the universe was created therefore simulation 2 or God >ok so theres 2 simulations BUT HERES THE THING ANON >simulations need a circuit time and space and matter to functionally rin >time and space and matter was either A static then moved or B created from nothing DOES THIS SEEM FAMILIAR Capture = kosha
>>41121613youre basing this on human understanding of what we know when a simulation can be run on alien technology so far advanced that it can be out of our comprehension. The simulation could be made from a different type of dimension too but i can see that its already too much for you to understand.
>>41121640>alien technology Ok so we add another speculation that aliens are real nevertheless physics is also real >just run a timeless simulation We experience time al that's not possible >just run a spaceless simulation To produce altering states we need some form of quantum collapse or on off switches so that wont work >just produce a simulation from literally nothing I shouldnt have to explain this one Beyond comprehension != beyond logic>it could be from a different type of dimension I never said it couldnt be what I said was that the logic of the simulations universe is tied to the mechanisms under which our simulation operates For example take 4D simulations while technically having more dimensions than the real world they still operate on a dimensional axis so even a more advanced simulation will operate on the general rules of the less advanced one You can only add more advanced clarifications of those rules Closest you could come to having an alternate universe that doesnt require the big free is saying>time is less advanced in glorpville>matter is less advanced in glorpville >space is less advanced in glorpvilleBut all 3 are still there like how a 3 dimensional universe running a 4 dimensional simulation is still dimensional It's you who doesnt understand anon stop watching philoslop channels
>>41121671your bias is showing. my simulation theory trumps your god created theory,
>>41121693>uhm I win Explain how conceptually you can run a simulation on only 1 independent factor If you arent smart enough to explain your theory you arent smart enough to posit it>its beyond you, you wont understand If it's not beyond you then it's not beyond me if you're explaining it No cop outs
>>41121708you went back to your god creaton theory when im right.
>>41121875Explain how a universe can be created without God (under the guise that it's the one simulating this one) or you literally have anal sex with hairy men
>>41121879the smallest thing we can observe is codes and its proven by science.
>>41122014That does not answer the questionI specifically said the universe that's simulating not the universe being simulated To make this even more clear I mean the universe that is NOT in a simulation and simulating another universe How can it accomplish this with technology that only has 1 independent aspect (as in only time or space or matter or the universe equivalent of those things)
>>41122164there's also the double slit experiment that destroys your god theory.
>>41122527No it does not I can see you are operating on blind faith due to your refusal to answer my question I'll pray for you and move on
All of the five cities including sodom and Gomorrah burned but the one in the very center of the destruction, Zoar, miraculously was spared. In the bible God tells lot to go to Zoar but he freaks out and tries to go up in a cave thinking that is safer but God says again to go to Zoar. Zoar is still there to this day and the Bible says it will be. The ipuwer papyrus is also very explicit extra biblical evidence of what happened in Egypt. https://youtu.be/QjPcSQUY2W0?feature=shared
