Curious to know what anons on here think about Vadim Zeland's work.
>>41130484Interesting but sooooo long...I kept reading for weeks, looking forward to the chapter titled something like "back to the past", but it was misleading in the end, I was so disappointed that I stopped reading.
>>411304845000pages that can be summed up with if good things happen fallow them if bad things happen reject them
>>41130484real fucking boring and the pretendious writing style is so badlike tutsi the priestess was a little bit shorter and funner but this is just suboptimal if i wanted to hear someone anecdotes id listen to the goddard lectures
>>41130484I found it interesting but repetitive like others mentioned
>>41130484interesting but never finished. i had found what i needed early on in the book. my suspicion is that the text has some element of programming to it but comes off strange in translation. what i enjoyed most of what i did read was about the space of variation.
>>41130484I put it on my ebook reader at work thinking it would be a quick read. Weeks later I'm like what the fuck how am I still reading a single book. Concept of pendulums is very good to figure out so you can disconnect your life force from fueling stupid bullshit.I tried transurfing at work and it worked immediately, it was baffling. Better than all the manifestation bullshit. Been years since I read it or applied it.
>>41130484Someone IRL told me about this.
>>41136409To think that there are still people in real life that talk about books.And that you thought it was worth posting this.Truly what wonderful era.
