Anonymous
09/26/25(Fri)20:57:33 No.41174469

File: images.jpg (6 KB, 184x273)

6 KB JPG

Anonymous 09/26/25(Fri)20:57:33 No.41174469

An infinite being is the ultimate personality.

They'd max all skills, have unlimited power ; would be undefinable, would inherently be unpredictable, would not be bidden by even their own word, for that would limit their power and identity -- Even extreme terms in our language do not capture how extreme it is.

Now all this is to say, as something so "beyond", let us consider the Latin root "Trans" -- which means "Across, Through, and Beyond "

So, if God exists -- defining a gender for such a concept would be folly -- such a being by it's own rules would not be bidden to either binary extreme expressed by smaller minds.

Furthermore, such a being is not disallowed preference, cuz to imply that it only exists "in between" would be to assume anything of it's potential enough to be "limiting" -- Therefore, at any given time, the Gender of God can safely assumed to be "Beyond" what we may perceive -- however, strangely, as I've stated -- this is not to imply that God is incapable of preference, which would create a favored element at any given time. At best, a fluidity is definitely implied through these assumptions, which, once again, is like a 2D cross section of an INFINITE-D being ; So it is not hyperbole to suggest that sometimes this following statement is not only true, but also the only logical assumption for a being that compromises all of creation (all that is, ever has been, ever will be, and at once, never shall be, or is yet to be dreamed of) -- which of course can only be measured through "CHANGE" or "Becoming".

>God is transgender


And that's probably why such a being rejects a world of strict binaries and the ones who uphold them. To expect an indefinite being of static expression is to limit that being, which, I suppose would be to directly harm or offend that being.